On Thursday, December 09, 1999, Ali Martin wrote:
> They fixed a couple problems between the 7th Dec release and the 8th
> Dec release. I don't know the specifics though.
I ended up downloading 2 files from different sources, I think, but
anyway, one of the files was dated November 20something,
On Thursday, December 09, 1999 Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
> *.lng file is updated more often, it's just a part of Intpack. It
> contains *actual* string resources for the foreign languages
> supported (if you understand what I mena:-)). But you'll need
> Intpack itself to use *.lng file...
Yo
Friday, December 10, 1999
Hello Mark,
Thursday, Thursday, December 09, 1999, you wrote:
Mark> Hi Douglas,
Mark> Thursday, December 09, 1999, 7:50:09 AM, you wrote:
DH>> What's THEBAT.LNG? A Linux / Gnu version?
Mark> If only.no it's The Bat's language pack, which allows you to
Mark
Hi Douglas,
on Friday, December 10, 1999, 5:25:34 AM GMT+0800, Douglas Hinds wrote:
TF>> ...Today I downloaded from the official site
TF>> ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe, ... On the beta site, you
TF>> get only the executable, whereas the official site has a
TF>> self-extracting file.
Hi Alexander,
on Friday, December 10, 1999, 6:14:28 AM GMT+0800, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote:
AVK> The size of Intpack is due to the number of foreign languaages
AVK> currently supported, it's growth in size is therefore inevitable
AVK> too.
True; it's getting bigger than The Bat! itself. I un
Hi there!
On 9 Dec 99, at 15:25, Douglas Hinds wrote
about "Re[6]: Upgrading, backuping/restori":
> TF> ...Today I downloaded from the official site
> TF> ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe, ... On the beta site, you
> TF> get only the executable, whereas the official site has a
> TF> s
Hello Thomas & all fellow TBUDL members,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, Thomas wrote:
TF> ...Today I downloaded from the official site
TF> ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/the_bat.exe, ... On the beta site, you
TF> get only the executable, whereas the official site has a
TF> self-extracting file.
Do
Hello Mark,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, 3:21:19 AM, you wrote in response to my saying:
DH>> What's THEBAT.LNG? A Linux / Gnu version?
MA> If only.no
I'm told one's in the works.
MA> it's The Bat's language pack, which allows you to
MA> change the interface language.
Thanks. I use
Hi Douglas,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, 7:50:09 AM, you wrote:
DH> What's THEBAT.LNG? A Linux / Gnu version?
If only.no it's The Bat's language pack, which allows you to
change the interface language.
--
Best regards,
Mark
Using The Bat! 1.38
under Windows 98 4 10 Build 1998
-
Hi Douglas,
on Thursday, December 09, 1999, 4:04:25 PM GMT+0800, Douglas Hinds wrote:
TF>> I have jsut downloaded the third official version of 1.38...
DH> Third? I'm downloading now from:
DH> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
DH> And the site says: Download The Bat! 1.38 Release secon
Douglas Hinds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TF>> I have jsut downloaded the third official version of 1.38...
> Third? I'm downloading now from:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
> And the site says: Download The Bat! 1.38 Release second revision
> Am I at the wrong site or is the te
Hello Thomas & all fellow TBUDL members,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, 12:57:51 AM, Thomas wrote:
TF> I have jsut downloaded the third official version of 1.38...
Third? I'm downloading now from:
http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/beta.html
And the site says: Download The Bat! 1.38 Release second
Hello Ali & all fellow TBUDL members,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, Ali wrote in response to my saying:
>> I download and installed v. 1.38 (apparently not a beta) yesterday,
>> Dec. seventh from the ritlabs beta site. Was a revision uploaded on the
>> eighth or do I have the latest one?
AM> Th
Hi Stefan,
on Thursday, December 09, 1999, 3:49:47 AM GMT+0800, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
ST> This is fixed in the today's revision of 1.38. Please feel free to
ST> download it :-)
I have jsut downloaded the third official version of 1.38 - should we
mention download date and when when we report a
Douglas Hinds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I download and installed v. 1.38 (apparently not a beta) yesterday,
> Dec. seventh from the ritlabs beta site. Was a revision uploaded on the
> eighth or do I have the latest one?
They fixed a couple problems between the 7th Dec release and the
Hello Stefan & all fellow TBUDL members,
Wednesday, December 08, 1999, Stefan wrote:
ST> Received: from mail.ritlabs.com by thebat.dutaint.com Date: Wed,
ST> 08 Dec 1999 21:49:47 +0200 From: Stefan Tanurkov
ST> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re[2]: Upgrading, backuping/restoring,
ST> account fold
Dear Christopher,
CJT> OK, testing done. It seems that qtp and fld aren't needed, but srt
CJT> needs to be there even if it is only a zero-byte file...
This is fixed in the today's revision of 1.38. Please feel free to
download it :-)
Sincerely,
Stefan
..."It is neither wealt
> I'm not sure if you can delete files *.srt, *.qtp *.fld when you have
> corresponding *.srx *.qtn *.flx... Maybe I'll test it later...
OK, testing done. It seems that qtp and fld aren't needed, but srt
needs to be there even if it is only a zero-byte file...
--
Christopher J. Trybowski
On Wednesday, December 08, 1999 NDS8nz wrote:
> Would like to know if I can upgrade my registered version 1.35 to
> 1.36 without a problem.
Sure you can. You can either download only the executable file or the
whole distribution (in 1.38 help file is also upgraded!). You can
safely re-i
19 matches
Mail list logo
