Hi :
What's the story with the Inbox - Known folder?
Thanks.
Regards,
Gary Odom
g...@waterfire.us
Current version is 4.2.23 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Raymund,
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 10:43:45 +0200 GMT (25/Sep/10, 15:43 PM +0700 GMT),
Raymund Tump wrote:
What's the story with the Inbox - Known folder?
RT Well, there should be a Known filter in your sorting office. That
RT would move all messages that are from people in your addressbook
Hello Chris,
Tuesday, August 29, 2006, 7:38:25 PM, you wrote:
Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM
What is Inbox - Known for? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a folder called Inbox - Known in one of my two accounts,
but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it,
either
Hi Andrew,
on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:08:58 -0600GMT (30.08.2006, 21:08 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
AAD Mystery solved, thanks! Outside of mail lists most of the mail I get
AD is from known people, so I don't think I'll wind up using it. If
AD Inbox - Known was just a reference to the email
Hello Peter,
On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PM There is a new version of Voyager, based on The Bat! 3.81.14 Beta.
You had me all excited there for a minute until I realised that it's not
exactly new and it's the one I have already installed :-(
--
Regards,
Richard
|
Hello Batfolk,
I have a folder called Inbox - Known in one of my two accounts, but
nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it, either.
It does look like a system generated folder. What's it for?
Thanks for the help.
--
Andrew Diederich
Using Voyager v3.80.04 on Windows XP
Andrew Diederich @ 2006-8-29 8:30:02 PM
What is Inbox - Known for? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a folder called Inbox - Known in one of my two accounts,
but nothing is in it. I can't figure out what _should_ be in it,
either. It does look like a system generated folder. What's
Two questions on Inbox-Known:
1. When my cursor in on Inbox-Known and I on New Message, the account
that is being used is Account1234, by default. I don't recall setting
the account to be used for Inbox-known. Is there a way to set the
default account to another account? [I don't know whether
Generally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] foretold :
z How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation
z Request?
I believe you can set it in Properties of Inbox-Known :
Templates | Over-ride | Ignore
--
Regards,
Robert D.
:flag-us-ky:
_
The Bat! Version: 3.80.06
Sunday, June 11, 2006, Robert D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Generally, [EMAIL PROTECTED] foretold :
z How can I get the Inbox-Known to ignor the Reading Confirmation
z Request?
I believe you can set it in Properties of Inbox-Known :
Templates | Over-ride | Ignore
I don't have over-ride
Hello,
Sunday, June 11, 2006, 7:48:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I put my cursor on Inbox-Known, and go to Account Properties, the
Common Folder Properties comes up. In that Properties box, all I get
are Options, Templates, Memo and Chat. Under Templates, I only have Save
Messages
Hi
On Sunday 4 December 2005 at 9:19:52 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:
M You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
IIRC that depends on whether the known filter is active or not.
Only tried once and it came back. I expect the filter was active
because I think
showing up in my inbox-known
D folder. What do you suppose is wrong here?
I guess your known filter could be inactive or all messages could be
processed by other filters. My own inbox-known is rarely used for the
latter reason, hardly any message from people in my AB gets past my
real filters
Hello Roelof,
Sunday, December 4, 2005, 12:30:56 AM, you wrote:
RO My own inbox-known is rarely used for the
RO latter reason, hardly any message from people in my AB gets past my
RO real filters.
I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
think Ill just delete
Hi
On Sunday 4 December 2005 at 12:46:39 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Darrin wrote:
I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
think Ill just delete it.
You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
--
Best regards,
MFPA
We
Hello MFPA,
Sunday, December 4, 2005, 1:04:28 PM, you wrote:
M You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
Nope. Didnt show up.
--
Darrin
Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Current version is
Hallo MFPA,
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 21:04:28 +GMT (4-12-2005, 22:04 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
I dont really think of any reason why I would need it anyway. So I
think Ill just delete it.
M You may find it re-created the next time you start TB!
IIRC that depends on whether the known
Hello friends,
In my address book I have some listed in the default personal address
book. Others listed in different groups. I dont notice emails from any
of the people in my address book actually showing up in my inbox-known
folder. What do you suppose is wrong here?
--
Darrin
Using The Bat
, then somebody else did; I persevered with Poco. What a waste of
a year.
Now, I've just gone through my ten accounts and activated the 'inbox - known'
filter but on one of those accounts (the third to be stet up) it was missing.
Not a great problem - I just created it, but does anyone know what
Hello Group
On Saturday, June 18, 2005, 3:00:48 AM, Darrin wrote:
Hello Thomas,
Friday, June 17, 2005, 8:22:23 AM, you wrote:
The Known fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked.
I checked and nothing. I know how
Hello Jeff,
Saturday, June 18, 2005, 1:18:07 AM, you wrote:
The condition is:
Address Book Contains Sender
Action is:
Move To The Folder (folder name)
Great! Thank you much :)
--
Best regards,
Darrin
Hello Darrin,
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:20:24 -0700 GMT (17/06/2005, 09:20 +0700 GMT),
Darrin wrote:
D It is the latter. I happen to look in the sorting office and there is
D no filters for known senders. So I guess I have to create one?
The Known fitler should be there by default under the
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 10:22:23 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
The Known fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked.
I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP. I have created a few
local filters for my new IMAP
, immediately after sending the send button
on last message, notice there is no inbox-known created for that
account.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using The Bat! 3.5.27 on Windows XP version 5,1
Hello Dwight A Corrin everyone else,
on 17-Jun-2005 at 17:56 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote:
sending the send button
That button didn't arrive here yet, however... ;-)
SCNR!
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Deliplayer2 is playing: Dub Angel (3:49) by
Hello Dwight,
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:50:52 -0500 GMT (17/06/2005, 22:50 +0700 GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
DAC I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP.
Oh sorry. I don't know about IMAP, I was talking about POP.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Ladies, don't forget the rummage sale. It is a good
On Friday, June 17, 2005, 11:23:05 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
DAC I recently made the switch from POP to IMAP.
Oh sorry. I don't know about IMAP, I was talking about POP.
I don't know either. Figured the only to learn whether that was
because of the differences, or whether it was an
Hello Thomas,
Friday, June 17, 2005, 8:22:23 AM, you wrote:
The Known fitler should be there by default under the Incoming
filters. It has a tickbox for Active - maybe yours is not ticked.
I checked and nothing. I know how to re-create the known inbox, but
how do I re-create the filter?
Hello TBUDL,
I thought that all mail from users in my address book will go into
inbox-known automatically. Doesnt seem to work. Is there something
I must do to get this working?
--
Best regards,
Darrin
Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using
On Thu 16-Jun-05 8:21pm -0500, Darrin wrote:
I thought that all mail from users in my address book will go into
inbox-known automatically. Doesnt seem to work. Is there something
I must do to get this working?
What do you mean by doesn't seem to work?
Are mails going into inbox-known
Hello Bill,
Thursday, June 16, 2005, 7:06:15 PM, you wrote:
If it is the latter, run Test Filters on a mail that
should have gone there. Is it going somewhere else?
If nothing is being triggered, make sure there is a
sender address that is really in your address book and
the known filter
anything important - I have mine
disabled.
I created my own called known with put messages not
with me as a sender (I'm in the address book) AND with
the sender in the address book. The actions is to move
to Inbox-known and it is active.
--
Best regards,
Bill
The Wounded Bat 3.5.27 Pro BayesIt
Hello,
Anyone know how to get it back?
Thanks
--
Darrin
WinXP Home Service Pack 1
Tbat! 2.12.00
pgpdGJieGYy2z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current version is 2.12.02 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Hello Darrin,
DR Anyone know how to get it back?
DR Thanks
I think if you add a folder called $KNOWN$
that will add it back.
when I right-click an accounts inbox-known, the name shows as :
$KNOWN$
with the $ on both sides.
--
Best regards,
Paul
Hi Paul,
On 7/22/2004 12:10 PM my time, Paul wrote:
PC I think if you add a folder called $KNOWN$
PC that will add it back.
PC when I right-click an accounts inbox-known, the name shows as :
PC $KNOWN$
PC with the $ on both sides.
That did the trick thanks :)
--
Darrin
WinXP Home Service
Hello Marck,
MDP There is no definitive list that I know of. We'll have to beg for a
MDP straight answer from one of the programmers. Maybe we should ask on
MDP TBBETA?
The list is right. Currently, From, Reply-To, Return-Path and Sender
fields are used. I've seen the message from Bill about
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 10:37:12 PM, MikeD wrote:
So I will never use a black list to determine spam. So far I am still
trying to get something bayesian that will work for me. I have hopes
for the new bayesian plug-in for TB.
Does anyone have any more information on this plugin? For
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Audiac,
@19-Jul-2003, 19:31 +0200 (18:31 UK time) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [A] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So I will never use a black list to determine spam. So far I am
still trying to get something bayesian that will work for me. I
have hopes
Hello Bill,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 00:14:54 -0400 GMT (17/07/03, 11:14 +0700 GMT),
Bill McCarthy wrote:
I have a question to those who have their own address in their AB:
What is the reason?
For both BCCing and test mails to myself. I don't like auto complete
turned on. It's much easier to
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 4:07:53 PM, WL wrote:
W Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:28:47 PM, Dave Kennedy wrote:
DK I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes people I want to
DK get e-mail from will send a note that has spam-like material
DK in it.
W ...but that defeats the purpose of training material.
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 4:13:58 PM, MAU wrote:
M Loose messages No matter what method, program, filter,
M whatever, you use to detect spam you should not delete or
M trash spam (initially flagged as spam) messages until you
M somehow review them. There are always false positives and
M false
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 5:54:23 PM, Allie wrote:
A This thread has now been declared DEAD . as in DEAD
A HORSE!!
I wasn't trying to get a POPFile/SpamPal battle going.
What I'm trying to do is learn what the logic/algorithm is that
TB! uses for the Known filter. If that could be
Hello Dave,
M Anyway, if you put your Known filter first, you will see some
M spam messages leaking through as you say in your original
M post.
I don't mind the leaking per se; it's not understanding the
reason for the leak that is keeping me awake nights. :)
I'm telling you but you don't
16-Jul-2003 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm telling you but you don't belive me. The reason for the leaks is you
put your Known filter first :-)
What Dave Kennedy wants to know is which fields of a message DOES the Known
filter compare with the given address book?
You know, FROM, TO,
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 11:53:18 AM, Alexander wrote:
A 16-Jul-2003 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A What Dave Kennedy wants to know is which fields of a message
A DOES the Known filter compare with the given address book?
A You know, FROM, TO, REPLY-TO, etc. etc.
Thank you! I'm glad someone
Hello Alexander,
What Dave Kennedy wants to know is which fields of a message DOES the Known
filter compare with the given address book?
You know, FROM, TO, REPLY-TO, etc. etc.
Ah, that? I didn't know he was asking that ;-)
It's the Sender's address. At least that is what the Known filter
Hello Alexander,
16-Jul-2003 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer you don't quote my e-mail address in the body.
Thanks,
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62r | Using
On Wed 16-Jul-03 3:56pm -0400, MAU wrote:
And what is sender? Help/Find/sender :)
Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics returned?
I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and Return-Path: but I
didn't find a definitive list. Have I missed any?
--
Best regards,
Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bill,
@16-Jul-2003, 16:31 -0400 (21:31 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
And what is sender? Help/Find/sender :)
BM Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics
BM returned?
BM I know Sender checks
On Wed 16-Jul-03 4:37pm -0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
@16-Jul-2003, 16:31 -0400 (21:31 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
And what is sender? Help/Find/sender :)
BM Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics
BM returned?
BM I know Sender
Hello Bill,
Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics returned?
Not rally, I didn't read them all. I didn't even count them like you
did.
I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and Return-Path: but I
didn't find a definitive list. Have I missed any?
I think you are
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 4:31:36 PM, Bill wrote:
B I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and
B Return-Path: but I didn't find a definitive list. Have I
B missed any?
I checked the spams that leaked through and they all have my
e-mail in the Return-Path. Looks like that's the culprit. I
Hello Dave,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:22:53 -0400 GMT (17/07/03, 04:22 +0700 GMT),
Dave Kennedy wrote:
So, now the question becomes - what next? Hmmm. I looked at the
suggestion of creating my own Known filter, but the choice in the
Location column is TB!'s generic (and pervasive) Sender. Looks
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 7:01:34 PM, Thomas wrote:
T I have a question to those who have their own address in their
T AB: What is the reason?
My reasons are pretty simple. I have many mail groups - tennis
team, swim team board, basketball board, school parents, etc.
(Hmmm. There's a theme
On Wed 16-Jul-03 5:22pm -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote:
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 4:31:36 PM, Bill wrote:
B I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and
B Return-Path: but I didn't find a definitive list. Have I
B missed any?
I checked the spams that leaked through and they all have my
On Wed 16-Jul-03 7:01pm -0400, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I have a question to those who have their own address in their AB:
What is the reason? - If you keep BBC'ing yourself, you type your own
address into the BBC field once, and the history function will always
autocomplete (faster than
What is the logic for the Inbox - Known automatic filtering in
conjunction with the address book?
The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
through, and I suspect that the Inbox-Known filtering is causing
it to trigger. But, I'm not sure of the details of the
Inbox-Known
Hello Dave,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:49:16 AM, you wrote:
DK What is the logic for the Inbox - Known automatic filtering in
DK conjunction with the address book?
DK The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
DK through, and I suspect that the Inbox-Known filtering
15-Jul-2003 15:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The related problem is some POPFile identified spam
Just a thought about combined measures...
I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal alone (DNS
blacklist
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 12:52:27 PM, MikeD wrote:
M Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:49:16 AM, Dave K wrote:
DK What is the logic for the Inbox - Known automatic
DK filtering in conjunction with the address book?
M The problem is that enough spammers have figured this out and
M they are spoofing your
Hello neurowerx, you wrote:
I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal alone (DNS
blacklist feature). I only use the Bayesian plugin to Spampal as an
addition (the few mails that get thru first place make
On Tue 15-Jul-03 12:52pm -0400, MikeD wrote:
The problem is that enough spammers have figured this out and they are
spoofing your address so that (assuming, presumably, that you list
yourself in your address book g) it is not as clear as it was. I
recently had to take my address out of my
Hello Dave,
The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
through, and I suspect that the Inbox-Known filtering is causing
it to trigger. But, I'm not sure of the details of the
Inbox-Known algorithm to debug this issue.
Are you using any filter to sort messages classified
Hello neurowerx,
I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal alone (DNS
blacklist feature).
Because, for example in my case, I'm getting a 99.71 accuracy with
POPFile alone which, as you probably know,
Hello John,
But imagine my surprise... Now I have to say, without a doubt, that
SpamPal is better than PopFile.
Can I say that I doubt it? :-)
SpamPal also makes less mistakes than PopFile.
Can SpamPal do much better than 99,71% accuracy? I doubt it, because
even 100% isn't that much more
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 3:09:00 PM, MAU wrote:
M Are you using any filter to sort messages classified as spam
M by POPFile? If so, this filter should be placed _before_ the
M Known filter.
I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes people I want to get
e-mail from will send a note that has
15-Jul-2003 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about other Bayesian filters but for POPFile, for example
IP addresses are just words that it can use to classify messages. And
it sure does learn and use IP lists.
Good point. However, I believe that DNS blacklists are updated faster
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 at 6:38 PM, neurowerx wrote:
I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only
measure again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal
alone (DNS blacklist feature). I only use the Bayesian plugin to
Spampal as an addition (the few mails
Hello neurowerx,
Good point. However, I believe that DNS blacklists are updated faster than
popfile will learn IP addresses when you teach them manually.
I don't teach IPs to POPFile. It learns by itself. The only thing I tell
POPFile is if a message it has classified as spam and it isn't, or
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 3:19 PM, you wrote:
SpamPal also makes less mistakes than PopFile.
M Can SpamPal do much better than 99,71% accuracy? I doubt it, because
M even 100% isn't that much more ;-)
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work, but because
I finally noticed
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:28:47 PM, Dave Kennedy wrote:
DK Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 3:09:00 PM, MAU wrote:
M Are you using any filter to sort messages classified as spam
M by POPFile? If so, this filter should be placed _before_ the
M Known filter.
DK I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes
Hello Dave,
I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes people I want to get
e-mail from will send a note that has spam-like material in it. I
don't want to lose those messages.
Loose messages No matter what method, program, filter, whatever, you
use to detect spam you should not delete
15-Jul-2003 22:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work, but because
I finally noticed that the slowdown in receiving mail was only on the
accounts that had spampal setup. Now I am back to getting my mail FAST.
I'd say that depends on how
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 4:19 PM, you wrote:
nwd 15-Jul-2003 22:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work, but because
I finally noticed that the slowdown in receiving mail was only on the
accounts that had spampal setup. Now I am back to
Hello Terry,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:03:03 PM, you wrote:
T I use Popfile alone because it *doesn't* use DNS blacklists. I have
T philosophical issues with DNS blacklists. And, at 99% + accuracy,
T Popfile makes it really easy for me to stick to my principles. :)
Moderator
This is not
Hello neurowerx,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:32:42 PM, you wrote:
nwd 15-Jul-2003 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about other Bayesian filters but for POPFile, for example
IP addresses are just words that it can use to classify messages. And
it sure does learn and use IP lists.
Hello MAU, you wrote:
Can I say that I doubt it? :-)
Yes, you can, but have you tried SpamPal?
I can honestly say I have used both!
And Popfile's stats will fool you, believe me I know, I used Popfile.
Popfile uses only Bayesian, SpamPal uses a combination of effective spam fighting
techniques.
Hello Terry, you wrote:
And, at 99% + accuracy, Popfile makes it really easy for me to stick
to my principles. :)
This is always the main point that Popfile users stick too.
I too (although losing many good emails) was assured by Popfile itself that it
was doing such a
good job why it
Hello Paul, you wrote:
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work
LOL, yeaH right
I guess not all software is idiot-proof
--
John Morse
pagemaker -at- semo -dot- net
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
Hello MikeD, you wrote:
The problem with 'black lists' is that inevitably there are a lot of
people on them that should not be.
Did you know that you can un-check this feature from SpamPal if you do not wish to
use it?
--
John Morse
pagemaker -at- semo -dot- net
Hello John, you wrote:
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work
LOL, yeaH right
I guess not all software is idiot-proof
whoops I thought you were saying that it didn't work.
I see you said not because it didn't work
My Appologies!
--
John Morse
pagemaker -at- semo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Morse, [JM] wrote:
JM whoops I thought you were saying that it didn't work.
JM I see you said not because it didn't work
JM My Appologies!
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person
Hello list
Probably a stupid question, but what is the purpose of the
Inbox-Known folder which was created automatically on
installation?
--
Best regards,
Andy
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL
Sh'mae Andy,
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, at 23:52:31 [GMT +0100] (23:52 where I live) you wrote:
AM Hello list
AM Probably a stupid question, but what is the purpose of the
AM Inbox-Known folder which was created automatically on
AM installation?
There is a special filter that can
On Monday, June 17, 2002, 18:21, Joseph N. wrote:
I cannot delete the filter. The folder's long gone, and the 'remove'
button in the Sorting Office is grayed out for the 'Known' filter.
Same here. I think I deleted it somewhere during the beta series,
haven't looked at it since. Sorry,
Hello Miles!
On Friday, June 14, 2002 at 9:03:31 PM you wrote:
It boggles the mind that several WEEKS after this (potentially very
useful) feature is implemented there's still NOTHING on the updated
program's FAQ.
The FAQ does not come from RITLabs.
And please, please don't tell us that
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named Inbox -
Known in each of my accounts, just above the Inbox standard folder.
What is this for? I can't find anything about it in the documentation.
--
Alan Little
Holotech Enterprises
On Friday, June 14, 2002, Alan Little wrote...
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named Inbox -
Known in each of my accounts, just above the Inbox standard folder.
What is this for? I can't find anything about
Hey Alan,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 10:43:56 AM.
AL Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
AL I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named Inbox -
AL Known in each of my accounts, just above
Hey Jonathan,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60c) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 11:16:22 AM.
JA As this question has been asked several times... might it not be a
JA nice addition to add to the FAQ (whoever maintains it?) ;)
Not a bad idea...
Marck?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tim,
@14 June 2002, 11:20:14 -0400 (16:20 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JA As this question has been asked several times... might it not be a
JA nice addition to add to the FAQ (whoever maintains it?) ;)
TM [+] The Known incoming mail filter for moving messages from known
TM senders to a special folder so the Inbox can be left for unknown
TM senders and spam :-)
Well I've been trying to figure this out ever since it was implemented, seen
all kinds of people upset about this... It boggles the
Hey Miles,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.53d) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 3:03:31 PM.
TM [+] The Known incoming mail filter for moving messages from
TM known senders to a special folder so the Inbox can be left for
TM unknown senders and spam :-)
MJ Well
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002 at 8:07:31 AM you wrote:
MSG and how I get rid of it if I don't want it?
Don't know.
For all those who couldn't follow the lists in the past few weeks -
and those that don't know what an archive is:
Got to your Sorting Office and disable the Known
Hello Michael,
On Tue, 21 May 2002 18:25:04 -0700 GMT (22/05/02, 08:25 +0700 GMT),
Michael S. Greenbaum wrote:
MSG Is this a problem on my computer or with the program?
It's not a problem, it's a new feature.
MSG Meanwhile, can anyone tell me what this Inbox-Known is, why I need it,
You can
Ta-dah!
I've found the cause and thought I should share with community and
developers, so here goes. Many thanks to all that responded with
ideas, too!
It turns out that during some aspect of the upgrade process from 1.53d
through 1.60h to 1.60j (current), and/or deleting my Inbox - Known
Jonathan,
JA Not sure if this is helpful... Have you made sure that you have
JA the Continue processing set? I cannot remember the full name. It
JA may have become switched off some how... and as soon as it hits
JA that rule, it has no reason to continue processing.
The problem is actually that
On Sun, 5 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan,
JA Not sure if this is helpful... Have you made sure that you have
JA the Continue processing set? I cannot remember the full name. It
JA may have become switched off some how... and as soon as it hits
JA that rule, it has no reason to
Hello John.
At 1:03 PM on Friday, May 03, 2002 you wrote the following
about [separate Inbox-Known for each address book]:
John I've split my address book into two - work folks and
John personal folks. Can I make an Inbox - Known rule for
John each address book?
I believe you can. Check
At Saturday, May 4, 2002, 4:15:31 AM, role+the wrote:
Hi,
I think the old bug-reporting changed, but I can't find or remember
where it goes now, so herewith my findings...
Just upgraded to 1.60h, running NT4.
I found I couldn't move the Inbox - Known folder into a sub-folder,
and it's
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
