On Sunday, June 23, 2002, Jonathan Angliss wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hope this gives you a hint as in how the system works.
You mean how the system *should* work. It works like that for your
mail and mine, and for the legitimate commercial mail we receive. But
it
Hi Joseph,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 13:05:49 -0500, you wrote:
You mean how the system *should* work. It works like that for your
mail and mine, and for the legitimate commercial mail we receive. But
it doesn't work like that for most UBE that comes from fly-by-night
senders. Sometimes the
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 10:50:29 AM, you wrote:
JA Hi Lynn,
JA On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 10:27:26 -0700, you wrote:
I gather that only someone with SpamCop's resources has
any chance of figuring out where the thing really came
from ..?
JA Depends on how easy you find it to type a command, or
JA
Sunday, June 23, 2002, 8:42:50 PM, you wrote:
TF Hello Lynn,
TF On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:39:20 -0700 GMT (24/06/02, 10:39 +0700 GMT),
TF Lynn Turriff wrote:
LT I thought the last routing (closest to the body of the
LT mail) was the originator ... no?
TF Yes. But some spammers put fill in some
Hi Lynn,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 20:39:20 -0700, you wrote:
[snip]
I have no problem with the command line, but it's not
clear to me how this helps with a header that contains
only my mail address in the header, in both the 'from' and
'to' positions .. or will it extract the *actual* sender's
Hi Lynn,
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002 21:00:08 -0700, you wrote:
Thanks ..
Is there any way, apart from intuitive deduction, to
identify which information is forged, and which genuine?
Take a quick look at the headers... some (helpful) mail servers put in may be
forged headers along with the
6 matches
Mail list logo
