*/Reply
Sunday, June 11, 2000, 6:42:43 PM, you wrote:
DL -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
DL Hash: SHA1
DL Hi Allie,
DL On Sunday 11/06/2000 at 00:31, you wrote:
Hi,
I just now noted that TB! was using a whopping 37MB of
memory. I closed and restarted it and the memory
Hello Thomas,
On Monday, June 12, 2000 you wrote:
TF It also has a nice new feature, "purge and compress all folders".
TF Speaking of which, it uses up 100% of memory and does not release any
TF after the purgecompress is finished. (I just installed MemTurbo and
TF kind of monitor everything I
Hello Deryk,
On Sunday, June 11, 2000 you wrote:
DL I just recieved 38 messages, and it took about 5 minutes to import
DL them all. The hard disk is still chugging!
DL This is after upgrading to Windows Millennium RC0 - perhaps the hard
DL drive needs a defrag after installing all those files.
Hello all,
on Sat, 10 Jun 2000, at 18:31:39 local time (GMT -0500), Allie wrote:
Anyone else noting this?
nope, not really ...
been using TB! on off all day for sending/receiving and TaskInfo says it
now uses 4mb phys. memory and 10mb total virtual ...
i'll keep an eye on it.
Anyone else noting this?
Yep - I've noticed this from day one. Fortunately, I run MemTurbo
(www.memturbo.com), which fixes the problem. There are so many
programs that run under Windows that have memory leaks in them that
MemTurbo is a must-have feature, IMHO.
--
Jason Ellis, CEO
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000 17:13:47 +0200, Rob wrote:
Anyone else noting this?
R nope, not really ...
R been using TB! on off all day for sending/receiving and TaskInfo says it
R now uses 4mb phys. memory and 10mb total virtual ...
R i'll keep an eye on it.
R (running Win95 'classic' on a
Hallo Rob,
On Sun, 11 Jun 2000 23:46:53 +0800 GMT (11/06/2000, 23:46 +0800 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
R been using TB! on off all day for sending/receiving and TaskInfo says it
TF ^^^
TF
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Allie,
On Sunday 11/06/2000 at 00:31, you wrote:
Hi,
I just now noted that TB! was using a whopping 37MB of
memory. I closed and restarted it and the memory consumption was 6MB.
I've noted that the memory consumption increases with
Hello all,
on Mon, 12 Jun 2000, at 00:41:45 local time (GMT +0800), Thomas wrote:
[TaskInfo]
Yahoo was kind enough to give me a variety of download sites. Sorry I
didn't check first.
best site is www.iarsn.com ; the homepage ...
--
Rob
using The Bat! 1.42f
... Go the extra mile. It makes
Regarding my post about chugging in WinME... it was nothing to do with
TB! In fact, I booted up the system without launching it and as soon
as I moved the mouse pointer the hard disk started chugging - and
continued to do so even after a 10 minute walk to the shop!
A reformat did the disk good,
Hi Deryk,
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 01:04:15 +0100GMT (12/06/2000, 08:04 +0800GMT),
Deryk Lister wrote:
DL About installing 1.44 - what a nightmare! I had backed up the MAIL
DL directory from 1.41, and the only way to get all the messages back
DL was by installing 1.41 first and then upgrading :)
Hi Rob,
On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 00:41:07 +0200GMT (12/06/2000, 06:41 +0800GMT),
Rob wrote:
R [TaskInfo]
Yahoo was kind enough to give me a variety of download sites. Sorry I
didn't check first.
R best site is www.iarsn.com ; the homepage ...
Downloaded last night from exactly that site, but
Hi,
I just now noted that TB! was using a whopping 37MB of memory. I
closed and restarted it and the memory consumption was 6MB. I've noted
that the memory consumption increases with each mail check or send
operation. Each check or send increases the memory consumption here by
Hi Allie,
Saturday, June 10, 2000, 16:31:39, you wrote:
AM Hi,
AM I just now noted that TB! was using a whopping 37MB of memory. I
AM closed and restarted it and the memory consumption was 6MB. I've noted
AM that the memory consumption increases with each mail check or send
AM
Hello Rene Ertzinger,
On Sat, 10 Jun 2000 18:12:16 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, June 11, 2000, 8:12:16 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Rene Ertzinger wrote:
Hi Allie,
Saturday, June 10, 2000, 16:31:39, you wrote:
AM Hi,
AM I just now noted that TB! was using a whopping
15 matches
Mail list logo
