Re: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-21 Thread Dierk Haasis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello azrael! On Saturday, April 21, 2001 at 2:43:05 AM you wrote: On Friday, April 20, 2001, at 8:34:59 PM, Chema Berian thoughtfully wrote: CB Well, they are both gone :D Chema; I love it. : D . Friday night and

Re: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-21 Thread azrael
On Saturday, April 21, 2001, at 5:31:39 AM, Dierk Haasis thoughtfully wrote: DH Still looks as if anything is at the beginning of the template; your DH replies have a lot of empty space at the top (see above between my DH date line and yours). Dierk, I don't doubt

Re: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread azrael
Hello Brian, Thursday, April 19, 2001, 11:40:37 PM, you kindly wrote: Tmtdc Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 20:18:05 -0400 Tmtdc From: Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tmtdc Subject: Re: Digest (04/18/2001 13:58) Special Issue (#2001-989) Tmtdc Hi azrael, Tmtdc @ 11:48:16 AM on 4/19/2001, azrael wrote:

Re: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread azrael
TBUDLreplytemp On Friday, April 20, 2001, at 4:31:43 PM, Nick Andriash wrote: NA However, what comes out of hitting F4 is entirely dependant on your NA Reply Template. Do you have an Address Book entry for TBUDL? If so, NA right click on it and choose Properties/Reply. What do you have listed

Re[2]: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread Chema Berian
Hello Listers, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, at 18:05:54 [GMT -0400] (which was 0:05 where I live) azrael wrote: a TBUDLreplytemp aShould TBUDLreplytemp be showing? It does at my end. No, it shouldn't. Yes it does :D I think you have the literal string in the template. Just delete it. --

Re: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread azrael
TBUDLreplytemp On Friday, April 20, 2001, at 6:58:44 PM, Chema Berian thoughtfully wrote: aShould TBUDLreplytemp be showing? It does at my end. CB No, it shouldn't. Yes it does :D CB I think you have the literal string in the CB template. Just delete it. This is what shows in the

Re[2]: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread Chema Berian
Hello Listers, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, at 19:31:01 [GMT -0400] (which was next day at 1:31 where I live) azrael wrote: a This is what shows in the template. Delete which please? a On %ODATE, at a %OTIMELONG, %OFROMNAME wrote: a %WRAPPED="%QUOTES" a %CURSOR a %SINGLERE Sorry if I

Re: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread azrael
On Friday, April 20, 2001, at 7:48:56 PM, Chema Berian thoughtfully wrote: CB Sorry if I sound irritating but Are u completely sure CB "TBUDLreplytemp" or any other text (including macro) is not before "On CB %ODATE, at %OTIMELONG, %OFROMNAME wrote:"??? You're

Re[2]: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread Chema Berian
Hello Listers, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, at 19:58:37 [GMT -0400] (which was next day at 1:58 where I live) azrael wrote: aI deleted it and hope it remains gone. It seems to me that is has gone. Did u change the template around 18:00 PM (your time)? Last message before that time has the

Re: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread azrael
On Friday, April 20, 2001, at 8:16:22 PM, Chema Berian thoughtfully wrote: CB It seems to me that is has gone. CB Did u change the template around 18:00 PM CB (your time)? CB Last message before that time has the CB expresion: CB "Friday, April 20, 2001, 4:23:26 PM, you CB kindly wrote:"

Re: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread A Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 20 Apr 2001 19:58:37 -0400, azrael thoughtfully wrote the following: CB Sorry if I sound irritating but Are u completely CB sure "TBUDLreplytemp" or any other text (including macro) is not CB before "On %ODATE, at %OTIMELONG,

Re[2]: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread Chema Berian
Hello Listers, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, at 19:13:13 [GMT -0500] (which was next day at 2:13 where I live) Allie wrote: ACM I was referring to the Re:[] numbering and not 'TBUDLreplytemp' showing. Well, they are both gone :D -- Chema Berian mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP keys available:

Re: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread azrael
On Friday, April 20, 2001, at 8:34:59 PM, Chema Berian thoughtfully wrote: CB Well, they are both gone :D Chema; I love it. : D . Friday night and we're emailing about e-mail. : ( ./michael -- __ Archives :