Re[2]: TB! v1.49 - proper no addressee filter

2001-01-27 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello OK3, On Wednesday, January 24, 2001 19:14:08 [ +0400 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'TB! v1.49 - proper "no addressee" filter': OK3 String Location Presence OK3 --- OK3 ^To:KludgesNo OK3 Having Regular expressions on. P

Re[2]: TB! v1.49 - proper no addressee filter

2001-01-27 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello David, Thanks for your suggestion. On Wednesday, January 24, 2001 16:13:16 [ +0100 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'TB! v1.49 - proper "no addressee" filter': David Strings Location Presence David @Recipient No This may, in fact work

Re[2]: TB! v1.49 - proper no addressee filter

2001-01-26 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello OK3, On Wednesday, January 24, 2001 19:14:08 [ +0400 GMT], you wrote the following in regards to 'TB! v1.49 - proper "no addressee" filter': OK3 String Location Presence OK3 --- OK3 To: KludgesNo OK3 or OK3 String Location Pr

TB! v1.49 - proper no addressee filter

2001-01-24 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hello TBUDListers. What is the proper form to indicate to TB! via filter that if no addressee appears in "To:" to move msg to a certain (in my case, SPAM) folder. I tried this by leaving the Recipient rule blank but it captured too much maybe because I had it too high in the filter list.

Re: TB! v1.49 - proper no addressee filter

2001-01-24 Thread David Buntenbroich
Hello Jan, Wednesday, January 24, 2001, 3:53:29 PM, you wrote: What is the proper form to indicate to TB! via filter that if no addressee appears in "To:" to move msg to a certain (in my case, SPAM) folder. I tried this by leaving the Recipient rule blank but it captured too much