Hello Richard,
Monday, November 29, 2004, 2:52:41 AM, you wrote:
I'm not worried about any problems with actually getting the virus. I
just would like TB! to quarantine it rather than delete them manually
when Avast catches them.
Then you probably have to exclude K9's temporary directory
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 21:11:23 +0100, Raymund Thomas Tump wrote:
Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will
store the mail for a time on the hard disk. That that is where Avast
can fetch it. But that would harm the mail delivery only if K9 sends
the mail from disk, which it
Hi Richard,
on Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:40:22 +0500GMT, you wrote:
RHS I'm trying out K9 ... However, it causes a problem for my AV
RHS plugin (Avast), which heretofore would flag viruses and
RHS automatically move them to the quarantine folder.
I used K9 before I installed Avast, and thus never
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 15:40:22 +0500, Richard H. Stoddard wrote:
Greetings:
I'm trying out K9 since BayesIt has dropped from an accuracy rate of
97% to less than 33% over the last few months. However, it causes a
problem for my AV plugin (Avast), which heretofore would flag viruses
and automatically
Hi Andre,
on Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:45:00 +0100GMT, you wrote:
it was a lot cleaner when the plugin just moved them automatically
to the quarantine folder. Is there any way to configure either K9,
TB!, or Avast to restore that functionality?
AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages as
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:58:14 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote:
I cannot find a
setting anywhere to move all infected mails to quarantine (or delete)
automatically either.
I have only v2 here but this is not plugin specific. I can set the option
even without an installed plugin. See
Hi Andre,
on Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:22:18 +0100GMT, you wrote:
AW On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 15:58:14 +0100, Peter Meyns wrote:
I cannot find a
setting anywhere to move all infected mails to quarantine (or delete)
automatically either.
AW I have only v2 here but this is not plugin specific. I can set
Hi Andre,
That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the
mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9
shouldn't make a difference at all.
Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will
store the mail for a time on the hard disk.
Andre,
Sunday, November 28, 2004, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote:
AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the
AW mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9
AW shouldn't make a difference at all. You mean the plugin catches it? And
AW what then? Is
Raymund,
Monday, November 29, 2004, 1:11:23 AM, you wrote:
RTT Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will
RTT store the mail for a time on the hard disk. That that is where Avast
RTT can fetch it. But that would harm the mail delivery only if K9 sends
RTT the mail from
Andre,
Sunday, November 28, 2004, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote:
AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the
AW mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9
AW shouldn't make a difference at all. You mean the plugin catches it? And
AW what then? Is
Hallo Richard,
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 06:50:07 +0500GMT (29-11-2004, 2:50 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RHS caught, but some days I get for or five per session, so prefer they be
RHS quarantined by TB! as before.
RHS
RHS Current version is
Greetings:
I'm trying out K9 since BayesIt has dropped from an accuracy rate of
97% to less than 33% over the last few months. However, it causes a
problem for my AV plugin (Avast), which heretofore would flag viruses
and automatically move them to the quarantine folder. Now when when
one comes
13 matches
Mail list logo