Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-27 Thread Susanne
Hi Ming-Li, Wednesday, September 27, 2000, 10:33:49 AM, you wrote: > Looks like you're not very familiar with how filters in TB work. > There's an excellent tutorial on the FAQ, as others have mentioned. Not familiar at all, but I've looked through the tutorial and seem to have things under c

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-26 Thread Susanne
Hi Marck, Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 4:46:51 PM, you wrote: > You do know of the FAQ at www.silverstones.com/thebat.FAQ.html, don't > you? There's quite a bit of info there. Yes, I visit there a lot, but sometimes it just doesn't have the answers. > While it could be, it isn't the standard

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-26 Thread Susanne
Hi Marck, Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 2:25:39 PM, you wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Indeed it was not. "Alternatives" means "OR". S>> I overlooked the 'add' button under the filtering strings. > "Additional" means "AND". S>> Some day I'll have all this figured out. > Does t

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-26 Thread Susanne
Hi Ming-Li, Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 5:29:47 AM, you wrote: > So you mean you set your filter up like this: > String Location Presence > (SA)DuesSubject Yes > RE: Subject No Success! I finally worked it out. Putting it under Alternatives wasn't the right way

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-26 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Marck, In your email stamped Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 11:19 AM re: changing source folder (for filtering) you wrote: Marck>>> Here's one that we came up with a while back that may interest Marck>>> you and handles list cross-posts. Filter all list traffic on Marck>>

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-26 Thread Susanne
Hi Ming-Li, Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 5:29:47 AM, you wrote: > So you mean you set your filter up like this: > String Location Presence > (SA)DuesSubject Yes > RE: Subject No Yes, I did and tries it several times again today. > and it doesn't work, right? No

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-26 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Marck, Included in your email stamped Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 15:24 re: changing source folder (for filtering) you wrote: Marck> A "kludge" as TB calls it is an RFC822 header. These are Marck> the lines of data that precede the message text which allow Ma

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-26 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Marck, Included in your email stamped Monday, September 25, 2000, 8:27 PM re: changing source folder (for filtering) you wrote: Marck> Here's one that we came up with a while back that may Marck> interest you and handles list cross-posts. Filter all list Marck

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-26 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello Marck, Included in your email stamped Tuesday, September 26, 2000, 5:51 AM re: changing source folder (for filtering) you wrote: Marck> [...] The *only* way to filter lists properly is Marck> using "Reply-To: TBUDL" (or whichever list it is) from Kludges. -|| End Original Ms

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-25 Thread Susanne
Hi Marck, Monday, September 25, 2000, 11:15:11 AM, you wrote: > I have, on occasion, had filters just turn out to be complete > failures. What I do when this happens is to throw away the filter that > doesn't work as expected and just start over. It's always easier > second time

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-25 Thread Susanne
Hi Ming-Li, Monday, September 25, 2000, 11:20:34 AM, you wrote: > Well, then something is not right in that particular filter. I think I found out, what was keeping the filter from working. It's one for a folder with mailing list posts. In the subject line every post automatically has (SA) add

Re[2]: changing source folder (for filtering)

2000-09-25 Thread Susanne
Hi Ming-Li, Monday, September 25, 2000, 4:02:42 AM, you wrote: > The most possible cause for your new filter to fail, I would guess, > is some other filter(s) preempts it. (You do know TB applies filters > in the order they appear in the Sorting Office, don't you?) So I > would suggest you move t