Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

2003-09-07 Thread Brian S. Schang
Hello: It's my understanding (maybe erroneously) that not all implementations of IMAP allow for folder to contain messages themselves?? I'm using the University of Washington version that ships with Red Hat 7.2. JA That's not an erroneous statement at all. In fact, a very valid JA statement.

Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

2003-09-05 Thread Stefan Tanurkov
Hello Jonathan, Friday, September 5, 2003, 1:35:05 AM, you wrote: JA I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before JA checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of what is JA selectable and what isn't on first login. Please add it to the BT so it's not forgotten

Re: Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

2003-09-05 Thread Brian S. Schang
Hello: JA I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before JA checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of what is JA selectable and what isn't on first login. Please add it to the BT so it's not forgotten :-) The \NoSelect flag can be detected, but it is not

Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

2003-09-05 Thread Antje Lehmann
Hi, Brian S. Schang wrote: Clive, Inbox Inbox.subs Inbox.subs.TBUDL Inbox.xxx Inbox.xxx.yyy So do Inbox.subs and Inbox.xxx contain messages, or are they just entities to hold TBUDL and yyy respectively? I have a similar structure and in my case they could contain messages, because

Re[2]: IMAP and subfolders

2003-09-04 Thread Edward J. Shornock
On Thursday, September 04, 2003, Clive Taylor wrote: CT Yup. Keep complaining. IMAP doesn't work well in this version - CT a big disappointment. I concur with that. The IMAP support is *better* than in v1.x by far, but it still needs more work. It's kinda sad that Outlook Express has very