Re[2]: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread Chema Berian
Hello Listers, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, at 18:05:54 [GMT -0400] (which was 0:05 where I live) azrael wrote: a TBUDLreplytemp aShould TBUDLreplytemp be showing? It does at my end. No, it shouldn't. Yes it does :D I think you have the literal string in the template. Just delete it. --

Re[2]: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread Chema Berian
Hello Listers, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, at 19:31:01 [GMT -0400] (which was next day at 1:31 where I live) azrael wrote: a This is what shows in the template. Delete which please? a On %ODATE, at a %OTIMELONG, %OFROMNAME wrote: a %WRAPPED="%QUOTES" a %CURSOR a %SINGLERE Sorry if I

Re[2]: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread Chema Berian
Hello Listers, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, at 19:58:37 [GMT -0400] (which was next day at 1:58 where I live) azrael wrote: aI deleted it and hope it remains gone. It seems to me that is has gone. Did u change the template around 18:00 PM (your time)? Last message before that time has the

Re[2]: Digest (04/20/2001 10:40) Special Issue (#2001-998)

2001-04-20 Thread Chema Berian
Hello Listers, On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, at 19:13:13 [GMT -0500] (which was next day at 2:13 where I live) Allie wrote: ACM I was referring to the Re:[] numbering and not 'TBUDLreplytemp' showing. Well, they are both gone :D -- Chema Berian mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP keys available: