Re: Filter logic

2001-01-31 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 31 January 2001 at 09:14:33 -0500 (which was 14:14 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points: Marck If you didn't do as I have explained above then it may not Marck have worked. JR But I did do what you explained

Re[2]: Filter logic

2001-01-31 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Marck, On Wednesday, January 31, 2001 14:41:33 [ + GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Filter logic': Marck The only other thing I can think of os that we're talking Marck about the Alt key on the left of the keyboard and not the Marck AltGr key. [...] I'm not sure what you

Re: Filter logic

2001-01-31 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 31 January 2001 at 09:58:22 -0500 (which was 14:58 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points: Marck The only other thing I can think of os that we're talking Marck about the Alt key on the left of the keyboard and not

Re[2]: Filter logic

2001-01-31 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Marck, On Wednesday, January 31, 2001 15:10:42 [ + GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Filter logic': JR Was I to use the left "ALT" vs the right "ALT"? Marck Yes. Absolutely. They are different keys. JR Maybe this is another one of those keyboard mapp

Filter logic

2001-01-30 Thread Tony Owens
Can someone explain the logic used when using multiple 'AN'D and 'OR' filter strings? As far as I can tell, the alternative filter(s) does not seem to be associated with any particular 'AND' filter.I think Marck Pearlstone touched on this in a previous post, but I didn't really understand it.

Re: Filter logic

2001-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Tony, On 30 January 2001 at 14:57:44 -0500 (which was 19:57 where I live) Tony Owens wrote and made these points: TO For instance, if I define two AND filters (say, A AND B), and a TO single 'OR' (alternative) filter, C, how is the whole

Re[2]: Filter logic

2001-01-30 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Marck, Sorry to jump in on this thread but On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 20:33:46 [ + GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Filter logic': Marck If you have 3 filters on the first page (A, B, C) and 2 sets on the Marck alternatives pages (D, E) and (F) then the logic

Re: Filter logic

2001-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 30 January 2001 at 15:55:01 -0500 (which was 20:55 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points: Marck If you have 3 filters on the first page (A, B, C) and 2 sets on the Marck alternatives pages (D, E) and (F) then the

Re[2]: Filter logic

2001-01-30 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Marck, On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 21:25:40 [ + GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Filter logic': Marck and then, on the Alternatives, we have two sets Marck _ Marck |D_|??_|Yes___| Marck |E_

Re: Filter logic

2001-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 30 January 2001 at 18:15:33 -0500 (which was 23:15 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points: JR ... If I understand this correctly, I could make a Rule that JR required A B C or (alternatively) required (D E) Set 1

Re[2]: Filter logic

2001-01-30 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Marck, On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 01:14:23 [ + GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'Filter logic': Marck [...] Secondary and tertiary ANDs are achieved with Alt-Ins Marck (to add additional - aka AND - filter strings) within Marck alternate sets. Create alternate set D

Re: Filter logic

2001-01-30 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jan, On 31 January 2001 at 20:50:07 -0500 (which was 01:50 where I live) Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these points: JR Sorry, I'm feeling very thick tonight. I think I followed your JR instructions: JR created a new filter Yes. JR