Thursday, 5/9/02, 4:14 PM
Hi Jonathan,
On Thu, 9 May 2002, at 09:02:18 [GMT -0500] (which was 7:02 AM where I live)
you wrote about: 'TB! v1.60i'
http://www.alsscan.com/main.html
J lol.. and there was me thinking that site would be humorous ;) Good
J job my monitor faces away from my office
Hello Mandara,
Wednesday, May 8, 2002, 6:39:57 PM, you wrote:
MAU Where did you download 1.60x from?
M http://www.alsscan.com/main.html
I don't think this version needs the kind of support provided from
this list. VBG
--
Best regards,
Greg Strong
TB! v1.60c on Windows
06 May 2002, 03:41, you wrote:
JA Yes... and if I understand the function right... if you press another
JA letter, it'll search your folder list for T{otherletter} for example
JA TH would try to match any folder starting TH
In fact, it will take you to the first instance of 'th'. For example,
Hello Mandara!
On Monday, May 6, 2002 at 4:17:32 AM you wrote:
*But*, if, while you are holding your finger on this key, there is
*no* this permanent, continual, perpetual, eternal, never ceasing and
ever lasting moving around in the cycles, and if this stops at any
time, then this is just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mandara,
@06 May 2002, 04:17:32 +0200 (03:17 UK time) Mandara wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... it moves to *all* folders with names starting with the letter
T,
*This* is the *old* way (and not so good way) it used to
Not on my copy of j. It takes that second letter as the first
character for another search.
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 10:41:20 PM, Jonathan wrote:
Yes... and if I understand the function right... if you press another
letter, it'll search your folder list for T{otherletter} for example
TH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gene,
@06 May 2002, 08:33:15 -0400 (13:33 UK time) Gene Gough wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not on my copy of j. It takes that second letter as the first
character for another search.
You may need to type more quickly
Hello Marck,
As a Emacs user, I have no problem with the concept of progressive search.
However is there a way to mark the end of the current progressive search so that
anything typed afterwards is considered to be part of a new search. For instance
if I have two folders named Foo1 and Foo2.
On Monday, May 06, 2002, Lynn Turriff wrote...
I'm not Marck, but can you not use wild cards on this
search? Will searching on 'foo*' not return all possible
'foo's'?
Lynn
I think somewhere the concept has been lost. If you had a number of
Foo folders for example, you'd have to type the
I'm not Marck, but can you not use wild cards on this
search? Will searching on 'foo*' not return all possible
'foo's'?
Lynn
Monday, May 6, 2002, 10:09:53 AM, you wrote:
AXC Hello Marck,
AXC As a Emacs user, I have no problem with the concept
AXC of progressive search.
AXC However is there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gene Gough [GG] wrote:
...
GG Not on my copy of j. It takes that second letter as the first
GG character for another search.
When you type two or more characters TB! needs to differentiate
whether you need to add another letter to the initial one to
You are correct. Now do we get speed typing lessons when we purchased
THE BAT! ?Muhahahaha
Monday, May 6, 2002, 3:41:04 PM, Allie wrote:
GG Not on my copy of j. It takes that second letter as the first
GG character for another search.
When you type two or more characters TB! needs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gene Gough [GG] wrote:
...
GG You are correct. Now do we get speed typing lessons when we
GG purchased THE BAT! ? Muhahahaha
The quickly I mentioned isn't quick to the point where you need speed
typing lessons.
- --
-=Allie C Martin=-
List
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 May 2002, at 03:29:13 -0800 Lynna wrote:
LL Is that a email addiction?
Definitely. You should enter the club of E-mailaholics International.
Mandara
- --
(__) If you need this key:
('') mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0x257DFF36
\/
Hello Mandara,
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 3:25:37 AM, you digitally penned the following:
M Again, don't turn PGP off, since there is no reason for it; this
M system is readable for all. But if you are using MS CryptoAPI then you
M should count on that that some of us cannot read those messages.
It
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Lynna Lunsford wrote:
Hello Mandara,
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 3:25:37 AM, you digitally penned the following:
M Again, don't turn PGP off, since there is no reason for it; this
M system is readable for all. But if you are using MS CryptoAPI then you
M should count on that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 May 2002, at 09:52:07 -0800 Lynna wrote:
M Again, don't turn PGP off, since there is no reason for it; this
M system is readable for all. But if you are using MS CryptoAPI then you
M should count on that that some of us cannot read those
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mandara,
@05 May 2002, 23:15:40 +0200 (22:15 UK time) Mandara wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would bravely endure all other bugs, just if they would give me
back my browsing by the first letter of... etc. :-E
I prefer the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 May 2002, at 22:51:11 +0100 Marck wrote:
I would bravely endure all other bugs, just if they would give me
back my browsing by the first letter of... etc. :-E
MDP I prefer the improvement myself.. browse by progressive search. Much
MDP
On Mon, 6 May 2002, Mandara wrote:
On Sun, 5 May 2002, at 22:51:11 +0100 Marck wrote:
I would bravely endure all other bugs, just if they would give me
back my browsing by the first letter of... etc. :-E
MDP I prefer the improvement myself.. browse by progressive search. Much
MDP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mandara,
@06 May 2002, 01:21:34 +0200 (00:21 UK time) Mandara wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If this progressive search is faster than putting a finger on a
key, than I would highly appreciate instructions how to do that.
Hello Jonathan,
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 4:45:23 PM, you digitally penned the following;
JA I think what it means is you type the first letter, and it matches the
JA first folder that it reaches... when you type the second letter, it tries
JA to find the next folder that begins with letter 1... AND
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 May 2002, at 17:19:12 -0800 Lynna wrote:
JA I think what it means is you type the first letter, and it
JA matches the first folder that it reaches... when you type the
JA second letter, it tries to find the next folder that begins with
JA
Hello Mandara,
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 6:17:32 PM, you digitally penned the following;
M Dear Lynna, it seems very near, so just do the next, please: you have
M only to place your cursor in the folder pane and to press a T key on
M the keyboard. Then, *hold* your finger on this key *all the time*
Good evening list,
Has anybody had bad experiences with TB! v1.60i ?
--
Best regards,
Luc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by The Bat! version 1.60c with Windows 2000 (build 2195),
version 5.0 and using the best
Hello Luc,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 10:58:22 AM, you digitally penned the following;
L Good evening list,
L Has anybody had bad experiences with TB! v1.60i ?
Skipped I and went straight to J.
--
Regards,
Lynnamailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat!1.60j
Good evening Lynna,
It was foretold that on 5-5-2002 @ 23:07:20 GMT-0800 (which was
9:07:20 where I live) Lynna Lunsford wrote and spread these wise
comments on TB! v1.60i:
snipped a bit
LL Skipped I and went straight to J.
But that is still beta, isn't it?
--
Best regards,
Luc
Hello Luc,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:06:07 PM, you digitally penned the following;
L But that is still beta, isn't it?
Well, I admit the download link was on the beta site but at one point I
thought that moderators said that these letter series a, b, c, d, e, f, g,
h, i, j were bug - fixes
This message (below) is marked INVALID SIGNATURE. The next one is not marked.
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 3:07:20 AM, Lynna wrote:
Hello Luc,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 10:58:22 AM, you digitally penned the following;
L Good evening list,
L Has anybody had bad experiences with TB! v1.60i
This message, (below) sent at almost the same time a previous is NOT
marked INVALID SIGNATURE
Sunday, May 5, 2002, 4:20:46 AM, Lynna wrote:
Hello Luc,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 12:06:07 PM, you digitally penned the following;
L But that is still beta, isn't it?
Well, I admit the
Hello Gene,
Saturday, May 4, 2002, 3:19:05 PM, you digitally penned the following;
GG Hi Lynna,
GG I was not concerned about the signature but was wondering how the
GG messages that had the exact same time stamp on them could be different
GG in the valid test.. I now suspect it was just that
31 matches
Mail list logo
