Re[2]: Message Flag Icon

2003-10-26 Thread rich gregory
MR> My 2 cents: I'd rather have the arrows. They are more intuitive. One of the main reasons I sought alternative GLYPHS.BMP files !! -- Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Message Flag Icon

2003-10-26 Thread Michael Rudnick
I've noticed that the Message Flag icon has a few more designs than before. Besides closed and open, there is a check mark that (I assume) indicates a PGP signed message. I also noticed that some messages have a green strip on the left of the message flag. Anyone know what that's for?

Re: Message Flag Icon

2003-10-26 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello Michael, On October 26, 2003, 13:56, you wrote: MR> I've noticed that the Message Flag icon has a few more designs than MR> before. Besides closed and open, there is a check mark that (I assume) MR> indicates a PGP signed message. MR> I also noticed that some messages have

Re: Message Flag Icon

2003-10-26 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Sunday, October 26, 2003, 19:56:29, Michael Rudnick wrote: > I've noticed that the Message Flag icon has a few more designs than > before. Besides closed and open, there is a check mark that (I assume) > indicates a PGP signed message. This has been around since 1.60 IIRC. &g

Re: Message Flag Icon

2003-10-26 Thread Vasiliy Efimenko
Hello Michael, On 26 October 2003, at 13:56:29 -0500 you wrote: MR> I also noticed that some messages have a green strip on the left of MR> the message flag. Anyone know what that's for? This means that message was replied. -- Best regards, Vasiliyma

Re[2]: Message Flag

2002-05-05 Thread 3w
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 4:43:34 PM, you wrote: JA> ... (and probably before) about TB! and S/MIME. Unfortunately I cannot JA> guide you much on the topic, as I personally haven't looked into it. I JA> use PGP for most of my work. I'm using PGP, too. And thanks to 2 members of this list I got an

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Jonathan Angliss
I'm guessing you're meaning the envelop is marked with a S/MIME signature. Not everybody on the list uses them, so I'm guessing only some of them appear with it on. There has been a long thread over the last couple of days (and probably before) about TB! and S/MIME. Unfortunately I cannot guide

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:47, 3w wrote: > How can I get version 1.60i? Do I have to subscribe on a sort of > beta-distribution list? The official version still is 1.60h. Join TBBETA, send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60i on Windows 2000 5.0 Bui

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Marcus Ohlström
Could not sent this message to the list because the word subs***be was "one of the first few lines". Maybe if I enter some empty lines here: On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:47, 3w wrote: > How can I get version 1.60i? Do I have to subscribe on a sort of > beta-distribution list? The officia

Re[2]: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread 3w
How can I get version 1.60i? Do I have to subscribe on a sort of beta-distribution list? The official version still is 1.60h. 3w Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:13:57 PM, you wrote: MO> On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 11:51, 3w wrote: >> Some of you send messages which are flagged in a special way - I >>

Re[2]: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread 3w
Thanks, that was fast! BTW, works perfect. ;-) cu, 3w Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:59:47 PM, you wrote: MO> On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:53, 3w wrote: >> How can I get version 1.60i? The official version is 1.60h. MO> http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/ __

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:53, 3w wrote: > How can I get version 1.60i? The official version is 1.60h. http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/ -- Regards, Marcus Ohlström Using The Bat! v1.60i on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 PGP Public Key at http://www.canit.se/~marcus/

Re[2]: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread 3w
How can I get version 1.60i? The official version is 1.60h. Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:13:57 PM, you wrote: MO> On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 11:51, 3w wrote: >> Some of you send messages which are flagged in a special way - I >> don't know how to explain it better than 'envelope with small circle

Re[2]: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread 3w
Thanks for the help, now I can read them. :-) Will try to follow the discussion more detailled so I don't miss those important subjects. greets, 3w Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:28:02 PM, you wrote: RO> Hello 3w, RO> On Sat, 4 May 2002 11:51:21 +0200GMT (4-5-02, 11:51 +0200GMT, where I RO> live),

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello 3w, On Sat, 4 May 2002 11:51:21 +0200GMT (4-5-02, 11:51 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: 3> Some of you send messages which are flagged in a special way - I 3> don't know how to explain it better than 'envelope with small 3> circle and kind of ok-sign in it'. I can't read the mail, it's

Re: Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread Marcus Ohlström
On Saturday, May 4, 2002, 11:51, 3w wrote: > Some of you send messages which are flagged in a special way - I > don't know how to explain it better than 'envelope with small circle > and kind of ok-sign in it'. I can't read the mail, it's not shown in > the preview window. Why? Because you are

Message Flag

2002-05-04 Thread 3w
Hi folks Some of you send messages which are flagged in a special way - I don't know how to explain it better than 'envelope with small circle and kind of ok-sign in it'. I can't read the mail, it's not shown in the preview window. Why? Fact is that I couldn't find anything in the help file, so