Re: [notspam] Re: The Bat + POPFile + XRay

2004-04-30 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 12:04:33 +0100, Marten Gallagher wrote: OF COURSE (AND I AM DELIBERATELY SHOUTING) IF WE HAD A SYSTEM OF CHANGING ACCOUNT PROPERTIES ACROSS ALL ACCOUNTS AT ONCE THIS WOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM... Nonsense. ??? You want to turn TB! into some kind of mailserver. TB! is not a

Re: [notspam] Re: The Bat + POPFile + XRay

2004-04-29 Thread Marten Gallagher
On Thursday, April 29, 2004 at 5:04:00 AM, you wrote: With 38 email accounts it is a nightmare changing every account's SMTP server when I move from one connecion method to another. Ah, but XRay will do it automatically with no action on your part. Absolutely painless and invisible, provided

Re: [notspam] Re: The Bat + POPFile + XRay

2004-04-29 Thread Marten Gallagher
On Thursday, April 29, 2004 at 1:11:57 AM, you wrote: OF COURSE (AND I AM DELIBERATELY SHOUTING) IF WE HAD A SYSTEM OF CHANGING ACCOUNT PROPERTIES ACROSS ALL ACCOUNTS AT ONCE THIS WOULDN'T BE A PROBLEM... Nonsense. ??? (Btw. Your signature is TOO LONG.) Whoops - wrong template - will

Re: [notspam] Re: The Bat + POPFile + XRay

2004-04-29 Thread Robin Anson
On Thu 29 April 2004, 21:07:36 +1000, Marten Gallagher wrote: Ah, but XRay will do it automatically with no action on your part. Absolutely painless and invisible, provided that for each SMTP server you need to use you can identify a unique IP address range that your laptop will have been

Re: The Bat + POPFile + XRay

2004-04-29 Thread Matthias Brucke
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:19:14 +0100, Marten Gallagher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With 38 email accounts it is a nightmare changing every account's SMTP server when I move from one connecion method to another. Try using hamster, it is a mail and news server with scripting possibilities. I let

Re[2]: [notspam] Re: The Bat + POPFile + XRay

2004-04-29 Thread Marten Gallagher
On Thu 29 April 2004, 21:07:36 +1000, Marten Gallagher wrote: Ah, but XRay will do it automatically with no action on your part. Absolutely painless and invisible, provided that for each SMTP server you need to use you can identify a unique IP address range that your laptop will have been

Re[2]: [notspam] Re: The Bat + POPFile + XRay

2004-04-29 Thread Marten Gallagher
No, I mean the IP address of your laptop. In my office, my laptop gets assigned an IP address in the range 192.168.0.0-192.168.0.255 For one of my ISPs it gets 203.34.171.0-203.34.171.255 or 203.222.89.0-203.34.89.255 For another of my ISPs it gets 203.133.246.0-203.133.246.255 or

The Bat + POPFile + XRay

2004-04-28 Thread Marten Gallagher
Hi Has anyone got any experience of running TB with POPFile *and* XRay (to select SMTP server). From loking at the documentation for XRay it seems its adding another link in the server chain. I wonder if that could all be too mcuh and it will all fall over. It's just that I have three ways of

Re: The Bat + POPFile + XRay

2004-04-28 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:19:14 +0100, Marten Gallagher wrote: Has anyone got any experience of running TB with POPFile *and* XRay (to select SMTP server). I have experience with TB! with SpamPal with FTGate 2.2 *and* X-Ray, all running seemlessly together. From loking at the documentation for

Re: The Bat + POPFile + XRay

2004-04-28 Thread Robin Anson
On Thu 29 April 2004, 9:19:14 +1000, Marten Gallagher wrote: Has anyone got any experience of running TB with POPFile *and* XRay (to select SMTP server). Yes From loking at the documentation for XRay it seems its adding another link in the server chain. Yes I wonder if that could all be