Hello Maksym, Tuesday, January 27, 2004, 2:00:24 PM, you wrote:
MK> First things first, in this case you cannot (and should not) call your MK> character set "Default character set". Yes, we can - it's a shortened form of "Default character set for non-7-bit ASCII characters", but the latter is a way too long and much more confusing (how many people know what ASCII is and what are 7-bit characters anyway? :-) In fact, you are the only one complaining about the current behaviour as far as I can recall and you are complaining about it only because the mail client of your correspondent is not functioning properly. Won't that be a better solution to find a simple workaround (like adding an 8-bit character like your name in Cyrillic or non-breaking space Alt+0160 in your template) ? :-) MK> Also, as you see from the quted discussion at nobat.ru, the whole MK> issue shows some massive misunderstanding of (I would even say MK> "illiteracy in reading of") RFCs: people keep saying you've MK> implemented it this way because of RFC compliance Some people do believe that the current behaviour is more RFC-compliant, but my opinion (and experience) is - the current behaviour is more logical, safe and convenient. -- Cheers! Stefan
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
