Hello Raymund,
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:43:45 +0200 GMT (25/Sep/10, 15:43 PM +0700 GMT),
Raymund Tump wrote:
>> What's the story with the "Inbox - Known" folder?
RT> Well, there should be a Known filter in your sorting office. That
RT> would move all messages t
Hi :
What's the story with the "Inbox - Known" folder?
Thanks.
Regards,
Gary Odom
g...@waterfire.us
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 you wrote in
PM> There is a new version of Voyager, based on The Bat! 3.81.14 Beta.
You had me all excited there for a minute until I realised that it's not
exactly new and it's the one I have already installed :-(
--
Regards,
Richard
| The Bat! 3.81.17 RC1.
Hi Andrew,
on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:08:58 -0600GMT (30.08.2006, 21:08 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
AAD> Mystery solved, thanks! Outside of mail lists most of the mail I get
AD> is from known people, so I don't think I'll wind up using it. If
AD> Inbox - Known was just a referenc
Hello Chris,
Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 7:38:25 PM, you wrote:
> Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM
> "What is Inbox - Known for?"
>> I have a folder called "Inbox - Known" in one of my two accounts,
>> but nothing is in it. I can't figure out
Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM
"What is Inbox - Known for?"
> I have a folder called "Inbox - Known" in one of my two accounts,
> but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it,
> either. It does look like a system generated folder.
Hello Batfolk,
I have a folder called "Inbox - Known" in one of my two accounts, but
nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it, either.
It does look like a system generated folder. What's it for?
Thanks for the help.
--
Andrew Diederich
Using Voyager v3
Hello,
Sunday, June 11, 2006, 7:48:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I put my cursor on Inbox-Known, and go to Account Properties, the
> "Common Folder Properties" comes up. In that Properties box, all I get
> are Options, Templates, Memo and Chat. Under Template
Sunday, June 11, 2006, Robert D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Generally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] foretold :
z>> How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation
z>> Request?
> I believe you can set it in Properties of Inbox-Known :
> Templates | Over-ride | Ignor
Generally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] foretold :
z> How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation
z> Request?
I believe you can set it in Properties of Inbox-Known :
Templates | Over-ride | Ignore
--
Regards,
Robert D.
:flag-us-ky:
_
The Bat! Version: 3
Two questions on Inbox-Known:
1. When my cursor in on Inbox-Known and I on New Message, the account
that is being used is Account1234, by default. I don't recall setting
the account to be used for Inbox-known. Is there a way to set the
default account to another account? [I don't kn
Hi
On Sunday 4 December 2005 at 9:19:52 PM, in
, Roelof Otten wrote:
M>> You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
> IIRC that depends on whether the known filter is active or not.
Only tried once and it came back. I expect the filter was active
because I think I have never alter
Hallo MFPA,
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 21:04:28 +GMT (4-12-2005, 22:04 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
>> I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
>> think Ill just delete it.
M> You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
IIRC that depends on whether the known
Hello MFPA,
Sunday, December 4, 2005, 1:04:28 PM, you wrote:
M> You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
Nope. Didnt show up.
--
Darrin
Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Current version is 3.6
Hi
On Sunday 4 December 2005 at 12:46:39 PM, in
, Darrin wrote:
> I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
> think Ill just delete it.
You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
--
Best regards,
MFPA
We are all in the gutte
Hello Roelof,
Sunday, December 4, 2005, 12:30:56 AM, you wrote:
RO> My own inbox-known is rarely used for the
RO> latter reason, hardly any message from people in my AB gets past my
RO> real filters.
I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
think Ill just
actually showing up in my inbox-known
D> folder. What do you suppose is wrong here?
I guess your known filter could be inactive or all messages could be
processed by other filters. My own inbox-known is rarely used for the
latter reason, hardly any message from people in my AB gets past my
Hello friends,
In my address book I have some listed in the default personal address
book. Others listed in different groups. I dont notice emails from any
of the people in my address book actually showing up in my inbox-known
folder. What do you suppose is wrong here?
--
Darrin
Using The Bat
oomba, then somebody else did; I persevered with Poco. What a waste of
a year.
Now, I've just gone through my ten accounts and activated the 'inbox - known'
filter but on one of those accounts (the third to be stet up) it was missing.
Not a great problem - I just created it, but d
Hello Jeff,
Saturday, June 18, 2005, 1:18:07 AM, you wrote:
> The condition is:
> Address Book Contains Sender
> Action is:
> Move To The Folder (folder name)
Great! Thank you much :)
--
Best regards,
Darrin
Hello Group
On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 3:00:48 AM, Darrin wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
> Friday, June 17, 2005, 8:22:23 AM, you wrote:
>> The fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
>> filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked.
> I checked and nothing. I know ho
Hello Thomas,
Friday, June 17, 2005, 8:22:23 AM, you wrote:
> The fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
> filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked.
I checked and nothing. I know how to re-create the known inbox, but
how do I re-create the filter?
Thanks
-
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 11:23:05 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
DAC>> I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP.
> Oh sorry. I don't know about IMAP, I was talking about POP.
I don't know either. Figured the only to learn whether that was
because of the differences, or whether it was an oversig
Hello Dwight,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:50:52 -0500 GMT (17/06/2005, 22:50 +0700 GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC> I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP.
Oh sorry. I don't know about IMAP, I was talking about POP.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Ladies, don't forget the rummage sale. It is a good chan
Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else,
on 17-Jun-2005 at 17:56 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
> sending the send button
That button didn't arrive here yet, however... ;-)
SCNR!
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Deliplayer2 is playing: "Dub Angel" (3:49) by
nd on further reflection, immediately after sending the send button
on last message, notice there is no inbox-known created for that
account.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using The Bat! 3.5.27 o
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 10:22:23 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> The fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
> filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked.
I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP. I have created a few
local filters for my new IMAP account, s
Hello Darrin,
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:20:24 -0700 GMT (17/06/2005, 09:20 +0700 GMT),
Darrin wrote:
D> It is the latter. I happen to look in the sorting office and there is
D> no filters for known senders. So I guess I have to create one?
The fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
f
led "" (without the quotes). You are not
really missing anything important - I have mine
disabled.
I created my own called "known" with put messages not
with me as a sender (I'm in the address book) AND with
the sender in the address book. The actions is to move
to Inbox-kn
Hello Bill,
Thursday, June 16, 2005, 7:06:15 PM, you wrote:
> If it is the latter, run Test Filters on a mail that
> should have gone there. Is it going somewhere else?
> If nothing is being triggered, make sure there is a
> sender address that is really in your address book and
> the filter i
On Thu 16-Jun-05 8:21pm -0500, Darrin wrote:
> I thought that all mail from users in my address book will go into
> "inbox-known" automatically. Doesnt seem to work. Is there something
> I must do to get this working?
What do you mean by "doesn't seem to work?
Hello TBUDL,
I thought that all mail from users in my address book will go into
"inbox-known" automatically. Doesnt seem to work. Is there something
I must do to get this working?
--
Best regards,
Darrin
Current version
Hi Paul,
On 7/22/2004 12:10 PM my time, Paul wrote:
PC> I think if you add a folder called $KNOWN$
PC> that will add it back.
PC> when I right-click an accounts inbox-known, the name shows as :
PC> $KNOWN$
PC> with the "$" on both sides.
That did the trick thanks :
Hello Darrin,
DR> Anyone know how to get it back?
DR> Thanks
I think if you add a folder called $KNOWN$
that will add it back.
when I right-click an accounts inbox-known, the name shows as :
$KNOWN$
with the "$" on both sides.
--
Bes
Hello,
Anyone know how to get it back?
Thanks
--
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00
pgpdGJieGYy2z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current version is 2.12.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInf
Hello Marck,
MDP> There is no definitive list that I know of. We'll have to beg for a
MDP> straight answer from one of the programmers. Maybe we should ask on
MDP> TBBETA?
The list is right. Currently, From, Reply-To, Return-Path and Sender
fields are used. I've seen the message from Bill about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Audiac,
@19-Jul-2003, 19:31 +0200 (18:31 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [A] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>> So I will never use a black list to determine spam. So far I am
>> still trying to get something bayesian that will work for me. I
>> have
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 10:37:12 PM, MikeD wrote:
> So I will never use a black list to determine spam. So far I am still
> trying to get something bayesian that will work for me. I have hopes
> for the new bayesian plug-in for TB.
Does anyone have any more information on this plugin? For insta
Hello Bill,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:14:54 -0400 GMT (17/07/03, 11:14 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote:
>> I have a question to those who have their own address in their AB:
>> What is the reason?
> For both BCCing and test mails to myself. I don't like auto complete
> turned on. It's much easie
On Wed 16-Jul-03 7:01pm -0400, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I have a question to those who have their own address in their AB:
> What is the reason? - If you keep BBC'ing yourself, you type your own
> address into the BBC field once, and the history function will always
> autocomplete (faster than d
On Wed 16-Jul-03 5:22pm -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote:
> Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 4:31:36 PM, Bill wrote:
B>> I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and
B>> Return-Path: but I didn't find a definitive list. Have I
B>> missed any?
> I checked the spams that leaked through and they all have m
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 7:01:34 PM, Thomas wrote:
T> I have a question to those who have their own address in their
T> AB: What is the reason?
My reasons are pretty simple. I have many mail groups - tennis
team, swim team board, basketball board, school parents, etc.
(Hmmm. There's a theme there
Hello Dave,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:22:53 -0400 GMT (17/07/03, 04:22 +0700 GMT),
Dave Kennedy wrote:
> So, now the question becomes - what next? Hmmm. I looked at the
> suggestion of creating my own Known filter, but the choice in the
> Location column is TB!'s generic (and pervasive) Sender. Look
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 4:31:36 PM, Bill wrote:
B> I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and
B> Return-Path: but I didn't find a definitive list. Have I
B> missed any?
I checked the spams that leaked through and they all have my
e-mail in the Return-Path. Looks like that's the culprit.
Hello Bill,
> Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics returned?
Not rally, I didn't read them all. I didn't even count them like you
did.
> I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and Return-Path: but I
> didn't find a definitive list. Have I missed any?
I think you are
On Wed 16-Jul-03 4:37pm -0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
> @16-Jul-2003, 16:31 -0400 (21:31 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
>>> And what is "sender"? Help/Find/sender :)
BM>> Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics
BM>> returned?
BM>> I know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bill,
@16-Jul-2003, 16:31 -0400 (21:31 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
>> And what is "sender"? Help/Find/sender :)
BM> Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics
BM> returned?
BM> I know Sender c
On Wed 16-Jul-03 3:56pm -0400, MAU wrote:
> And what is "sender"? Help/Find/sender :)
Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics returned?
I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and Return-Path: but I
didn't find a definitive list. Have I missed any?
--
Best regards,
Bi
Hello Alexander,
> 16-Jul-2003 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer you don't quote my e-mail address in the body.
Thanks,
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TB
Hello Alexander,
> What Dave Kennedy wants to know is which fields of a message DOES the Known
> filter compare with the given address book?
>
> You know, FROM, TO, REPLY-TO, etc. etc.
Ah, that? I didn't know he was asking that ;-)
It's the Sender's address. At least that is what the Known filte
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 11:53:18 AM, Alexander wrote:
A> 16-Jul-2003 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A> What Dave Kennedy wants to know is which fields of a message
A> DOES the Known filter compare with the given address book?
A> You know, FROM, TO, REPLY-TO, etc. etc.
Thank you! I'm glad some
16-Jul-2003 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm telling you but you don't belive me. The reason for the leaks is you
> put your Known filter first :-)
What Dave Kennedy wants to know is which fields of a message DOES the Known
filter compare with the given address book?
You know, FROM, TO, REP
Hello Dave,
M>> Anyway, if you put your Known filter first, you will see some
M>> spam messages "leaking through" as you say in your original
M>> post.
>
> I don't mind the leaking per se; it's not understanding the
> reason for the leak that is keeping me awake nights. :)
I'm telling you but you
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 5:54:23 PM, Allie wrote:
A> This thread has now been declared DEAD . as in DEAD
A> HORSE!!
I wasn't trying to get a POPFile/SpamPal battle going.
What I'm trying to do is learn what the logic/algorithm is that
TB! uses for the Known filter. If that could be answere
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 4:13:58 PM, MAU wrote:
M> Loose messages No matter what method, program, filter,
M> whatever, you use to detect spam you should not delete or
M> trash spam (initially flagged as spam) messages until you
M> somehow review them. There are always false positives and
M> fal
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 4:07:53 PM, WL wrote:
W> Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:28:47 PM, Dave Kennedy wrote:
DK>> I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes people I want to
DK>> get e-mail from will send a note that has spam-like material
DK>> in it.
W> ...but that defeats the purpose of "training ma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Morse, [JM] wrote:
JM> whoops I thought you were saying that it didn't work.
JM> I see you said "not because it didn't work"
JM> My Appologies!
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person being r
Hello John, you wrote:
>> well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work
> LOL, yeaH right
> I guess not all software is idiot-proof
whoops I thought you were saying that it didn't work.
I see you said "not because it didn't work"
My Appologies!
--
John Morse
pagemaker -at- sem
Hello MikeD, you wrote:
> The problem with 'black lists' is that inevitably there are a lot of
> people on them that should not be.
Did you know that you can "un-check" this feature from SpamPal if you do not wish to
use it?
--
John Morse
pagemaker -at- semo -dot- net
Hello Paul, you wrote:
> well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work
LOL, yeaH right
I guess not all software is idiot-proof
--
John Morse
pagemaker -at- semo -dot- net
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http:/
Hello Terry, you wrote:
> And, at 99% + accuracy, Popfile makes it really easy for me to stick
> to my principles. :)
This is always the main point that Popfile users stick too.
I too (although losing many "good" emails) was assured by Popfile itself that it
was doing such a
good job why
Hello MAU, you wrote:
> Can I say that I doubt it? :-)
Yes, you can, but have you tried SpamPal?
I can honestly say I have used both!
And Popfile's stats will fool you, believe me I know, I used Popfile.
Popfile uses only Bayesian, SpamPal uses a combination of effective spam fighting
techniques.
Hello neurowerx,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:32:42 PM, you wrote:
nwd> 15-Jul-2003 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I don't know about other Bayesian filters but for POPFile, for example
>> IP addresses are just "words" that it can use to classify messages. And
>> it sure does learn and use IP l
Hello Terry,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:03:03 PM, you wrote:
T> I use Popfile alone because it *doesn't* use DNS blacklists. I have
T> philosophical issues with DNS blacklists. And, at 99% + accuracy,
T> Popfile makes it really easy for me to stick to my principles. :)
This is not directed at Te
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 4:19 PM, you wrote:
nwd> 15-Jul-2003 22:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work, but because
>> I finally noticed that the slowdown in receiving mail was only on the
>> accounts that had spampal setup. Now I am back t
15-Jul-2003 22:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work, but because
> I finally noticed that the slowdown in receiving mail was only on the
> accounts that had spampal setup. Now I am back to getting my mail FAST.
I'd say that depends on how freq
Hello Dave,
> I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes people I want to get
> e-mail from will send a note that has spam-like material in it. I
> don't want to lose those messages.
Loose messages No matter what method, program, filter, whatever, you
use to detect spam you should not delete
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:28:47 PM, Dave Kennedy wrote:
DK> Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 3:09:00 PM, MAU wrote:
M>> Are you using any filter to sort messages classified as spam
M>> by POPFile? If so, this filter should be placed _before_ the
M>> Known filter.
DK> I've got the Known filter first. Somet
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 3:19 PM, you wrote:
>> SpamPal also makes less mistakes than PopFile.
M> Can SpamPal do much better than 99,71% accuracy? I doubt it, because
M> even 100% isn't that much more ;-)
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work, but because
I finally notic
Hello neurowerx,
> Good point. However, I believe that DNS blacklists are updated faster than
> popfile will "learn" IP addresses when you teach them manually.
I don't teach IPs to POPFile. It learns by itself. The only thing I tell
POPFile is if a message it has classified as spam and it isn't,
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 at 6:38 PM, neurowerx wrote:
> I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only
> measure again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal
> "alone" (DNS blacklist feature). I only use the Bayesian plugin to
> Spampal as an addition (the few mail
15-Jul-2003 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't know about other Bayesian filters but for POPFile, for example
> IP addresses are just "words" that it can use to classify messages. And
> it sure does learn and use IP lists.
Good point. However, I believe that DNS blacklists are updated fast
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 3:09:00 PM, MAU wrote:
M> Are you using any filter to sort messages classified as spam
M> by POPFile? If so, this filter should be placed _before_ the
M> Known filter.
I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes people I want to get
e-mail from will send a note that has spam
Hello John,
> But imagine my surprise... Now I have to say, without a doubt, that
> SpamPal is better than PopFile.
Can I say that I doubt it? :-)
> SpamPal also makes less mistakes than PopFile.
Can SpamPal do much better than 99,71% accuracy? I doubt it, because
even 100% isn't that much more
Hello neurowerx,
> I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
> again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal "alone" (DNS
> blacklist feature).
Because, for example in my case, I'm getting a 99.71 accuracy with
POPFile alone which, as you probably know,
Hello Dave,
> The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
> through, and I suspect that the Inbox-Known filtering is causing
> it to trigger. But, I'm not sure of the details of the
> Inbox-Known algorithm to debug this issue.
Are you using any filter
On Tue 15-Jul-03 12:52pm -0400, MikeD wrote:
> The problem is that enough spammers have figured this out and they are
> spoofing your address so that (assuming, presumably, that you list
> yourself in your address book ) it is not as clear as it was. I
> recently had to take my address out of my a
Hello neurowerx, you wrote:
> I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
> again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal "alone" (DNS
> blacklist feature). I only use the Bayesian plugin to Spampal as an
> addition (the few mails that get thru first place
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 12:52:27 PM, MikeD wrote:
M> Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:49:16 AM, Dave K wrote:
DK>> What is the logic for the "Inbox - Known" automatic
DK>> filtering in conjunction with the address book?
M> The problem is that enough spammers have figu
15-Jul-2003 15:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The related problem is some POPFile identified spam
Just a thought about "combined measures"...
I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal "alone" (DNS
blacklist
Hello Dave,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:49:16 AM, you wrote:
DK> What is the logic for the "Inbox - Known" automatic filtering in
DK> conjunction with the address book?
DK> The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
DK> through, and I suspect that the In
What is the logic for the "Inbox - Known" automatic filtering in
conjunction with the address book?
The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
through, and I suspect that the Inbox-Known filtering is causing
it to trigger. But, I'm not sure of the details of
Sh'mae Andy,
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, at 23:52:31 [GMT +0100] (23:52 where I live) you wrote:
AM> Hello list
AM> Probably a stupid question, but what is the purpose of the
AM> "Inbox-Known" folder which was created automatically on
AM> installation?
There is
Hello list
Probably a stupid question, but what is the purpose of the
"Inbox-Known" folder which was created automatically on
installation?
--
Best regards,
Andy
Current version is 1.61 | &q
On Monday, June 17, 2002, 18:21, Joseph N. wrote:
> I cannot delete the filter. The folder's long gone, and the 'remove'
> button in the Sorting Office is grayed out for the 'Known' filter.
Same here. I think I deleted it somewhere during the beta series,
haven't looked at it since. Sorry, sho
Hello Miles!
On Friday, June 14, 2002 at 9:03:31 PM you wrote:
> It boggles the mind that several WEEKS after this (potentially very
> useful) feature is implemented there's still NOTHING on the updated
> program's FAQ.
The FAQ does not come from RITLabs.
> And please, please don't tell us tha
Hey Miles,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.53d) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 3:03:31 PM.
TM>> [+] The incoming mail filter for moving messages from
TM>> known senders to a special folder so the Inbox can be left for
TM>> unknown senders and spam :-)
MJ> Wel
It seems that Miles Johnson said ...
M> I'm sticking to 1.53... Do others feel the same way?
In a word, no.
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
--
Bill Blinn, Technology Editor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - 6/14/2002 at 3:31 PM
Technology Corner on Newsradio 610 WTVN, Columbus, Ohio
TM> [+] The incoming mail filter for moving messages from known
TM> senders to a special folder so the Inbox can be left for unknown
TM> senders and spam :-)
Well I've been trying to figure this out ever since it was implemented, seen
all kinds of people upset about this... It boggles the mind t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tim,
@14 June 2002, 11:20:14 -0400 (16:20 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JA>> As this question has been asked several times... might it not be a
JA>> nice addition to add to the FAQ (whoever maintains it?) ;
Hey Jonathan,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60c) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 11:16:22 AM.
JA> As this question has been asked several times... might it not be a
JA> nice addition to add to the FAQ (whoever maintains it?) ;)
Not a bad idea...
Marck?
Hey Alan,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 10:43:56 AM.
AL> Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
AL> I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named "Inbox -
AL> Known" in each of my accounts, just abo
On Friday, June 14, 2002, Alan Little wrote...
> Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
> I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named "Inbox -
> Known" in each of my accounts, just above the Inbox standard folder.
> What is this for? I can'
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named "Inbox -
Known" in each of my accounts, just above the Inbox standard folder.
What is this for? I can't find anything about it in the documentation.
--
Alan Little
Holot
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002 at 8:07:31 AM you wrote:
MSG>> and how I get rid of it if I don't want it?
> Don't know.
For all those who couldn't follow the lists in the past few weeks -
and those that don't know what an archive is:
Got to your Sorting Office and disable the filte
Hello Michael,
On Tue, 21 May 2002 18:25:04 -0700 GMT (22/05/02, 08:25 +0700 GMT),
Michael S. Greenbaum wrote:
MSG> Is this a problem on my computer or with the program?
It's not a problem, it's a new feature.
MSG> Meanwhile, can anyone tell me what this Inbox-Known is, why
Ta-dah!
I've found the cause and thought I should share with community and
developers, so here goes. Many thanks to all that responded with
ideas, too!
It turns out that during some aspect of the upgrade process from 1.53d
through 1.60h to 1.60j (current), and/or deleting my "Inb
Hello John.
At 1:03 PM on Friday, May 03, 2002 you wrote the following
about [separate Inbox-Known for each address book]:
John> I've split my address book into two - work folks and
John> personal folks. Can I make an "Inbox - Known" rule for
John> each address book?
On Sun, 5 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jonathan,
>
> JA> Not sure if this is helpful... Have you made sure that you have
> JA> the "Continue processing" set? I cannot remember the full name. It
> JA> may have become switched off some how... and as soon as it hits
> JA> that rule, it has no
Jonathan,
JA> Not sure if this is helpful... Have you made sure that you have
JA> the "Continue processing" set? I cannot remember the full name. It
JA> may have become switched off some how... and as soon as it hits
JA> that rule, it has no reason to continue processing.
The problem is actually
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
