Re[2]: behavior of ritlabs is dangerous !

2004-09-05 Thread Denis
> But who knows? Maybe they find that 1st of march is a good release date for > a major version, too? Make that 1st of April instead. It sure will look even more serious to anyone. -- Denis Current version is 3.00.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information

Re: behavior of ritlabs is dangerous !

2004-09-03 Thread Frank Sproede
On Friday, September 3, 2004 at 5:42:47 PM, Alexander S. Kunz wrote: > But who knows? Maybe they find that 1st of march is a good release date for > a major version, too? 05/03/31 would be perfect for the v4/beta1. Regards, Frank -- Current ve

Re: behavior of ritlabs is dangerous !

2004-09-03 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello DanG, 03-Sep-2004 16:48, you wrote: > I would have expected to get a year out of my subscription If Ritlabs would declare their fees as being exactly that (a yearly subscribtion) and the annual price was about that of the update price, I'd have *no* problem - on the contrary, I'd be very g

Re: behavior of ritlabs is dangerous !

2004-09-03 Thread DanG
Message received at: 9/1/2004:9:07 AM W> My behavior with IT is to never pay for a soft. That why I always W> use free software (GNU, open office, ...) W> (And for windows XP : XP was packaged with my labtop ! :-) ) W> Watch out, I don't speak about illegal version ! It's not a good W> behavior to

behavior of ritlabs is dangerous !

2004-09-01 Thread WilWilWil
My behavior with IT is to never pay for a soft. That why I always use free software (GNU, open office, ...) (And for windows XP : XP was packaged with my labtop ! :-) ) Watch out, I don't speak about illegal version ! It's not a good behavior to... For the first time of my life, I take my credi