Re: Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-16 Thread sacksa
I would like to thank Thomas Fernandez and everyone else who wrote in regarding the virus warning I received upon downloading mail. (For those who are keeping track, I posted the problem from my other e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).) Because my eTrust AV program works so well, it caught

Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread Tony
Hello All, a eTrust EZ Antivirus real-time protection has found that a C:\DOCUME~1\AVRAM\LOCALS~1\Temp\bat653.tmp is HTML.ObjectDataHTA a dropper . a However, I continue to get warning messages each time I download a e-mail. The message is always the same, except that the number a changes.

Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread achdut
Hello Thomas, Sunday, June 13, 2004, 12:35:20 AM, you wrote: I wrote: On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 23:48:46 a eTrust EZ Antivirus real-time protection has found that a C:\DOCUME~1\AVRAM\LOCALS~1\Temp\bat653.tmp is HTML.ObjectDataHTA a dropper [snip] a However, I continue to get warning messages each

Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread achdut
Hello Thomas, Sunday, June 13, 2004, 2:11:14 AM, you wrote: a And, just exactly, what IS TB's mail despatcher (dispatcher?) TF It's a utility with which you can manage mails on the (POP) server: TF Account / Despatch Mail on Server / All messages. a It would appear that these files are in

Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread Tony
Hello Thomas, . T At that time the other part of your AV should kick in. TF The AV should kick in when I ask it. That's how I have set it: It I do TF want to open an attachment, I ask the doctor (PC-Cillin): Does this TF file contain a virus? I *will* forget to ask the doctor for sure :(

Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread Tony
Hello Melissa, MR Hi William, MR On Sunday, June 13, 2004, at 12:52:08 AM PST, you wrote: I don't have this problem using NOD32 independently. It flags an incoming virus-laden message, I delete it, end of story. MR I've been using NOD32 for a few years now (since v1.x), and I really MR like

Re[2]: Virus warning upon execution of mail download

2004-06-13 Thread Tony
Hello Thomas, TF The AV should kick in when I ask it. That's how I have set it: It I do TF want to open an attachment, I ask the doctor (PC-Cillin): Does this TF file contain a virus? T I *will* forget to ask the doctor for sure :( T That's why I have set everything to automatic. TF Then don't

Re[2]: Virus Scan msg on mail check - Exploit-MIME.gen.exe

2003-06-10 Thread Maurice McAdam
Hello Marck, On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 10:38:55 +0100 GMT (10.06.2003, 11:38 +0200 GMT, where I live), you wrote: Snip MDP 3) Get shot of McAffee and instead use an AV solution MDP that has a TB plug in and won't interfere with normal MDP operation. NOD32 is generally acknowledged as the best MDP

Re[2]: Virus Scan msg on mail check - Exploit-MIME.gen.exe

2003-06-10 Thread Daniel Rail
Hello David, Tuesday, June 10, 2003, 2:26:49 PM, you wrote: DB 6.02.3000.1 DB Thanks for the info. I've found the message on my server and deleted DB it. DB Won't excluding the bat*.temp files within McAffee cause an infection DB if I do receive dodgy mail? I actually use the HAWK feature of

Re[2]: Virus checking on outgoing mail

2003-01-27 Thread Mark Wieder
Basically what Allie said here. Not that I can resist adding my own two cents... IMNSHO scanning outgoing email is a useless function. Here's the reasoning: 1. If your virus scanner is doing its job (and you have it enabled to check incoming emails as well as doing realtime checking when you

Re[2]: Virus Plugins

2003-01-17 Thread Olivier Dutertre
Hello 3w, Does anyone on this forum heard about compatibility issue between the bat 1.61 and Kaspersky AV plugin ? I made a deinstall-reinstall procedure and the problem still remains. Any comment ? Le Thursday, January 16, 2003, à 7:53:40 AM, vous avez écrit: 3 Wednesday, January 15, 2003,

Re[2]: Virus Plugins

2003-01-15 Thread Timothy Casten
I have tried NAV 2002 and 2003 and have a problem with timeouts due to its e-mail scanning. The problem is that I maintain both of NATCAS big Internet servers. One we use as a e-mail server running mailsite and the other as a web server. We use sieve filters for virus protection in the e-mail

Re[2]: Virus filtering

2002-06-12 Thread Daniel van Rooijen [CopyCats]
ACM However, TB! will search only the headers and text body for ACM matching strings. Yes, but Allie, those infected attachments are referenced in the header by the strings that Mitja defined. It's for those references that Mitja was setting up a filter. Looking at the source of some infected

Re[2]: Virus filtering

2002-06-12 Thread Daniel van Rooijen [CopyCats]
Hi Allie, ACM on examination of the source, if I look *after* the message body ACM where TB! doesn't search, Now I see! I'm still used to a different representation of internet headers (from using Compuserve for years, where they are translated and put below the message body, along with any

Re[2]: Virus

2001-12-03 Thread Raj
Syafril, On Mon, 3 Dec 2001, at 19:16:07 [GMT +0700] (which was 5:46 PM where I live) you wrote: SH AFAIK AVP from Kaspersky Labs can detect viruses even we set SH attachment inline message body (not in separate directory/folder). My SH Av on Mail Server also using Kaspersky Labs AV

Re[2]: Virus

2001-12-02 Thread Kevin Conlin
Sunday, December 02, 2001, Kenneth S. Rhee In Regards to Virus KSR Hello Kevin, KSR 2 Dec 2001, 2:40:33 PM, you wrote: KSR What virus? I don't think I have received such e-mail lately. The Virus is the W32.Badtrans Virus, Quite a Dangerous one which goes through the address book

Re[2]: Virus

2001-12-02 Thread Eric Malausséna
Hi Jan, On dimanche 2 décembre 2001 at 23:34:24, you wrote : Eric I confirm. With AVP, the message couldn't be Eric downloaded and I had to delete it on the server. Eric It is I.Worm.BadrtransII as registered by AVP. JR Does this mean that AVP automatically prevented the JR message from

Re[2]: Virus On Mail Check

2001-12-01 Thread -=Too.!=-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Que tal Marcel, ...and erase your windows\temp directoy - -- |\ /^~~^\ /| -qqQ-\O||O/-Qpp---=Siguiendo el tema=--- \oo/ ~~ El Viernes 30 de Noviembre de 2001 a las 22:40:53 GMT (osease, a las 3:40 PM en mi

Re[2]: Virus

2001-09-05 Thread Raj
Nick, On Wed, 05 Sep 2001, at 17:20:55 [GMT -0700] (which was 5:50 AM where I live) you wrote: looks like an error in CAI's virus-signature file ... NA Why are you so sure it's in error? Perhaps you really *are* infected. I NA would run another Anti-Virus Program... sort of second opinion if

Re[2]: Virus checking turning OFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

2000-06-08 Thread Alexander A. Gomanyuk
Hello Thomas and Batmans, THANK UU, my savior ! Hi Alexander, On 8 Jun 2000 14:33:08 +0500GMT (08/06/2000, 17:33 +0800GMT), Alexander A. Gomanyuk wrote: AAG I can't endure it anymore ! Please tell me where i can turn off AAG question box concerning viruses in attaches ?! In the

Re[2]: Virus checking turning OFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF

2000-06-08 Thread Alexander A. Gomanyuk
Hello Patrick and Batmans, AAG I can't endure it anymore ! Please tell me where i can turn off AAG question box concerning viruses in attaches ?! AAG Regards, Your sincerely registered AAG 3AHO3A [EMAIL PROTECTED]|2:5012/18.2 ^^^