TB!. Also, it should continue to
generate MSGIDs since allowing the server to generate it reducing
functionality of TB!, most notably CNTL-BACKSPACE.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connecti
SL the part after the @ is nothing more than a static string for the purposes of
SL the whole. The Bat! should employ a stronger algorithm on the front end to
SL ensure unique addresses across instances of TB!. Also, it should continue to
SL generate MSGIDs since allowing the ser
Hello Steve,
SL As you can see the format appears to be as follows:
SL Date_and_time_String:MMDDhhmms.Random_number?@HOST
SL The addition of hhmmss reduces the chance of duplication greatly.
SL Also, the 2nd half of the string I'm not sure is entirely random,
SL either. I'm sure there
In a discussion on the PMMail mailing list the topic of Message-IDs came
up. I used TB!'s MSGIDs as an example of an MUA which generates its own
MSGIDs (PMMail does not do it currently). Here are some examples from my sent
mail, all messages sent in the past hour:
Message-ID: [EMAIL
4 matches
Mail list logo
