Hello:
It's my understanding (maybe erroneously) that not all
implementations of IMAP allow for folder to contain messages
themselves?? I'm using the University of Washington version that
ships with Red Hat 7.2.
JA That's not an erroneous statement at all. In fact, a very valid
JA statement.
Hello Jonathan,
Friday, September 5, 2003, 1:35:05 AM, you wrote:
JA I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before
JA checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of what is
JA selectable and what isn't on first login.
Please add it to the BT so it's not forgotten
Hello:
JA I'd have thought you would be doing a check for \NoSelect before
JA checking the status of a folder. Or even building a view of
what is
JA selectable and what isn't on first login.
Please add it to the BT so it's not forgotten :-) The \NoSelect
flag can be detected, but it is not
Hi,
Brian S. Schang wrote:
Clive,
Inbox
Inbox.subs
Inbox.subs.TBUDL
Inbox.xxx
Inbox.xxx.yyy
So do Inbox.subs and Inbox.xxx contain messages, or are they just
entities to hold TBUDL and yyy respectively?
I have a similar structure and in my case they could contain messages,
because
On Thursday, September 04, 2003, Clive Taylor wrote:
CT Yup. Keep complaining. IMAP doesn't work well in this version -
CT a big disappointment.
I concur with that. The IMAP support is *better* than in v1.x by far,
but it still needs more work.
It's kinda sad that Outlook Express has very
5 matches
Mail list logo