Re: V 3.0 serious bug on LAN

2004-09-04 Thread Dean
Hello John, Friday, September 3, 2004, 4:28:52 AM, you wrote: : JP V3.0 Professional (upgraded from 2.12) downloads the mail from the server, JP then it disappears in thin air. JP Back to 2.12, no such problem. I put in a notice when V3 came out about this very problem. Not only I may get

Re: V 3.0 serious bug on LAN

2004-09-04 Thread John Phillips
Hi Dean, On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, at 23:58:57 [GMT-0500] (which was Sun, 14:58:57 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: I put in a notice when V3 came out about this very problem. Not only I may get a few sporadic emails out of several hundred ( the # is building each day) and only one will delete

V 3.0 serious bug on LAN

2004-09-03 Thread John Phillips
Hi Bat! Fans, Running V3.0 on LAN, XPPro SP2 to a Windoze 2000 Mail server. V3.0 Professional (upgraded from 2.12) downloads the mail from the server, then it disappears in thin air. Back to 2.12, no such problem. Reported to Bat! but not holding my breath waiting for a reply. -- John

Re: V 3.0 serious bug on LAN

2004-09-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 19:28:52 +1000GMT (3-9-2004, 11:28 +0200, where I live), you wrote: JP Running V3.0 on LAN, XPPro SP2 to a Windoze 2000 Mail server. JP V3.0 Professional (upgraded from 2.12) downloads the mail from the server, JP then it disappears in thin air. What plug-ins are

Re: V 3.0 serious bug on LAN

2004-09-03 Thread John Phillips
Hi Roelof, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, at 11:36:50 [GMT+0200] (which was 19:36:50 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: What plug-ins are you using? Bat! gets mail through SpamPal on port 110. No plug ins as such. Your server, is that pop3 or imap? POP3 running MDaemon. The LAN itself should

Re: V 3.0 serious bug on LAN

2004-09-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo John, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 19:53:50 +1000GMT (3-9-2004, 11:53 +0200, where I live), you wrote: What plug-ins are you using? JP Bat! gets mail through SpamPal on port 110. JP No plug ins as such. What happens if you close and bypass SpamPal? (Apart from getting spam that is.) Your

Re: V 3.0 serious bug on LAN

2004-09-03 Thread John Phillips
Hi Roelof, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, at 12:31:01 [GMT+0200] (which was 20:31:01 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: What happens if you close and bypass SpamPal? (Apart from getting spam that is.) Haven't tried that, but all worked fine previously on 2.12, and now still does, so I don't think

Re: V 3.0 serious bug on LAN

2004-09-03 Thread Allie Martin
John Phillips, [JP] wrote: What happens if you close and bypass SpamPal? (Apart from getting spam that is.) Haven't tried that, but all worked fine previously on 2.12, and now still does, so I don't think that can be the problem? TB! v3 is different from TB! v2.12. It could very well be a

Re: V 3.0 serious bug on LAN

2004-09-03 Thread John Phillips
Hi Allie, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, at 06:28:41 [GMT-0500] (which was 21:28:41 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: TB! v3 is different from TB! v2.12. It could very well be a problem with SpamPal. But I guess it's a matter of how much you wish to have v3 work for you. I will try on Monday