Re[2]: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-13 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Salutation Ottar On 12 May 2001 at 22:03:35 +0200 (which was 21:03 where I live) Ottar Grimstad might have written ... But could not this be the behavior of a priopritary inhouse mailserver? Yes. - -- Good Bye,

TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread daveiw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Please help, I receive messages from work under the address dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between the *n* and the *(* ). If I 'reply'to this message it of course goes back to the sender, however if I were

Re: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear daveiw On 12 May 2001 at 08:59:30 +0100 (which was 08:59 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] thoughtfully wrote the following Please help, I receive messages from work under the address dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between

Re: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread Thomas
Hello Dave, On Sat, 12 May 2001 08:59:30 +0100 GMT (12/05/2001, 15:59 +0800 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dcn Please help, I receive messages from work under the address dcn dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between the *n* and the dcn *(* ). If I 'reply'to this

Re: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello daveiw, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 9:59:30 AM, you wrote: dcn Please help, I receive messages from work under the dcn address dave.wilson (dept)@acompany.com ( note the space between dcn the *n* and the *(* ). If I 'reply'to this message it of course dcn goes back to the sender,

Re[2]: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread daveiw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 9:38:30 AM, you wrote: DE What is the [Reply To:] from the original email ? The 'Reply To' is Wilson, Dave I (Dept) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dept) - -- Best regards, Dave Wilson. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (E-mail me

Re[3]: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello daveiw On 12 May 2001 at 11:07:44 +0100 (which was 11:07 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points DE What is the [Reply To:] from the original email ? The 'Reply To' is Wilson, Dave I (Dept) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dept)

Re[4]: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread daveiw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi David, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 11:23:44 AM, you wrote: DE So if you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is wrong. DE What happens if you type [EMAIL PROTECTED] is that wrong ? Unfortunately neither go to my work address, but the other Dave.

Re: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello daveiw, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 12:07:44 PM, you wrote: dcn The 'Reply To' is Wilson, Dave I (Dept) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dept) What happens if you use exactly this address in the To: field of a new message? My guess is that you companys mail system uses the Wilson, Dave I (Dept) part

Re[5]: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hail Dave, On 12 May 2001 at 13:17:26 +0100 (which was 13:17 where I live) Dave Wilson wrote and made these points DE So if you send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is wrong. DE What happens if you type [EMAIL PROTECTED] is that wrong ?

Re: TB! and addressing.

2001-05-12 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello David, Saturday, May 12, 2001, 5:24:54 PM, you wrote: DE (3) I can not understand how any mail routed to you at work can DE get to you if it had been routed to Wilson, Dave I (Dept) DE [EMAIL PROTECTED] it must be looking at the info from DE Wilson, Dave I (Dept) and not [EMAIL PROTECTED]