Re: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Paul, On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:27:28 +1000GMT (18-1-2007, 6:27 , where I live), you wrote: PB When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles PB endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager. Can't confirm that with any version. Looks like something might be

Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Paul Berger
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 3:45:06 PM, you wrote: RA On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 at 15:27:28 +1000, Paul wrote: When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager. RA I don't experience a problem. What do

Re: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Alexander, On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:14:04 +0100GMT (18-1-2007, 10:14 , where I live), you wrote: So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 conditions in it. ASK You could copy paste the filter here for others to try it. He could copy and paste it to a text

Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Paul Berger
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 3:45:06 PM, you wrote: RA On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 at 15:27:28 +1000, Paul wrote: When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager. RA I don't experience a problem. What do

Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Paul Berger
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 7:14:04 PM, you wrote: ASK Hello Paul Berger everyone else, ASK on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 11:04 you (Paul Berger) wrote: So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 conditions in it. ASK You could copy

Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Paul Berger
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 7:17:58 PM, you wrote: RO Hallo Alexander, RO On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:14:04 +0100GMT (18-1-2007, 10:14 , where I RO live), you wrote: So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 conditions in it. ASK You could copy

Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Paul Berger
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 7:17:58 PM, you wrote: RO Hallo Alexander, RO On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 10:14:04 +0100GMT (18-1-2007, 10:14 , where I RO live), you wrote: So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 conditions in it. ASK You could copy

Re: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Paul, on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000GMT (18.01.2007, 11:04 +0100GMT here), you wrote: When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager. RA I don't experience a problem. What do you mean by recycles? PB The problem

Re: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Paul, On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000 GMT (18/01/2007, 17:04 +0700 GMT), Paul Berger wrote: PB The problem seems to be in only one of the filters. If I try to PB another condition, the list fades on screen and moves down the page, PB but never stops doing this. It does, eventually.

Re: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Alexander, On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:03:36 +0100 GMT (18/01/2007, 18:03 +0700 GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: It seems that it is best to limit each filter to 16 conditions. For additional conditions, use additional filter(s). Then there is no problem. ASK It would surprise me if the

Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Paul Berger
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 11:31:12 PM, you wrote: PM Hi Paul, PM on Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000GMT (18.01.2007, 11:04 +0100GMT here), PM you wrote: When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles endlessly, and have to close the bat from task

Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Paul Berger
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Friday, January 19, 2007, 12:26:21 AM, you wrote: TF Hello Paul, TF On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:04:42 +1000 GMT (18/01/2007, 17:04 +0700 GMT), TF Paul Berger wrote: PB The problem seems to be in only one of the filters. If I try to PB another condition, the list fades on

Re[2]: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Paul Berger
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED], Thursday, January 18, 2007, 8:27:20 PM, you wrote: ASK Hello Paul Berger everyone else, ASK on Thursday, January 18, 2007 at 11:30 you (Paul Berger) wrote: So it may be some corruption in that particular filter, that has 27 conditions in it. ASK You could copy

Re: Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-18 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Paul, on Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:07:55 +1000GMT (19.01.2007, 00:07 +0100GMT here), you wrote: PB The problem seems to be in only one of the filters. If I try to PB another condition, the list fades on screen and moves down the page, PB but never stops doing this. PB Have since added an extra

Sorting Office Problem

2007-01-17 Thread Paul Berger
When I try to add an item to the filters, sorting office recycles endlessly, and have to close the bat from task manager. Before I uninstall and reinstall an older version, is there a better fix? -- Paul -

Re: a sorting office problem

2002-05-17 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Michael, Problem solved while looking at headers, following your advice! Thank you! Glad to help if I can. Many times it is just that four eyes see more than two. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v1.60c

Re: a sorting office problem

2002-05-16 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello Michael, After that rule, there are various rules to sort messages into folders. The problem is that the color group rule is not working on TBUDL messages. Replies to me that are sorted into my 'known' folder get colored, but replies to me that are sorted into the TBUDL

Re[2]: a sorting office problem

2002-05-16 Thread Michael L. Cusac
On Thursday, May 16, 2002, Miguel A. Urech wrote to TBUDL: Let's try a couple of things. Problem solved while looking at headers, following your advice! Thank you! As you may recall, I had an exclusion which prevented messages from me being colored. MainSet: 01mlcusac Well, TBUDL

a sorting office problem

2002-05-15 Thread Michael L. Cusac
I've added a color group rule at the top of my list for incoming mail. It adds a message to a color group if the kludges contain my FQDN but the sender is not me, so that I can easily spot replies to my messages on mailing lists. (I only want it to do this for lists, but I will fine-tune the

Re: a sorting office problem

2002-05-15 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Michael, @15 May 2002, 21:41:41 Michael L. Cusac wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Replies to me that are sorted into my 'known' folder get colored, but replies to me that are sorted into the TBUDL folder are not. Check

Re: a sorting office problem

2002-05-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Michael, On Wed, 15 May 2002 21:41:41 GMTGMT (15-5-02, 23:41 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: MLC After that rule, there are various rules to sort messages into MLC folders. The problem is that the color group rule is not working on MLC TBUDL messages. Replies to me that

Re[2]: a sorting office problem

2002-05-15 Thread Michael L. Cusac
On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, Roelof Otten wrote to TBUDL: RO MLC After that rule, there are various rules to sort messages into RO MLC folders. The problem is that the color group rule is not working on RO MLC TBUDL messages. Replies to me that are sorted into my 'known' folder RO

Re: a sorting office problem

2002-05-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hello Michael, On Wed, 15 May 2002 23:14:29 GMTGMT (16-5-02, 1:14 +0200GMT, where I live), you wrote: MLC I've pasted the filter below. I've only obscured one of the email MLC addresses I use, in the second 'MainSet' line. I'm at a loss. -- Groetjes, Roelof

Re[2]: a sorting office problem

2002-05-15 Thread Michael L. Cusac
On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote to TBUDL: ... Replies to me that are sorted into my 'known' folder get colored, but replies to me that are sorted into the TBUDL folder are not. MDP Check the TBUDL filter - does it re-impose the default colour? It doesn't. This is very