Re[2]: Inbox 'dangers'

Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 9:59:39 PM, you wrote: TF> Hello Paul, TF> On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:14:19 +1000 GMT (06/03/2007, 11:14 +0700 GMT), TF> Paul Berger wrote: ASK>>> But wouldn't that also move messages that are BCC'ed to you to trash? PB>> Thank you for querying this,

Re[2]: Inbox 'dangers'

Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tuesday, March 6, 2007, 4:38:26 AM, you wrote: ASK> Hello Paul Berger & everyone else, ASK> on Monday, March 5, 2007 at 06:04 you (Paul Berger) wrote: >> One other filter that helps to keep out spam: >> Recipient does not match or any >> additional addresses you u

Re[2]: Inbox 'dangers'

Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Monday, March 5, 2007, 7:59:24 AM, you wrote: ASK> Hello Jack S. LaRosa & everyone else, ASK> on Sunday, March 4, 2007 at 22:47 you (Jack S. LaRosa) wrote: >> I find it 'inelegant' to have this faux inbox as it's yet another >> folder displayed in the account tree. ASK