Re[4]: RTF and /emphasis/

2002-10-30 Thread myob
Hello sjx, Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 11:10:16 PM, you wrote: >> And that's one of the ways Ameol - which I use too - /does/ score >> over The Bat! It's a small feature, but one I find very valuable. s> Oh, /that/. I remember that from Fidonet in ages of yore. s> Don't forget that it does have

Re[4]: RTF

2002-10-30 Thread Barry2
Hello Vishal, Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 3:36:02 AM, you wrote: VN> Just in so that TB developers realize more people want this, I VN> happen to think the suggestion of limited support for text VN> enhancements is a good one, provided it is done in a way that VN> allows it to show up alike univer

Re[4]: RTF

2002-10-29 Thread Anne
Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 8:26:30 PM, Mary wrote in message mid:196277568.20021029142630@;premiernet.net MB> Preferences, Viewer tab, the black on blue lettering Use viewer, MB> Click on the choice menu that is saying "Fixed width font" and change MB> to html/Rich Text viewer. Thanks Mary - I'd

Re[4]: RTF

2002-10-29 Thread Anne
Tuesday, October 29, 2002, 8:04:47 PM, Deborah wrote in message mid:5748999377.20021029200447@;oddoneout.free-online.co.uk DW> Options - Preferences - on the Viewer tab - the first box has a DW> drop-down box. It's very nicely done too, imo - you see the messages DW> in plain text, with a tab at t

Re[4]: RTF

2002-10-28 Thread Joseph N.
On Monday, October 28, 2002, Alec Burgess wrote in : > As does *Outlook Express* with /OE-QuoteFix/ ;-) > I thought _theBat_ did this too (I'm not using it yet). From this > conversation I gather it does *NOT* ? Alec, Correct, TB! cannot compose w

Re[4]: RTF

2002-10-28 Thread Joseph N.
On Monday, October 28, 2002, Mark Wieder wrote in : MW> Actually, I think it's exactly this thinking that led M$ MW> eventually to the executable attachments in Lookout. Folks MW> brainstormed about more and more features they'd like to see in MW>