Hello Peter,
> as of my tests it also depends on WHERE you write the "%clear%-" sequence.
>
> If it appears anywhere inside the QT or - as in my case - at the end, it works
> like expected and documented. If it appears at the top of the QT it shows the
> bug (I think it is a bug) as described by
Good evening Alexander,
on Thu, 19 May 2005 18:23:42 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote:
ASK> Surprising that the position of %CLEAR in the QT is not important... not
ASK> very logic if you ask me.
That has been always true, AFAICR.
ASK> Should I file a bug report?
Regarding the %clear%- beha
Hello Peter Hampf & everyone else,
on 19-Mai-2005 at 14:24 you (Peter Hampf) wrote:
> as of my tests it also depends on WHERE you write the "%clear%-" sequence.
> If it appears anywhere inside the QT or - as in my case - at the end, it works
> like expected and documented. If it appears at the t
Hello MAU,
on Thu, 19 May 2005 01:56:30 +0200 GMT your local time you wrote:
M> ,- [ QT1 ]
M> | %CLEAR
M> | This QT will work as expected.
M> `-
M> but
M> ,- [ QT2 ]
M> | %CLEAR%-
M> | This one will do what you are seeing.
M> `-
as of my tests it also depends on WHERE you write
Hello Alexander,
> However, when I create a QT with %CLEAR as the first line and insert it
> with its handle in a reply, the originally generated text (with the default
> template) is *not* cleared. It looks to me as if the %CLEAR macro clears
> only the text *below* the current cursor position. H
Hello everyone,
the helpfile says that the %CLEAR macro, when used in a quick template,
clears all previously generated/created text. Thats exactly what I need.
[I wanted to create a "TOFU" quick template for the rare occasions where I
need it ("TOFU" is a hybrid german english abbreweryiation me
6 matches
Mail list logo