On 8/21/05, Jeff Gaines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
now and find it much better.
AOL that.
I've never gotten BayesIt to work, and I'm not the most
computer-illiterate person out there. When c't Magazin (renowned
German computer
Jeff Gaines said...
Hello Group
On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 8:33:48 PM, P. wrote:
So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and
guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that
helps.
I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have
Hello Group
On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 8:33:48 PM, P. wrote:
So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and
guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that
helps.
I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9
now and find it
Hi John,
JM let it install it and I've been training it, but I just don't work
JM anymore, or never did for that mater. I guess I'm going to have to
JM find something else, I don't know why they chose to bundle a plugin
JM with TheBat that would take years of training just to get it to work.
Hello Dave,
Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 9:42:05 AM, you wrote:
DT Thanks Mike
Always happy to be able to give back in some small way for all the
help I have gotten g
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.1 on Windows ME 4.90 Build
Hello MikeD,
On Tuesday, November 02, 2004 at 10:56:50 GMT -0500 (which was
16:56:50 where I live), MikeD (3) wrote and made these valuable points
on the subject of Bayesit:
Hello Dan,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 8:46:34 AM, you wrote:
DG Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here)
On Wednesday, October 20, 2004, 2:10:40 AM, MikeD wrote:
and I should also mention that the newest version is 0.7.3 and
since you are going to have to go through all that anyway, you might
want to get this version before you go through all that. It is much
improved over the version that was
Hello Stuart,
Saturday, October 16, 2004, 9:06:23 AM, you wrote:
SC Michael is using Version 3 which does not have the alternative tab.
I guess I will have to bite the bullet soon and move up to 3 g
--
Best regards,
MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat!
Hello MikeD,
Sunday, September 26, 2004, 8:08:39 PM, you wrote:
SMK I'm, using 06.6, which I thought was the latest version. BayesIt hasn't
SMK worked well for me since the version that came with The Bat 2.12; I don't
SMK remember its version number.
That would 0.5.11. It is what I continue
Paul,
PJ Can anyone point me to info regarding BayesIT and BayesFilter.
PJ What is the difference between them?
BayesIT will actually work if you can get it installed. I've never
been able to get the other one to do anything except grab program
focus for a couple of seconds and then give me
Hello Paul,
Monday, September 6, 2004, 2:13:39 PM, you wrote:
PJ Can anyone point me to info regarding BayesIT and BayesFilter.
PJ What is the difference between them?
BayesIT will actually work if you can get it installed. I've never
been able to get the other one to do anything except grab
Hello Graham,
Monday, June 21, 2004, 9:22:21 AM, you wrote:
GD Hello Andre,
GD Saturday, June 19, 2004, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
AW Hello Richard,
AW On 19 Jun 2004 at 05:33:38 +0500 GMT [02:33 CEST] you wrote:
RHS I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching about
RHS 95%
On 21 Jun 2004 at 09:22:21 you wrote:
GD I would be happy if I could catch 1 spam... :-(
GD I have SpamAssassin running on the mail server, it throws certain Spam into an IMAP
GD account for manual proofing - I mark all this and flag as Junk (training
GD BayesIt)
I don't think bayesit works
Hello Richard,
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:33:38 AM, you wrote:
RHS Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:13:08 AM, you wrote:
aacu I change to POPFiel from weeks of frsutration with BayesIt slowing
aacu down things, crashing the Bat etc.
RHS I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching
On Tuesday, April 20, 2004 at 2:13:52 PM, you wrote:
Hello Marek,
Monday, April 19, 2004, 5:24:55 PM, you wrote:
MM via options Mark as Junk and Mark as not Junk in Specials menu.
Since we have to use this now for all the training ... is there a way
to make these two functions more
Hello Philip,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 9:58:11 AM, you wrote:
PS However, at the moment, I'm only aware of one free filter plugin for
PS spam - bayesit - so this very nice feature of The Bat! goes unused as
PS yet. Hopefully you can now see why the plugin architecture is so
PS valuable, though.
Hi Philip,
On Friday, January 23, 2004 at 3:58 PM, Philip wrote:
Friday, January 23, 2004, 10:58:14 AM, you wrote:
T That's the same question I had. As I have SpamAssassin on the mail
T server, most of my spam gets caught and filtered that way, but I was
T hoping that this would catch the one
17 matches
Mail list logo
