-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Jonathan,
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, at 00:45:57 [GMT -0500]
(which was 26/10/2003 (D/M/Y) 6:45 where I live) you wrote:
JA I wish I could say it was my mail servers fault, unfortunately I
JA cannot, it's TB!. It's duplicating mail in my
Hello Jonathan,
I wish I could say it was my mail servers fault, unfortunately I
cannot, it's TB!. It's duplicating mail in my sent folder, and not
sending any mail, when I try forcing a send of my own, it sends the
duplicates. However I cannot remove the duplicates (manually, or by
using
Joan Josep, [JJ] wrote:
JJ This comes in very handy when we people are waiting to decide to
JJ upgrade to v2 or not.
I'm pretty much enjoying v2 here. I think Jonathan is using IMAP
accounts exclusively. The new IMAP support is still in the teething
stages and it would appear that its
Hello Jonathan,
...this is very much an out of the box IMAP install.
Ahhh! I forgot you were talking about IMAP. I don't use IMAP at all, so
I'm afraid I can't be of much help.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp OFF:
Hello Allie,
Sunday, October 26, 2003, 5:06:38 AM, you wrote:
JJ This comes in very handy when we people are waiting to decide to
JJ upgrade to v2 or not.
AM I'm pretty much enjoying v2 here. I think Jonathan is using IMAP
AM accounts exclusively. The new IMAP support is still in the
AM
Hello MAU,
Sunday, October 26, 2003, 3:53:31 AM, you wrote:
I wish I could say it was my mail servers fault, unfortunately I
cannot, it's TB!. It's duplicating mail in my sent folder, and not
sending any mail, when I try forcing a send of my own, it sends the
duplicates. However I cannot
Hello Jonathan Angliss,
on 2003-10-21, 07:41, you wrote (at least in part):
snip
JA Unfortunately I doubt it, if anything was attempted, they would
JA probably be able to get away on a technicality on what the software is
JA designed to do, and not what the software is being used to. After all,
Unfortunately I doubt it, if anything was attempted, they would
probably be able to get away on a technicality on what the software is
designed to do, and not what the software is being used to.
You were talking about De'ja Vu?
Saw this one coming along about a half hour ago, with the same
Hi Peter,
@26-Oct-2003, 01:19 +0200 (00:19 UK time) Peter Ouwehand [PO] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Jonathan:
PO ... Mailing-list problems maybe?
Nope. A quick check of the headers shows that the mailing list was
resent it from Jonathan's outbound mail server.
--
Cheers -- .\\arck D
On Saturday, October 25, 2003, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
PO ... Mailing-list problems maybe?
Nope. A quick check of the headers shows that the mailing list was
resent it from Jonathan's outbound mail server.
I wish I could say it was my mail servers fault, unfortunately I
cannot, it's TB!.
So I'm reluctant to use TB at the moment :/
And on that email being duplicated, I'm switching to the webmail client I
write... At least this way I know that my mail is being sent, it is being
copied to my sent folder, and it's not being duplicated... now to write a
PGP feature into it :/
--
On Monday, October 20, 2003, 23:18:22, Jim D wrote:
And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.
Doesn't help too much, though:
My Spamassasssin says:
* 1.2 PRIORITY_NO_NAME Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer
even though the message in question was sent with normal
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:35:04 -0700, Melissa Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It's really unfortunate that this had to be fixed by those not at
all at fault here.
That sure is - as usual, the good suffer for the bad.
Is there anything we can do to help shutdown the
original spammer/software that
Hi The_Bat! Users,
Tuesday, October 21, 2003, 3:37:10 AM, you wrote:
RK My Spamassasssin says:
RK * 1.2 PRIORITY_NO_NAME Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer
RK even though the message in question was sent with normal priority.
Is this saying that it needs the X-Mailer header in order
On Monday, October 20, 2003, Melissa Reese wrote...
I just installed v2.01.3, and now there is an option under
Options/Preferences/General to enable the X-Mailer header. The
default now is to have the header disabled.
It's really unfortunate that this had to be fixed by those not at
all at
Hello TBUDL,
-[Begin Quote]
-[Source - Ritlabs]
Click Here ---) http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php
-[End Quote]
--
Regards,
Simon Fincham
Using The Bat: Version 2.01 on Windows XP Pro SP1 Build 2600
SPAM Detection:BayesIt! 0.4gm
On 10/20/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Simon
Fincham said:
Click Here ---)
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php
And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.
--
Best regards,
Jim D JD -at- CastleGK -dot- com
[Using The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows XP
Hello Jim,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 2:18:22 PM, you wrote:
JD On 10/20/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Simon
JD Fincham said:
Click Here ---)
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/download.php
JD And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.
Where is it?
--
Best regards,
Hello Steve,
Monday, October 20, 2003, 5:02:05 PM, Steve Thomas wrote:
JD And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.
Steve Thomas Where is it?
Options - preferences - general
last checkbox
--
Best regards,
Lourdes
The Bat! 2.01.3 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1
Hi Steve,
on 20/10/03 you wrote:
ST Where is it?
I installed the new version but for some reason the old the_bat.exe
was left in the folder.
I manually extracted the new exe and replaced in the program file and
v2.01.3 now works fine
--
David Boggon
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
More than 3.5
On 10/20/2003, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve
Thomas said:
JD And this has the aforementioned X-Mailer on/off toggle.
Where is it?
Options | Preferences
It's the last checkbox. It was unchecked already on mine (meaning it's
_not_ sending X-Mailer header by default).
--
Best regards,
Jim D
21 matches
Mail list logo
