Hello Thomas,
Doesn't that add up to a huge filter over time? Or do you weed out old
ignore-subjects sometimes?
No, I usually keep the list of subject to 6-10 because I also
Shift+Ctrl+M. And, as you say, weed out old ones every now and then.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial -
Hello Evandro,
BTW, isn't there a feature like ignore thread in The Bat!?
No, and I wish there was. I used such a feature in Virtual Access for
many years and, as I am subscribed to many mailing lists, I would
certainly use it in TB if it was available.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A.
Hello Adam,
Speaking of which, what proportion of folks do skip threads entirely
on such basis? Versus reading all mail.
I do.
I'd be curious. And I wonder too what ya do with threads with a bunch
of Unread status indicators, sort of glaring at you. And liable to
pull you back towards
Hello Arjan,
I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
that is being potsted on TBUDL.
Do you read the whole newspaper everyday or just those news/articles
whose headlines catch your attention?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat!
Hallo Arjan,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 03:56:08 +0200GMT (28-7-02, 3:56 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
AdG I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
AdG that is being potsted on TBUDL. If only to avoid the possibility
Well, that explains why you can be found posting
Hallo Adam,
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:01:46 -0230GMT (28-7-02, 2:31 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
A Speaking of which, what proportion of folks do skip threads
A entirely on such basis?
I do. I've got a very limited amount of time, that I'd prefer not to
spend on subjects that don't
Hi Adam,
on Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:01:46 -0230GMT (28.07.02, 02:31 +0200GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
A what proportion of folks do skip threads entirely on such basis? Versus
A reading all mail.
I sometimes have to. When I haven't had the time to read the
Hello Adam,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 2:31:46 AM you [A] wrote (at least in
part):
A Speaking of which, what proportion of folks do skip threads entirely
A on such basis?
Me. For example. If there's a thread I'm absolutely not interested in
I do remember the subject (most times) and if there
Hello Arjan,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 3:56:08 AM you [AdG] wrote (at least in
part):
AdG I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
AdG that is being potsted on TBUDL.
No. Simply No. Period. Nowhere is written I'm in duty to read every
mail coming through this list.
Hello Miguel,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 08:52:53 +0200 GMT (28/07/02, 13:52 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
MAU That is, assign to Ignore Colour Group (light gray), and add the
MAU subject to my Ignore filter, which marks the messages as Read and
MAU Ignored as they come in.
Doesn't that add up
Hi Peter.
At 9:29 AM on Sunday, July 28, 2002 you wrote the following
about [Skipping parts not interesting]:
PK [...] It would help greatly if the opposite could be
PK done: To mark interesting treads to follow in future
PK (Watch). This could be done if a flag would apply to
PK any future
Hello Miguel!
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 8:56:27 AM you wrote:
I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
that is being potsted on TBUDL.
This thread for example was one I wasn't interested in from the
subject. So I skipped it until I today saw Miguel's message with
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Lynn Turriff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every
message that is being potsted on TBUDL.
No. It is the right of every subscriber, but not the duty. I
read the first and maybe second message of every
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter
Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every
message that is being potsted on TBUDL.
No. Simply No. Period. Nowhere is written I'm in duty to read
every mail coming through this list. And I think
Hello Arjan,
On Sunday, July 28, 2002 at 10:18:03 PM you [AdG] wrote (at least in
part):
AdG Maybe I should apply more of those emoticons (hate them though)
AdG in the future.
Maybe one would have been enough? :-=)
Enough to indicate it's not meant THAT serious as it's written there :-)
Look
Hi Miguel,
It was Sunday, July 28, 2002, around 3:52:53 AM GMT -0300 when you wrote
the following about Skipping parts not interesting:
Miguel If from the subject I can't tell at first glance, I may read the first
Miguel message or two. If not interested, I Shif+Ctrl+M and mark the messages
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Arjan De Groot [ADG] wrote:
ADG To avoid further misunderstandings: my message was primarily
ADG aimed at TBUDL-subscribers who seem to have problems with the
ADG concept of reading before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Evandro De Brito Sperandio [EDB] wrote:
EDB BTW, isn't there a feature like ignore thread in The Bat!?
EDB Something like what some newsreaders have (Netscape Messenger,
EDB for example).
No,
Hello Allie,
Sunday, July 28, 2002, 6:56:16 PM, you wrote:
ACM No, there isn't one.
Wish there was one.
--
Best regards,
Greg Strong
TB! v1.62/Beta1 on Windows 98
PGP public keys:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0xB1FE63FABody=Please20send20keys
Hello Peter,
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 1:39:01 PM, you wrote:
PM You'd better not hit reply and change the subject, but start a new thread
PM with a new message instead. The Bat! can thread messages by references, and
PM that's how many users have set it up. So your mail appears in the thread
PM
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 5:31:46 PM, you wrote:
A Speaking of which, what proportion of folks do skip
A threads entirely on such basis? Versus reading all
A mail.
I do.
A I'd be curious. And I wonder too what ya do with
A threads with a bunch of Unread status indicators, sort
A of glaring at
In[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Lynn Turriff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be curious. And I wonder too what ya do with threads with a
bunch of Unread status indicators, sort of glaring at you. And
liable to pull you back towards them depending how you're
advancing to
Hello Arjan,
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002 03:56:08 +0200 GMT (28/07/02, 08:56 +0700 GMT),
Arjan de Groot wrote:
AdG I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
AdG that is being potsted on TBUDL.
No. It is the right of every subscriber, but not the duty. I read the
first and
Saturday, July 27, 2002, 8:14:11 PM, you wrote:
AdG I think it is the duty of every subscriber to read every message
AdG that is being potsted on TBUDL.
TF No. It is the right of every subscriber, but not the duty. I read the
TF first and maybe second message of every thread, and if it
24 matches
Mail list logo
