Re[2]: how to efficiently fight against spam with the bat!

Hello Allie, Tuesday, November 12, 2002, 11:03:19 AM, you wrote, and I heavily snipped as we can talk about this till the cows come home : ACM> In , ACM> Barry2 [B] wrote:' B>> The difference is that the rubbish isn't sent to me at all - I B>> consider

Re[2]: how to efficiently fight against spam with the bat!

Hello Allie, Sunday, November 10, 2002, 5:40:56 PM, you wrote: ACM> In , ACM> Barry2 [B] wrote:' B>> I.E. Watch what you are downloading ( using the inbuilt Mail B>> Dispatcher in TB! is for me an essential part of e-mail security B>> ) and apply a li

Re[2]: how to efficiently fight against spam with the bat!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Monday, November 11, 2002 9:13:43 PM RE: "how to efficiently fight against spam with the bat!" Greetings Simon, On Sunday, November 10, 2002, 7:28:37 AM, you wrote: S> I use a program called Mailwasher. It sits between my mailserver and TB! OT S> h

Re[2]: how to efficiently fight against spam with the bat!

John, JDH> Others swear by their favorite programs, however, and that's fine. As I said...not trying to offend. Just offering my 2 cents worth. ;) It's what works best for me and possibly some others here. -- Scott Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 ___

Re[2]: how to efficiently fight against spam with the bat!

To all reading this thread, ACM> Why not do the following. ACM> Filter all known mail to specific folders. ACM> Filter all unknown mail to a spam folder. This will comprise a ACM> single filter that goes below all the others. It is to move all ACM> messages to the spam folder. Switch the sound o

Re[2]: how to efficiently fight against spam with the bat!

Adam Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Sunday, November 10, 2002, 7:32:08 AM > Sunday, November 10, 2002, 2:25:35 AM, Mitch wrote: >> It's not just for filtering spam - you can filter your e-mail on >> ANYTHING. I've been playing with it a couple of hours, and I've got it >> set up to take over

Re[2]: how to efficiently fight against spam with the bat!

Adam Bradley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Saturday, November 9, 2002, 6:01:24 PM > Saturday, November 9, 2002, 8:52:35 PM, rick wrote: >> after 2 days it is working quite well. It uses probability instead of >> static filters. Works wonderful so far. > Are you just using it to filter spam? I was

Re[2]: how to efficiently fight against spam with the bat!

Hello Adam, Saturday, November 9, 2002, 9:01:24 PM, you wrote: AB> Saturday, November 9, 2002, 8:52:35 PM, rick wrote: >> after 2 days it is working quite well. It uses probability instead of >> static filters. Works wonderful so far. AB> Are you just using it to filter spam? I was interested i

Re[2]: how to efficiently fight against spam with the bat!

rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Saturday, November 9, 2002, 12:52:35 PM > Hello Claude, > Saturday, November 9, 2002, 3:10:06 PM, you wrote: CR>> Hi, CR>> Could someone tell me what antispam software (or CR>> solution) which workvery well with the bat!, a solution to fight against C