Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, January 23, 2001, Thomas wrote to OK3 on TBUDL about
Newbie: Sorting office and batch:
T>>> I don't know anything about BBS;
>> I can't see the reason.
I meant why mastering of BBS is the reason for not using TB!&#
Hallo Oleg,
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:45:28 +0400 GMT (23/01/2001, 16:45 +0800 GMT),
OK3 wrote:
T>> I don't know anything about BBS;
> I can't see the reason.
That's because I never learned anything about BBS, and never used it
either.
T>> but if TB sends the mails, it will
T>> move them to the S
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Tuesday, January 23, 2001, Thomas wrote to Alain de Gevigney on TBUDL about
Newbie: Sorting office and batch:
>> My problem is that I lose everything I send except if I copy it in
>> every 'sent' folder before running the batch.
>&g
Hallo Alain,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001 10:47:03 +0100 GMT (22/01/2001, 17:47 +0800 GMT),
Alain de Gevigney wrote:
> So, when I've some outbound waiting mail, I run a batch to export it
> in Unix format (one directory by account).
> My problem is that I lose everything I send except if I copy it in
>
Hello ,
(one more try: last one was loose in a thread ?...)
So, this is my 2nd post ;)
I'm using The Bat since a couple of month to read/write my emails but
nearly never to send or receive it - the main reason is that I'm
running a BBS.
So, when I've some outbound waiting mail, I run a batch to
Hello ,
this is my first post, I'm using The Bat since a couple of month to
read/write my emails but nearly never to send or receive it - the main
reason is that I'm running a BBS.
So, when I've some outbound waiting mail, I run a batch to export it
in Unix format (one directory by account).
My
6 matches
Mail list logo
