Hallo lex,
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 03:25:18 +0100GMT (3-10-2007, 4:25 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO What do you see when you hit F9 with a corrupted message?
L Well, first of all: THANKS FOR THAT! (Get to see the messages now)
In that case the message isn't corrupted, as it's stored properly
Hallo lex,
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 20:58:22 +0100GMT (1-10-2007, 21:58 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO To prevent this kind of problems in the future, you've got to 'purge
RO and compress' regularly. (I prefer to do so on exit.)
L I hit cancel mostly, as it takes to long and when I close down
Tuesday, October 2, 2007, 8:53:26 AM, you wrote:
RO If you've got a time that TB is running while you aren't behind the
RO computer (dinner time or whatever) you can create a schedule that runs
RO the folder maintenance at that time.
yes i know, but in practice, somehow i seem to be behind the
Hallo lex,
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 22:42:08 +0100GMT (2-10-2007, 23:42 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
L If i hit 'reply' on a corrupted mail, it takes the text out of the
L *last seen* mail as original text. Maybe this info helps?
What do you see when you hit F9 with a corrupted message?
What are
Thursday, September 27, 2007, 4:44:39 PM, you wrote:
RO To prevent this kind of problems in the future, you've got to 'purge
RO and compress' regularly. (I prefer to do so on exit.)
I hit cancel mostly, as it takes to long and when I close down the bat!,
that's normally when i want to go to bed.
Hi,
it's happened three times now in the last few days: someone sends me a
mail, when i select it to preview it in the window beneath it, it's
just grey, as if there is no message. If I hit the rply button, the
text of another message is placed as the original text/mail.
In all cases I knew
Hallo lex,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:56:12 +0100GMT (27-9-2007, 11:56 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
L it's happened three times now in the last few days: someone sends me a
L mail, when i select it to preview it in the window beneath it, it's
L just grey, as if there is no message. If I hit the
Hello Roelof,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:44:39 +0200 your time, you said:
RO TB handles better with 100 folders with 1000 messages each than with one
RO folder with 10 messages.
Is this a documented limitation of TB!? Or is it purely a limitation
discovered at the expense of TB! users?
--
Hallo Simon,
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:57:30 +0100GMT (27-9-2007, 17:57 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO TB handles better with 100 folders with 1000 messages each than with one
RO folder with 10 messages.
IT Is this a documented limitation of TB!? Or is it purely a limitation
IT discovered
9 matches
Mail list logo
