Hi Roelof,
Le lundi 29 juin 2009 à 12:50:31, vous écriviez :
> My suggestion would be to add all list addresses to a single address
> book group and and check whether the To header is part of that AB
> group.
> And forget about 'continue processing with other filters', that's not
> necess
Hello Roelof,
This is what you said on Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:50:31 +0200 your time:
> Off hand I can't think of any example where using 'continue
> processing' isn't contra-productive.
Well I created a main filter, set the condition for it to Any Message, and
then added sub filters to t
Hello Roelof,
This is what you said on Mon, 29 Jun 2009 12:50:31 +0200 your time:
> A filter without conditions won't be triggered by any message,
Yes, that's exactly what I would have thought. However...
I tested earlier and created a filter without any conditions and added three
sub filter
Hallo MFPA,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:33:03 +0100GMT (29-6-2009, 17:33 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
>> A filter without conditions won't be triggered by
>> any message,
M> He could just use the condition "any message". (-;
He could, but then he would need to set the option 'contin
Hi
On Monday 29 June 2009 at 11:50:31 AM, in
, Roelof Otten wrote:
> A filter without conditions won't be triggered by
> any message,
He could just use the condition "any message". (-;
> what you need is a filter that's triggered
> only by message list messages.
More elegant and efficien
Hallo Simon,
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:26:39 +0100GMT (29-6-2009, 11:26 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
P> Can I create a filter without any condition/action, other than to continue
processing
P> other filters?
A filter without conditions won't be triggered by any message, what
you need is a
Hello TBUDL,
Although a long time user of TB! I've never used subfilters.
I belong to a number of lists, including this one, so I want to 'group' the
filters for all lists under one main filter rather than having separate
filters in the filter list for each one.
Can I create a filter withou
7 matches
Mail list logo