Re[2]: Scheduler - reasons to go V2

2003-09-11 Thread Vishal
Hi Allie Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 8:30:23 PM, you wrote: AM If you have your own domain, you can accurately tell, based on the AM In-Reply-To header which messages are direct replies to yours. Useful. I remember a thread in which this was discussed earlier. I'll keep it in mind for when I

Re[2]: Scheduler - reasons to go V2

2003-09-09 Thread Vishal
Hi Steve Saturday, September 6, 2003, 12:29:23 PM, you wrote: SMK I'm beginning to feel that the standard 30-day trial SMK period just isn't enough, and that maybe users should push for 60 to 90 days. For TB? How about one year? It might be enough :) Cheers, -Vishal

Re[2]: Scheduler - reasons to go V2

2003-09-06 Thread Gnter Minnerup
On Sunday, September 7, 2003, 2:00:46 AM, Anne wrote: How about this one? It's not exactly concise but it's pretty comprehensive and is worth a look through! It's taken from the Readme.txt file which is included with v2.0 on installation: It's mainly a list of bug fixes from the beta

Re[2]: Scheduler - reasons to go V2

2003-09-06 Thread Bill Blinn Technology Editor
At 2:48 PM on 9/6/2003, Paul Richardson typed ... P I sympathise. I too am a refugee from another program, and haven't even P been using TB as long as you. Powerful it may be, but what's the use P if a substantial part of that power is undocumented. It's pretty P shabby, IMO. Without the kind

Re[2]: Scheduler - reasons to go V2

2003-09-05 Thread Gnter Minnerup
On Saturday, September 6, 2003, 9:54:29 AM, Jack Morrison wrote: But having the scheduler a part of TB finally allowed me to remove Outlook 2002 from my system. The only reason it was still there was because I still used its Calendar, To-Do, etc. functions. Is that what it does? I wish there