Monday, June 21, 2004, 11:26:39 AM, Andre wrote:
> On 21 Jun 2004 at 21:03:10 -0600 GMT [05:03 CEST] you wrote:
WK>> Will AVG work without the plugin? I only use pop3 and am happy
WK>> to have infected messages/attachments just deleted.
> What's so terrible wrong with doing exactly that with a p
T>> What use is an Anti Virus (AV) plug-in?
T>> I think all decent AV tools sniff incoming/outgoing e-mail traffic
T>> automatically.
T>> So what benefit does a plug-in add?
> It quarantines bad mails into a quarantine folder within TB, while a
> AV program without plugin will quarantine it ot a f
Hello Joseph,
JN> On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 20:51:57 GMT, Allie Martin wrote:
>> You may also be using POP3 but with encryption. Again, the usual
>> POP3 scanners will not detect viruses over an ecrypted feed. The
>> plugin helps there.
JN> Allie, wouldn't the AMON filter detect the virus when it hit
Hello William,
WM> Hello Simon
WM> Thank you for your email dated Saturday, June 12, 2004, 9:26:48 PM,
WM> in which you wrote:
>> NOD32 can only deal with POP3 or MAPI through it's IMON / EMON
>> scanners.
WM> Since IMON is email client independent and works at the winsock level
WM> doesn't it
Hello Michael,
MLW> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MLW> Hash: SHA1
MLW> Hello Tony,
MLW> On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, at 21:46:36 [GMT+0200] (which was 12:46:36 In San
MLW> Jose, CA, USA) you wrote:
T>> I'm currently using NOD32; and I think there is a plugin for it.
I meant to say *no* plugin
5 matches
Mail list logo
