Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 3:45:06 PM, you wrote:
RA On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 at 15:27:28 +1000, Paul wrote:
When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles
endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager.
RA I don't experience a problem. What do
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 3:45:06 PM, you wrote:
RA On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 at 15:27:28 +1000, Paul wrote:
When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles
endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager.
RA I don't experience a problem. What do
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 7:14:04 PM, you wrote:
ASK Hello Paul Berger everyone else,
ASK on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 11:04 you (Paul Berger) wrote:
So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27
conditions in it.
ASK You could copy
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 7:17:58 PM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Alexander,
RO On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:14:04 +0100GMT (18-1-2007, 10:14 , where I
RO live), you wrote:
So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27
conditions in it.
ASK You could copy
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 7:17:58 PM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Alexander,
RO On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:14:04 +0100GMT (18-1-2007, 10:14 , where I
RO live), you wrote:
So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27
conditions in it.
ASK You could copy
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 11:31:12 PM, you wrote:
PM Hi Paul,
PM on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000GMT (18.01.2007, 11:04 +0100GMT here),
PM you wrote:
When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles
endlessly, and have to close the bat from task
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Friday, January 19, 2007, 12:26:21 AM, you wrote:
TF Hello Paul,
TF On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000 GMT (18/01/2007, 17:04 +0700 GMT),
TF Paul Berger wrote:
PB The problem seems to be in only one of the filters. If I try to
PB another condition, the list fades on
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thursday, January 18, 2007, 8:27:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK Hello Paul Berger everyone else,
ASK on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 11:30 you (Paul Berger) wrote:
So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27
conditions in it.
ASK You could copy
Miguel,
Can anyone tell me how to move all my filters to common so that I
can then share them with the relevant accounts?
The only way I know so far is Copy (Cut) Paste .
Is there a way to copy and paste multiple filters? Or do I have to do
them one at a time, which will be very painful.
On Friday, November 14, 2003 at 1:00 PM, Simon wrote:
Does anyone know about this feature? Is it not supposed to do what I
am attempting to do with it? All I want to do is export the messages
to .msg files as they are filtered into their TB! folder. I would have
thought that this would
Hello Jonathan list,
On or about Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 13:18:05GMT -0600
(which was 2:18 PM in the tropics where I live) Jonathan Angliss
murmured:
Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow?
JA If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the
JA order in which
Hello Jonathan,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 3:18:05 PM, you wrote:
On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Adam wrote...
Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow?
If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the order
in which they are applied. That could have a
Hello,
Wednesday, January 15, 2003, 4:17:23 PM, you wrote:
If the sort is only applied to the viewing of the list of filters, I
wouldn't mind.
But how do you sort on displayed, and not alter the order of affect?
You'd then have to tag each filter with an order number, and have that
Hi Thomas,
If you could sort them, perhaps hierachically, or hiding some
elements, you could have a better overview of the Rule set that you
created, and easier to maintain, and update. I'm referring to their
user display, not internal rule list.
TF Oh please, no. The order of the display
Hi St,
Now that I can see what you had in mind - I like it!
Actually, I'd prefer a plain external text file
with the rules in execution order.
(Makes sharing of rules very easy to do.)
TB reads the text file and presents the default view
which would be execution order. It'd have a couple
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
On or about Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 05:38:13GMT +0100
(which was 11:38 PM in the tropics where I live) St - Musaic.Net
opined:
SMN I am not against today's order of display, either (rules sorted
SMN in the order they are processed) - BUT it would certainly be
Sunday, August 11, 2002, 3:38:36 PM, you wrote:
Come on Thomas, you have to be a bit more open minded.
He's not asking to make it bigger, just re-sizeable.
You could keep it as small as you wanted for yourself.
DAC It is not the size which I find lacking, but the lack
DAC of ability to
Hello Allie,
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, at 05:17:57 [GMT -0500] (which was 11:17 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
While we are on the subject of resizing, this is related, but in the
Losest terms. (!) Why is it that windows with two or more scroll
windows all move when you use a scroll button on the
Hello Allie,
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, at 16:00:21 [GMT -0500] (which was 22:00 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
ACM In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
ACM Michael Thompson [MT] wrote:'
MT While we are on the subject of resizing, this is related, but in
MT the Losest terms. (!) Why is it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, May 02, 2001, 11:37:55 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
If i understand you right, you want to colour code your messages based
upon the sender (or whatever). For that you first define the colour
groups you need, then create filters in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, May 02, 2001, 11:58:13 AM, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
Assuming that you are creating a filter under the 'incoming'
folder rather than the 'read' folder, then how about the
following:
Inbox is the source folder listed in my filter.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, May 02, 2001, 12:45:57 PM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
On the whole Jan made the process much more efficient; where I used
two filters for any filtering criterion he used one. Should have
thought of it myself.
No problem, at least you're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
On Wednesday, May 02, 2001 19:37:05 [ +0100 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'Sorting Office/Filters':
Marck In that case the problem is in the colour group definition in that
Marck there are *two* colour settings - one normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, May 02, 2001, 1:37:05 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Hi Frederick,
In that case the problem is in the colour group definition in that
there are *two* colour settings - one normal (the surface definition)
and one for unread (the
24 matches
Mail list logo
