Re[3]: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-15 Thread Bill Blinn - Technology Editor
At 12:10 PM on 2/12/2004, Onno Broekmans typed ... O> Well, perhaps I'm just talking gibberish... Never mind then :) I've seen the space at the end of the cutline be eaten, too. It hasn't happened recently, but you're not imagining the problem. I've just never been able to reproduce it reliably.

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-12 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Onno, Thursday, February 12, 2004, 1:37:52 PM, you wrote: OB> Now *that*'s a terrific idea! Will do that shortly... It does not OB> only properly solve the cut mark problem, but also makes life a OB> bit easier ;-) Thanks a lot! Great! Looking forward to seeing proper cutlines from you soon

Re[2]: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-12 Thread Onno Broekmans
On Thursday, February 12, 2004 , Leif Gregory wrote: LG> What I did was create a text file that is actually my sig, then LG> used the %PUT macro. i.e. LG> %PUT="L:\Program Files\The Bat!\templates\TBsig.txt" Hi Leif, Now *that*'s a terrific idea! Will do that shortly... It does not only properl

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-12 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Onno, Thursday, February 12, 2004, 11:19:37 AM, you wrote: OB> Well, hereby a message with a cutmark-test to see if it works when OB> doing it manually from the message editor. If it does, then OB> perhaps I should try to fix my template... Btw, any idea if OB> setting a template for a paren

Re[2]: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-12 Thread Onno Broekmans
On Thursday, February 12, 2004 , Leif Gregory wrote: LG> Try doing it manually. Reply to this, delete your sig, and type: LG> -- LG> From Onno LG> It should work fine provided you do a "-- " enter. Hi Leif, Well, hereby a message with a cutmark-test to see if it works when doing it manually f

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-12 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Onno, Thursday, February 12, 2004, 10:10:02 AM, you wrote: OB> Well, perhaps I'm just talking gibberish... Never mind then :) OB> Regards, OB> -- OB> Onno Broekmans OB> |Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] OB> |Website:http://www.onnodb.com OB> Using The Bat! v2.02.3 CE on Windows XP

Re[2]: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-12 Thread Onno Broekmans
On Thursday, February 12, 2004 , Leif Gregory wrote: OB>> When entering a template's contents, TB seems to 'eat' the OB>> trailing space after the two dashes. The same seems to happen in OB>> the message editor. This seems to lead to bugs, like TB not OB>> properly removing signatures etc. LG> Hm

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-12 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Onno, Thursday, February 12, 2004, 9:08:18 AM, you wrote: OB> When entering a template's contents, TB seems to 'eat' the OB> trailing space after the two dashes. The same seems to happen in OB> the message editor. This seems to lead to bugs, like TB not OB> properly removing signatures etc.

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-12 Thread Leif Gregory
Hello Onno, Thursday, February 12, 2004, 9:08:18 AM, you wrote: OB> Well, there *was* a cut mark, was there? That reminds me of the OB> little problem I have with The Bat!, so I'm posting this reply OB> here. Not sure about it, just wondering if it's me or TB. OB> Regards, Please note, the belo

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-12 Thread Onno Broekmans
On Thursday, February 12, 2004 , Leif Gregory wrote: AJ>> -- AJ>> Cheers, AJ>> Allister LG> Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists LG> of a , i.e., a '-- ' by itself on a line. LG> This allows your readers, when replying, to quote your text without LG> the signatu

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: cut-line RFC and client support)

2004-02-03 Thread tb
--> Tuesday, February 3, 2004, 3:38:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> Malformed cut-line.. T>> I type it manually because I dislike automated signatures. > Not relevant, because it's the rules here that you have one. Search > the list archive if you want to know why we don't put the cut mark