Re[2]: OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)

2000-08-10 Thread Jamie Dainton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Johannes, Wednesday, August 09, 2000, 20:09:41, you wrote: JMP I was talking with my own experience in mind, which is the JMP 100% digital phone network in Europe. As you can get ISDN in every JMP (!!) lost corner around here, thus having

Re[2]: OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)

2000-08-08 Thread Jamie Dainton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas, Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 08:55:47, you wrote: TF Especially, please do not blow your postings up to over 7K just TF because of this S/Mime. Some people pay internet charges per TF download time; this list is meant to assist people

Re[2]: OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)

2000-08-08 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 09:51:38, you wrote: TF Also, it's not one message that may take longer. Take a list of 100 TF postings per day, and imagine each posting comes 4 or 5K extra. I actually made that point clear in my post and it has been snipped to falsify my opinion and

Re[2]: OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)

2000-08-08 Thread Deryk Lister
Hi Thomas, On Tuesday 08/08/2000 at 10:39, you wrote: I own up. This is Jamie Dainton pretending to be Thomas. At first glance this e-mail should look like it came from him. Who really checks the headers? Same people who bother to check the signatures ;) Basically what TB needs is

Re[2]: OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)

2000-08-08 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 10:48:05, you wrote: TF Your opinion is that it doesn't matter to you. It does matter to me. TF Please do not send S/Mime signatures. In this relase version which I TF am using here in the office, and for which this list is anyway, your TF certificate

Re[2]: OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)

2000-08-08 Thread Jamie Dainton
Hello Thomas, Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 11:16:36, you wrote: JMP There is a S/MIME 1.45 release... TF You'll find it on the beta page ;-) It hasn't got a beta suffix though. -- Jamie Dainton Tuesday, August 08, 2000 11:31:32 The Bat! 1.46 Beta/3 Windows 98 4.10 mailto:[EMAIL

Re[2]: OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)

2000-08-08 Thread Jamie Dainton
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas, Tuesday, August 08, 2000, 11:43:24, you wrote: TF Hi Jamie, TF On Tue, 8 Aug 2000 11:19:37 +0100GMT (08/08/2000, 18:19 +0800GMT), TF Jamie Dainton wrote: TF Hear, hear. I want to know what others say to this: Is this mailing TF

Re[2]: OT? S/MIME PGP (inspired by: Re[2]: List server rules)

2000-08-08 Thread Wolfgang Kynast
Hi Thomas, ... JD I do not think it is necessary to decrease our security to JD accommodate the minority of users who have a very low bandwidth JD connection. TF Hear, hear. I want to know what others say to this: Is this mailing TF list only for high-bandwidth privileged users? Clearly NO. I