Re: Spell Checker Request

2004-11-07 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Bill, On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 23:19:07 -0600GMT (7-11-2004, 6:19 +0100, where I live), you wrote: BM It is set for automatic checking. That doesn't stop BM the dialog OK box. I type fast enough that I often BM plan to go back but don't always make it before BM clicking on Send - that's why I

Spell Checker Request

2004-11-06 Thread Bill McCarthy
Hello TB User Discussion List, Two minor enhancements would make the spell checker more user friendly: (1) Add a `Mail anyway` dialog to `Cancel`. As it is, when one mails, say source code, with many spelling errors one has to either turn off spell checking or click on `Ignore all` many times.

Re: Spell Checker Request

2004-11-06 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Bill, On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 14:53:50 -0600GMT (6-11-2004, 21:53 +0100, where I live), you wrote: BM Two minor enhancements would make the spell checker BM more user friendly: Why not set the spell checker for automatic checking, it'll give you some coloured lines, but it won't bother you

Re: Spell Checker Request

2004-11-06 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Sat 6-Nov-04 6:25pm -0400, Roelof Otten wrote: Why not set the spell checker for automatic checking, it'll give you some coloured lines, but it won't bother you with dialogues. It is set for automatic checking. That doesn't stop the dialog OK box. I type fast enough that I often plan to