Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?)

2005-09-06 Thread Chris
Alexander S. Kunz @ 9/06/2005 3:35:37 PM "Mod: Cut mark (was: I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?)" > Interesting. My signature delimiter in Outlook never works. Maybe because I > send via Exchange server. Yes. There is a setting in the Exchange serve

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?)

2005-09-06 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else, on 06-Sep-2005 at 22:01 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote: > I'm sure no one who does tech here did any patching, and I have a working > delimiter in my signature block in Outlook 2003. I virtually never use > it, but just tested now because I was pretty sure it d

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?)

2005-09-06 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, September 6, 2005, 2:37:58 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: >> doesn't the have to be a space after the two dashes, and wasn't it >> missing? > Yes. Thats often the problem with mailers that are completely unaware of > the sig delimiter function. You cannot create a working sig delimiter

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?)

2005-09-06 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Dwight A Corrin & everyone else, on 06-Sep-2005 at 19:13 you (Dwight A Corrin) wrote: >>> -- >>> Wil >> hehe > doesn't the have to be a space after the two dashes, and wasn't it > missing? Yes. Thats often the problem with mailers that are completely unaware of the sig delimiter function

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?)

2005-09-06 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, September 6, 2005, 11:47:19 AM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > And adding a manual cutmark doesn't work either. ;-) >> -- >> Wil > hehe doesn't the have to be a space after the two dashes, and wasn't it missing? -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 3

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?)

2005-09-06 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Wil & everyone else, on 06-Sep-2005 at 12:10 you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Sorry all members. I've used my webmail to post quickly. I forget that there > is > no template with Webmail as with my TB ! ;-) And adding a manual cutmark doesn't work either. ;-) > -- > Wil hehe -- Best

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?)

2005-09-06 Thread wilwilwil
Selon Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. Sorry all members. I've used my webmail to post quickly. I forget that there is no template with Webmail as with my TB ! ;-) -- Wil Current version i

Mod: Cut mark (was: I believed that the 3.60 improved the answers on mail HTML?)

2005-09-06 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Wil, On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 09:37:14 +0200GMT (6-9-2005, 9:37 +0200, where I live), you wrote: W> I could already answer HTML mails before the version 3.51 and 3.60 and that goes W> very well ! I don't understand why TB has changed... W> W> C