Marck, Friday, April 30, 2004, 7:36:14 AM, you wrote:
MDP> Dear Richard, MDP> @30-Apr-2004, 06:57 +0500 (30-Apr 02:57 UK time) Richard H. Stoddard MDP> [RHS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Clive: RHS>> Looks like a TB! problem. RHS>> ________________________________________________ RHS>> Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: RHS>> http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html MDP> <moderator> MDP> Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not MDP> just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have MDP> instigated this reply. Please don't feel singled out Richard. I'm not sure what the problem was - this is what I show as sent: MDP> Clive, MDP> MDP> Thursday, April 29, 2004, 11:01:05 AM, you wrote: MDP> CT>> Are your addressees different at home and work? It might be coincidence CT>> that your 'home' recipients are simply ignoring the request for a CT>> receipt. MDP> MDP> I tested this by sending an e-mail to someone at work whose server MDP> always generates receipts confirmations. I get them at work, but not MDP> on the test messages I sent from home with TB! Looks like a TB! MDP> problem. I didn't have any signature at all on it. The part you quoted above shows the standard TBUDL tag, but no signature. As you can see, what I sent shows nothing. ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
