Re: (OT) LinuxBat now!

2000-04-17 Thread Steve Lamb
Saturday, April 15, 2000, 8:53:34 AM, Alexander wrote: Okay, my _own_ experience: AMD 5x86-133 CPU overclocked to 160 MHz, 16 Megs of RAM, Windows'95 OSR2 Russian (this is the system I had two years ago). Netscape 4 worked just fine, Opera... well, it kinda worked;-))) K6-200, 64Mb RAM,

Re: LinuxBat now!

2000-04-15 Thread Patrick Erler
hallo Christian! on Saturday, April 15, 2000, 5:44:29 AM, you wrote: CD Hello TBUDL, CD I prefer Linux, I NEED The Bat! for my work. How do we make this CD port happen? I mean, I work for Opera Software, we are doing a Linux CD port of our browser because we see a market there. CD The

Re[2]: LinuxBat now!

2000-04-15 Thread Christian Dysthe
Hello Patrick, Saturday, April 15, 2000, 2:10:46 AM, you wrote: PE hallo Christian! PE so do the following: talk to the guys at ritlab, help them porting, PE throw away (i mean FAR away) that kind of mail-client you wrote for PE opera (and throw that newsreader-part even further beyond the

Re: LinuxBat now!

2000-04-15 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 15 Apr 00, at 16:44, Arno van Stralen wrote about "Re[2]: LinuxBat now!": Opera Software, I agree, has been a bit - how am I going to put this politically correct :-) - too enthousiatic when proclaiming version 4.0. However, Opera is the leading browser on CSS