Re: MORE version questions

2004-09-04 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello rich, On 3 Sep 2004 at 13:17:44 -0400 GMT [19:17 CEST] you wrote: rg Anyone have comments on the 2.x versions at my (free) disposal? rg 2.04.7 - the version I am (still) on rg 2.11.02 - a version still available on the site for download rg 2.12 - a version still available on the

Re: MORE version questions

2004-09-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo rich, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 13:15:18 -0400GMT (3-9-2004, 19:15 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RO I think the improved filtering system is worth it. RG 2) I am also interested in trying out v3 *BUT* if I do not like it is RG there a sane roll-back method? RO As long as you don't change your

Re: MORE version questions

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Rich! On Wednesday, September 01, 2004, 10:56 AM, you wrote: rg 1) Anyone care to comment ... Well, I'll give it a try. Each person's needs and compelling reasons are different. It depends on what you want. I have run v. 2.12.00 and liked it very much, except for an unstable folder

Re: MORE version questions

2004-09-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo rich, On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 11:56:03 -0400GMT (1-9-2004, 17:56 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RG 1) Anyone care to comment on if they think there is compelling reason RG to upgrade from the version of TB! I am still using to either of the 2 RG available free 2.x upgrades? I think the