since 1994 every spam list in the world has me on their list.
So, reeling this back around to TB!, that is my reason for
putting the Known filter first.
M Anyway, if you put your Known filter first, you will see some
M spam messages leaking through as you say in your original
M post.
I don't mind
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 5:54:23 PM, Allie wrote:
A This thread has now been declared DEAD . as in DEAD
A HORSE!!
I wasn't trying to get a POPFile/SpamPal battle going.
What I'm trying to do is learn what the logic/algorithm is that
TB! uses for the Known filter. If that could be answered
Hello Dave,
M Anyway, if you put your Known filter first, you will see some
M spam messages leaking through as you say in your original
M post.
I don't mind the leaking per se; it's not understanding the
reason for the leak that is keeping me awake nights. :)
I'm telling you but you don't
16-Jul-2003 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm telling you but you don't belive me. The reason for the leaks is you
put your Known filter first :-)
What Dave Kennedy wants to know is which fields of a message DOES the Known
filter compare with the given address book?
You know, FROM
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 11:53:18 AM, Alexander wrote:
A 16-Jul-2003 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A What Dave Kennedy wants to know is which fields of a message
A DOES the Known filter compare with the given address book?
A You know, FROM, TO, REPLY-TO, etc. etc.
Thank you! I'm glad someone
Hello Alexander,
What Dave Kennedy wants to know is which fields of a message DOES the Known
filter compare with the given address book?
You know, FROM, TO, REPLY-TO, etc. etc.
Ah, that? I didn't know he was asking that ;-)
It's the Sender's address. At least that is what the Known filter
Hello Alexander,
16-Jul-2003 17:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd prefer you don't quote my e-mail address in the body.
Thanks,
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62r | Using
On Wed 16-Jul-03 3:56pm -0400, MAU wrote:
And what is sender? Help/Find/sender :)
Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics returned?
I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and Return-Path: but I
didn't find a definitive list. Have I missed any?
--
Best regards,
Bill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bill,
@16-Jul-2003, 16:31 -0400 (21:31 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
And what is sender? Help/Find/sender :)
BM Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics
BM returned?
BM I know Sender checks
On Wed 16-Jul-03 4:37pm -0400, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
@16-Jul-2003, 16:31 -0400 (21:31 UK time) Bill McCarthy [BM] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to MAU:
And what is sender? Help/Find/sender :)
BM Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics
BM returned?
BM I know Sender
Hello Bill,
Could you be more specific - i.e. which of the 25 topics returned?
Not rally, I didn't read them all. I didn't even count them like you
did.
I know Sender checks From:, Sender:, Reply-To: and Return-Path: but I
didn't find a definitive list. Have I missed any?
I think you are
checked ~30 spams with my e-mail in the To: that didn't leak and
none have it in the Return-Path.
So, now the question becomes - what next? Hmmm. I looked at the
suggestion of creating my own Known filter, but the choice in the
Location column is TB!'s generic (and pervasive) Sender. Looks
like
Hello Dave,
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 17:22:53 -0400 GMT (17/07/03, 04:22 +0700 GMT),
Dave Kennedy wrote:
So, now the question becomes - what next? Hmmm. I looked at the
suggestion of creating my own Known filter, but the choice in the
Location column is TB!'s generic (and pervasive) Sender. Looks
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, 7:01:34 PM, Thomas wrote:
T I have a question to those who have their own address in their
T AB: What is the reason?
My reasons are pretty simple. I have many mail groups - tennis
team, swim team board, basketball board, school parents, etc.
(Hmmm. There's a theme
that spammers sometimes put your email address in one
| of the sender fields, such as Return-Path.
`
So, now the question becomes - what next? Hmmm. I looked at the
suggestion of creating my own Known filter, but the choice
On Wed 16-Jul-03 7:01pm -0400, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I have a question to those who have their own address in their AB:
What is the reason? - If you keep BBC'ing yourself, you type your own
address into the BBC field once, and the history function will always
autocomplete (faster than
What is the logic for the Inbox - Known automatic filtering in
conjunction with the address book?
The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
through, and I suspect that the Inbox-Known filtering is causing
it to trigger. But, I'm not sure of the details of the
Inbox-Known
Hello Dave,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:49:16 AM, you wrote:
DK What is the logic for the Inbox - Known automatic filtering in
DK conjunction with the address book?
DK The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
DK through, and I suspect that the Inbox-Known filtering
15-Jul-2003 15:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The related problem is some POPFile identified spam
Just a thought about combined measures...
I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal alone (DNS
blacklist
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 12:52:27 PM, MikeD wrote:
M Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 8:49:16 AM, Dave K wrote:
DK What is the logic for the Inbox - Known automatic
DK filtering in conjunction with the address book?
M The problem is that enough spammers have figured this out and
M they are spoofing your
Hello neurowerx, you wrote:
I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal alone (DNS
blacklist feature). I only use the Bayesian plugin to Spampal as an
addition (the few mails that get thru first place make
address book for that very
reason sigh
It's true that spammers sometimes put your email address in one of the
sender fields, such as Return-Path.
Taking your address out of the address book is a bit extreme. A
possibly better approach is to disable the Known filter.
Create your own Known filter
Hello Dave,
The related problem is some POPFile identified spam is leaking
through, and I suspect that the Inbox-Known filtering is causing
it to trigger. But, I'm not sure of the details of the
Inbox-Known algorithm to debug this issue.
Are you using any filter to sort messages classified
Hello neurowerx,
I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only measure
again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal alone (DNS
blacklist feature).
Because, for example in my case, I'm getting a 99.71 accuracy with
POPFile alone which, as you probably know,
Hello John,
But imagine my surprise... Now I have to say, without a doubt, that
SpamPal is better than PopFile.
Can I say that I doubt it? :-)
SpamPal also makes less mistakes than PopFile.
Can SpamPal do much better than 99,71% accuracy? I doubt it, because
even 100% isn't that much more
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 3:09:00 PM, MAU wrote:
M Are you using any filter to sort messages classified as spam
M by POPFile? If so, this filter should be placed _before_ the
M Known filter.
I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes people I want to get
e-mail from will send a note that has spam
15-Jul-2003 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about other Bayesian filters but for POPFile, for example
IP addresses are just words that it can use to classify messages. And
it sure does learn and use IP lists.
Good point. However, I believe that DNS blacklists are updated faster
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 at 6:38 PM, neurowerx wrote:
I wonder why many people are using Bayes filtering as the only
measure again spam. 95% of the spam I get is being caught by SpamPal
alone (DNS blacklist feature). I only use the Bayesian plugin to
Spampal as an addition (the few mails
Hello neurowerx,
Good point. However, I believe that DNS blacklists are updated faster than
popfile will learn IP addresses when you teach them manually.
I don't teach IPs to POPFile. It learns by itself. The only thing I tell
POPFile is if a message it has classified as spam and it isn't, or
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 3:19 PM, you wrote:
SpamPal also makes less mistakes than PopFile.
M Can SpamPal do much better than 99,71% accuracy? I doubt it, because
M even 100% isn't that much more ;-)
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work, but because
I finally noticed
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:28:47 PM, Dave Kennedy wrote:
DK Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 3:09:00 PM, MAU wrote:
M Are you using any filter to sort messages classified as spam
M by POPFile? If so, this filter should be placed _before_ the
M Known filter.
DK I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes
Hello Dave,
I've got the Known filter first. Sometimes people I want to get
e-mail from will send a note that has spam-like material in it. I
don't want to lose those messages.
Loose messages No matter what method, program, filter, whatever, you
use to detect spam you should not delete
15-Jul-2003 22:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work, but because
I finally noticed that the slowdown in receiving mail was only on the
accounts that had spampal setup. Now I am back to getting my mail FAST.
I'd say that depends on how
On Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 4:19 PM, you wrote:
nwd 15-Jul-2003 22:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work, but because
I finally noticed that the slowdown in receiving mail was only on the
accounts that had spampal setup. Now I am back to
Hello Terry,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:03:03 PM, you wrote:
T I use Popfile alone because it *doesn't* use DNS blacklists. I have
T philosophical issues with DNS blacklists. And, at 99% + accuracy,
T Popfile makes it really easy for me to stick to my principles. :)
Moderator
This is not
Hello neurowerx,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 2:32:42 PM, you wrote:
nwd 15-Jul-2003 21:16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know about other Bayesian filters but for POPFile, for example
IP addresses are just words that it can use to classify messages. And
it sure does learn and use IP lists.
Hello MAU, you wrote:
Can I say that I doubt it? :-)
Yes, you can, but have you tried SpamPal?
I can honestly say I have used both!
And Popfile's stats will fool you, believe me I know, I used Popfile.
Popfile uses only Bayesian, SpamPal uses a combination of effective spam fighting
techniques.
Hello Terry, you wrote:
And, at 99% + accuracy, Popfile makes it really easy for me to stick
to my principles. :)
This is always the main point that Popfile users stick too.
I too (although losing many good emails) was assured by Popfile itself that it
was doing such a
good job why it
Hello Paul, you wrote:
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work
LOL, yeaH right
I guess not all software is idiot-proof
--
John Morse
pagemaker -at- semo -dot- net
Current version is 1.62r | Using TBUDL information:
Hello MikeD, you wrote:
The problem with 'black lists' is that inevitably there are a lot of
people on them that should not be.
Did you know that you can un-check this feature from SpamPal if you do not wish to
use it?
--
John Morse
pagemaker -at- semo -dot- net
Hello John, you wrote:
well, I just got rid of spampal, not because it didn't work
LOL, yeaH right
I guess not all software is idiot-proof
whoops I thought you were saying that it didn't work.
I see you said not because it didn't work
My Appologies!
--
John Morse
pagemaker -at- semo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Morse, [JM] wrote:
JM whoops I thought you were saying that it didn't work.
JM I see you said not because it didn't work
JM My Appologies!
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
just to the person
On Sun, 29 Jun 2003, at 12:19:34 [GMT +0700] tbudl wrote:
TF On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:35:44 -0500 GMT (28/06/03, 22:35 +0700 GMT),
TF Greg Strong wrote:
I want to keep running dialog of all email correspondence. I think
having incorporated into the interface would make it more user
friendly.
Hello kristina,
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:46:53 +0100 GMT (30/06/03, 20:46 +0700 GMT),
kristina wrote:
I'm not sure if I'm understanding this correctly. But if I am then
TB! already does this (doesn't it)!
No. ;-)
I have one folder (well several actually) and all outgoing incoming
email go
I bcc: myself all the time. Doesn't everybody?
TF I used to. Namely when I was replying to private mails while I was in
TF the office; when I bcc'ed myself, I could download my replies at home
TF as well. I started this practice when I was still using Netscape Mail,
TF and that client has a
Hello Coyle306,
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 06:46:01 -0400 GMT (28/06/03, 17:46 +0700 GMT),
Coyle306 wrote:
TF In TB, I have to add the BCC macro to each template. I wish I
TF could activate such a feature on Account level, as I could in
TF Netscape.
TF Any seconders?
Nah. It's pretty easy to add it
Hello Thomas,
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, at 18:45:10 GMT +0700 (6/28/2003, 6:45 AM -0500 GMT
here), you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
But. If you use AB templates (which I do a lot), you have to add it to
every single template. Well, I did this when I set them up, but I
still thought it would be
On Fri 27-Jun-03 11:06pm -0400, Mark Wieder wrote:
BM I have AutoCompletion turned
BM off. I only occasionally use local delivery (I use Alt-N to get me
BM to the setting page, so Alt-NAenter toggles it) - and I often like
BM to edit the outbox for testing.
Maybe I'm being dense today (it's
Coyle306-
Thursday, June 26, 2003, 3:13:24 PM, you wrote:
snippage happens
C spammer had inserted _my address_, which _is_ in my address book.
Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of
why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the
correct
Hello Mark,
Thursday, June 26, 2003, 11:34:52 PM, you wrote:
MW Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of
MW why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the
MW correct filtering event would have occurred...
well I have to admit i send stuff to
group of the
AB - the handle is 'me' :-) I use it's templates for testing and
uncheck them to test the Family group templates.
I bet it's not that uncommon.
It's best, IMHO, to avoid the known filter. If one wants to check
for people in the address book - but not one's own address, one can
use
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:23am -0400, Dave Kennedy wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:54 PM, Bill wrote:
I don't like the Know filter at all and don't use it because of its
bugs on replying from Inbox-Known.
What bugs?
There's an inconvenience (no folder templates). The bugs are related.
(1
MW Of course, at this point I suppose I should bring up the question of
MW why your own address is in your address book? If it weren't then the
MW correct filtering event would have occurred...
I bcc: myself all the time. Doesn't everybody?
I appreciate the responses on this subject, and I
Bill-
I test-send myself stuff all the time, too, but I never considered
putting myself in the AB. Since I have local delivery turned on,
sending mail to my local accounts is instantaneous. Then I have some
external webmail accounts so I can see the kludges.
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63
On Fri 27-Jun-03 1:09pm -0400, Mark Wieder wrote:
I test-send myself stuff all the time, too, but I never considered
putting myself in the AB. Since I have local delivery turned on,
sending mail to my local accounts is instantaneous. Then I have some
external webmail accounts so I can see the
Hello Coyle306,
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 07:07:12 -0400 GMT (27/06/03, 18:07 +0700 GMT),
Coyle306 wrote:
I bcc: myself all the time. Doesn't everybody?
I used to. Namely when I was replying to private mails while I was in
the office; when I bcc'ed myself, I could download my replies at home
as
Bill-
Friday, June 27, 2003, 12:21:56 PM, you wrote:
BM We all work a little differently, Mark.
grin
BM I have AutoCompletion turned
BM off. I only occasionally use local delivery (I use Alt-N to get me
BM to the setting page, so Alt-NAenter toggles it) - and I often like
BM to edit the
I'm using 1.63 Beta 11 with Windows 98. I have the Known filter
activated, and I have it move knowns to a sub-folder of the Inbox,
Inbox\Known. Otherwise, they go to another sub-folder of the Inbox,
Inbox\Unknown. Worked great until I received a spam, in
Inbox\Known, from
Hello Coyle306,
Thursday, June 26, 2003, 6:07:42 AM, you wrote:
C All I could think of was that the spammer's sticking _my_ address in
C the Reply-To: and/or the X-RCPT-TO: somehow fooled the Known
C filter, since _my_ address was in my address book.
C Sure enough, when I deleted
MM Hmmm ... what should not work which way? It seems to me that if an
MM email is received with a 'from address' that is in your address
MM book it should be sent to the 'known' box. Just out of curiosity
MM ... what would you expect to work differently?
No. That's my point, it _wasn't_
On Thu 26-Jun-03 6:13pm -0400, Coyle306 wrote:
Quoting from the Sorting Office window: The Known filter allows you
to separate incoming mail by the presence of the _sender's address_ in
your address book (My emphasis)
Right - notice that it does not say From address - it says Sender
which
Hello TBUDL listers,
Since joining this list (only a couple of weeks
ago) I have learnt heaps, and my only regret is
not subscribing sooner..!
Also since joining I have learnt what the Known
folder is for... - before I wasn't really sure
so didn't investigate (more fool me!)
So I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kristina [K] wrote:'
K Since enabling the Known filter, everything does get filtered into
K the Known box, but it doesn't carry on, although I have ticked
K continue processing with other fil
Hello Allie,
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 at 06:19:52[GMT -0500](which was 11:19 where I
live) you wrote:
To get things working the way you wish, I suggest using the INBOX as
your Inbox-Known folder, deactivate the Inbox-Known filter, and
creating a new incoming filter with the following
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Richard Wakeford [RW] wrote:'
RW I've often wondered at the usefulness of the Known folder and,
RW noticing that you can only choose one folder to send messages to, I've
RW not been able to see
Hello Allie,
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 at 19:15:22[GMT -0500](which was 00:15 where I
live) you wrote:
As a part of spam filtering.
Ah, Spampal works a treat for me thanks.
I wonder about the usefulness of the filter myself. I guess it's a
means of making such a filtering method more
lter all my known mail. I then filter the
only the remaining mail for Spampal's spam header.
I started using SpamPal since most of my spam is now addressed
directly to me. This wasn't the case in the past where I could
safely assume that once a message was addressed direct
, it helps indentifying spam, it is the last filter. Anything
incoming that was not filtered into other folders by now, will be sent
to Known, and what remains in the Inbox is almost exclusively spam.
I am not hampered by any short-comings here. It is a simple and
straight-forward thing. What should I
Hello Wolffe,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 10:55:22 PM, you wrote:
W when I zapped mine, I cheated to get it back .. I created a new
W (dummy) account then copy and pasted the known from there to the
W old account. Then deleted the dummy account.
Yes, it works! Thanks a lot.
I did it other way
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, February 5, 2003, 4:43:11 PM, you wrote:
TF I am not sure, but I think you need to name it $Known$ (without
TF quotes).
It is not the solution :( Sad, but true.
Anyway thanks.
--
Best regards,
Artemichmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
When I created a new filer I somehow managed to rename Known filter.
Since then I can't rename it back to the original (or whatever you
like) name. Just clicking and typing a new name doesn't help.
Does anybody know how to rename this filter back?
Tanks in advance.
--
Artiom Koren
Hello Artemich,
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 12:58:53 +0100 GMT (05/02/03, 18:58 +0700 GMT),
Artemich wrote:
When I created a new filer I somehow managed to rename Known filter.
Since then I can't rename it back to the original (or whatever you
like) name. Just clicking and typing a new name doesn't
On Wednesday, February 05, 2003 Artemich stated:
A Hi,
A When I created a new filer I somehow managed to rename Known filter.
A Since then I can't rename it back to the original (or whatever you
A like) name. Just clicking and typing a new name doesn't help.
A Does anybody know how to rename
Apologies for asking a question that I know has been asked before (I
can't find the answer in my archives), but how do I *create* the index
known folder? I deleted it when the feature was first introduced, but
now I'd quite like to get it back.
Also, is it possible to modify the Known filter so
Hallo Tim,
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 17:17:28 +GMT (25-11-02, 18:17 +0100GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
TF how do I *create* the index known folder?
I suppose you mean 'Inbox - Known'
Create a new folder, call it $KNOWN$ and you're done.
TF Also, is it possible to modify the Known filter so
ON Monday, November 25, 2002, 6:17:28 PM, you wrote:
TF Apologies for asking a question that I know has been asked before (I
TF can't find the answer in my archives), but how do I *create* the index
TF known folder? I deleted it when the feature was first introduced, but
TF now I'd quite like
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Roelof Otten [RO] wrote:'
RO Nope! You can create a new filter that does the same as the
RO known-filter, but also plays a sound. When you're doing that,
RO you can disable the known-filter.
It's better to configure the folder to make its o
ON Monday, November 25, 2002, 7:04:56 PM, you wrote:
ACM The filter way will result in the sound being made for each message
ACM that matches the filter. With the folder configured to make the
ACM sound, the sound will be made only once, each time new messages are
ACM filtered to it.
Hi Allie,
nd being made for each message
ACM that matches the filter. With the folder configured to make the
ACM sound, the sound will be made only once, each time new messages are
ACM filtered to it.
Only problem here: you cannot enable sound on Inbox-Known.
So you'll have to create an extra Known folder an
I can't see how to add an address book to this. Nothing in the help file, couldn't
find anything in the archives useful.
I'm on version 1.61 at the moment, haven't used any betas for a while.
Thanks.
Doug
--
Doug's Archaeology Site http://www.ramtops.demon.co.uk
Hi Doug.
At 4:32 PM on Wednesday, October 02, 2002 you
[DW] wrote the following about ''Known'
Filter and adding address book':
DW I can't see how to add an address book to this. Nothing in the
DW help file, couldn't find anything in the archives useful.
DW I'm on version 1.61 at the moment
Hallo Doug,
On Wed, 02 Oct 2002 21:32:18 +0100GMT (2-10-02, 22:32 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
DW I can't see how to add an address book to this.
You can't add address books to the known filter. It only uses the
default AB.
I can remember discussions on this list why somebody might want
Hi Roelof,
Wednesday, October 2, 2002, 9:58:29 PM, you wrote:
Hallo Doug,
On Wed, 02 Oct 2002 21:32:18 +0100GMT (2-10-02, 22:32 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
DW I can't see how to add an address book to this.
You can't add address books to the known filter. It only uses
Hallo Doug,
On Wed, 2 Oct 2002 22:25:07 +0100GMT (2-10-02, 23:25 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
DW I can't see how to add an address book to this.
You can't add address books to the known filter. It only uses the
default AB.
DW They are all in one address book. The known filter has
Hello list
Probably a stupid question, but what is the purpose of the
Inbox-Known folder which was created automatically on
installation?
--
Best regards,
Andy
Current version is 1.61 | Using TBUDL
Sh'mae Andy,
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, at 23:52:31 [GMT +0100] (23:52 where I live) you wrote:
AM Hello list
AM Probably a stupid question, but what is the purpose of the
AM Inbox-Known folder which was created automatically on
AM installation?
There is a special filter that can
Date: 18 July 2002, Time: 22:23
Hi tbudl,
Can anyone remind me how to recreate the Known folder?
TIA
A
--
[ Adam Rykala ]
[ www.new-wales.net ]
[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
[ I thought I made a mistake once, but I was wrong.. ]
Current
Hello Adam,
On Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 11:23:46 PM you [AR] wrote (at least in
part):
AR Can anyone remind me how to recreate the Known folder?
Create a new folder and name it '$KNOWN$' (w/o single quotes).
--
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Date: 18 July 2002, Time: 22:47
Hi Peter, On Thu, 18 Jul 2002, at 23:39:56 [GMT +0200] (22:39 where I live) you wrote:
PP Hello Adam,
PP On Thursday, July 18, 2002 at 11:23:46 PM you [AR] wrote (at least in
PP part):
AR Can anyone remind me how to recreate the Known folder?
PP
On Monday, June 17, 2002, 18:21, Joseph N. wrote:
I cannot delete the filter. The folder's long gone, and the 'remove'
button in the Sorting Office is grayed out for the 'Known' filter.
Same here. I think I deleted it somewhere during the beta series,
haven't looked at it since. Sorry
a folder called unknown for all the spam... and to implement an easy,
customer-friendly way to customize it.
Which is the Inbox folder - if you use Known or filters to sort your
known associates' messages into other folders.
--
Dierk Haasis
http://www.Write4U.de
http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo
PGP
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named Inbox -
Known in each of my accounts, just above the Inbox standard folder.
What is this for? I can't find anything about it in the documentation.
--
Alan Little
Holotech Enterprises
On Friday, June 14, 2002, Alan Little wrote...
Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named Inbox -
Known in each of my accounts, just above the Inbox standard folder.
What is this for? I can't find anything about
Hey Alan,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 10:43:56 AM.
AL Using The Bat! v1.60q on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
AL I just upgraded to 1.60q, and it created a folder named Inbox -
AL Known in each of my accounts, just above
Hey Jonathan,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60c) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 11:16:22 AM.
JA As this question has been asked several times... might it not be a
JA nice addition to add to the FAQ (whoever maintains it?) ;)
Not a bad idea...
Marck?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Tim,
@14 June 2002, 11:20:14 -0400 (16:20 UK time) Tim Musson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JA As this question has been asked several times... might it not be a
JA nice addition to add to the FAQ (whoever maintains it?) ;)
TM [+] The Known incoming mail filter for moving messages from known
TM senders to a special folder so the Inbox can be left for unknown
TM senders and spam :-)
Well I've been trying to figure this out ever since it was implemented, seen
all kinds of people upset about this... It boggles
Hey Miles,
My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.53d) Personal
to write the following on Friday, June 14, 2002 at 3:03:31 PM.
TM [+] The Known incoming mail filter for moving messages from
TM known senders to a special folder so the Inbox can be left for
TM unknown senders and spam :-)
MJ Well
Hello Thomas!
On Wednesday, May 22, 2002 at 8:07:31 AM you wrote:
MSG and how I get rid of it if I don't want it?
Don't know.
For all those who couldn't follow the lists in the past few weeks -
and those that don't know what an archive is:
Got to your Sorting Office and disable the Known
Hello Michael,
On Tue, 21 May 2002 18:25:04 -0700 GMT (22/05/02, 08:25 +0700 GMT),
Michael S. Greenbaum wrote:
MSG Is this a problem on my computer or with the program?
It's not a problem, it's a new feature.
MSG Meanwhile, can anyone tell me what this Inbox-Known is, why I need it,
You can
101 - 200 of 286 matches
Mail list logo
