Re: more than just spam/ham classification

Hello TBUDL, on Sun, 15. Aug 2004 at 07:19:14 +0200 Alexander S. Kunz wrote: I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt. However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the bucket classification of PopFile (except for spam, of course). But you

Re: more than just spam/ham classification

Hello dAniel hAhler, 15-Aug-2004 11:55, you wrote: I thought you were using another Bayesian Filter, but you're using POPFile, too.. :) I'd vote for integrating something like POPfile into TB, of course. ;-) -- Best regards, Alexander Gumperson's Law: The probability of anything happening

more than just spam/ham classification (was: Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.)

Hello TBUDL, on Thu, 12. Aug 2004 at 22:54:24 +0200 Alexander S. Kunz wrote: Bayesfilter Bayesit! I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt. However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the bucket classification of PopFile (except for spam, of

Re: more than just spam/ham classification (was: Re: Bayes***** Plug-In.)

Hello dAniel hAhler, 15-Aug-2004 00:28, you wrote: I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt. However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the bucket classification of PopFile (except for spam, of course). But you cannot reflect real bucket