Hi Michael,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:39:24 +0100 Michael Thompson wrote:
Maybe, only maybe, I'll rewrite the whole stuff one day; chances are I
have a little more spare time starting with September. But I guarantee
for nothing; neither the program nor the further development ATM :-)
Not bad,
Hello Mark,
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 at 7:24:34 AM you [MW] wrote (at least in
part):
There is Peter Palmreuther's 'TB Log Analyzer'.
TF I must have missed that one. Where can I find it?
MW Ditto here... Peter? You listening?
I am. ... Well ... if somebody /really/ want's to have a look
Peter-
Thanks muchly. I'll have a look.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
--
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, at 09:39:05 [GMT +0200] (which was 08:39 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
PP Maybe, only maybe, I'll rewrite the whole stuff one day; chances are I
PP have a little more spare time starting with September. But I guarantee
PP for nothing; neither the program nor the
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:39:05 +0200 GMT (30/07/03, 14:39 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
I am. ... Well ... if somebody /really/ want's to have a look at this
ugly piece of sh^hoftware: it's unaltered since Jan 2002 (the (c) even
only states something about 2001 *uaa*):
Hi
I have an account that I use for mailing lists, which has a large (100+) number
of (generally exclusive) filters active, and which receives anything up to 200
mails a day. Would it serve any beneficial purpose to sort the filters according
to their relative usage to 'streamline' the
On Mon 28-Jul-03 3:40am -0400, Colin Turner wrote:
I have an account that I use for mailing lists, which has a large (100+) number
of (generally exclusive) filters active, and which receives anything up to 200
mails a day. Would it serve any beneficial purpose to sort the filters according
Hello Adam,
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 20:11:54 -0230 GMT (30/07/03, 05:41 +0700 GMT),
Adam wrote:
I know that the Account Log records the firing of any filter, but are there any
other locations that TB keeps statistics on the firing of filters, which I could
use to determine the relative ordering?
On Tue 29-Jul-03 7:56pm -0400, Bill McCarthy wrote:
What's wrong with ACCOUNT.LOG? There's enough info there to grab the
filters passed and the location moved for each message. For my setup,
I generally figure about a half K per message - so a 200k log limit
(account-]properties-]options)
There is Peter Palmreuther's 'TB Log Analyzer'.
TF I must have missed that one. Where can I find it?
Ditto here... Peter? You listening?
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2
--
Current
Hi
I have an account that I use for mailing lists, which has a large (100+) number
of (generally exclusive) filters active, and which receives anything up to 200
mails a day. Would it serve any beneficial purpose to sort the filters according
to their relative usage to 'streamline' the inbox
Hello Colin,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 08:40:20 +0100 GMT (28/07/03, 14:40 +0700 GMT),
Colin Turner wrote:
I have an account that I use for mailing lists, which has a large (100+) number
of (generally exclusive) filters active, and which receives anything up to 200
mails a day. Would it serve
12 matches
Mail list logo
