Hello JakeLM,
03-Sep-2004 20:03, you wrote:
>> I'd like to have working VFs in *my* version of the program...
> Any news or workaround about this problem ??
I am not really willing to test it on v3 ATM and go thru the hassle of
eventually rolling back to v2, and I doubt anyone else has filed a
On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:47:48 +0200, Alexander S. Kunz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to have working VFs in *my* version of the program...
Any news or workaround about this problem ??
I cant work without VF filters :((
We have to wait for a update ?
Thanks
--
JakeLM®
[ http://www.j
Hello Samson,
02-Sep-2004 07:59, you wrote:
> i know. but that seems to be a limitation of thebat and cannot be
> improved shortly (i guess they are all working on 3.0 and who cares
> this)
Well, I would. Apparently, the "NFS" is based on the filtering technique of
the VF's (at least it looks ve
> > so, avoid creating VFs with "filters". use "fast search" whenever
> > possible.
>
> Hmmm. Whats the use of VF's then? This would limit their usability quite a
> bit...
i know. but that seems to be a limitation of thebat and cannot be
improved shortly (i guess they are all working on 3.0 and
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 21:33:17 -0700, Samson
wrote:
so, avoid creating VFs with "filters". use "fast search" whenever
possible.
Hmmm. Whats the use of VF's then? This would limit their usability quite a
bit...
I beg pardon for sounding negative, but the topic "VFs" really annoys me
ATM.
--
> My guess is that it's the complexity of the virtual folders' filters.
> When I move a message to an ordinary folder, it takes a fraction of a
> second.
THIS IS IT!!
you figured it out.
that slow folder has 4000 messages, and 4 VFs associated with it (I
mean, 4 VFs use it as source folder).
w
S>> the freeze is about 10 sec on the P4 home PC, worse on the P3
S>> (15-20 sec).
S>> i have noticed this since thebat 2.12 (might be earlier, but 2.12 is
S>> the first version that i started to pay attention to this annoying
S>> thing), and still exists in latest lucky/6.
RO> Moving one message
Hallo Samson,
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 22:37:14 -0700GMT (31-8-2004, 7:37 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
S> the freeze is about 10 sec on the P4 home PC, worse on the P3 (15-20
S> sec).
S> i have noticed this since thebat 2.12 (might be earlier, but 2.12 is
S> the first version that i started to pa
> Search for *bat*.*tmp*, and delete them all.
thanks for the info.
which directory do they usually reside in? i tried both thebat dir and
temp dir, found nothing...
--
Samson, using Agent newsreader
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL'
> > Which TB version are you using, and which Windows version?
>
> 2 machines have the same issue (i sync mail back and forth between
> office and home everyday so both bats have the same folder structure
> and mails, and this freeze problem).
>
> one is office PC with Pentium 3 800MHZ and 512M,
> Which TB version are you using, and which Windows version?
2 machines have the same issue (i sync mail back and forth between
office and home everyday so both bats have the same folder structure
and mails, and this freeze problem).
one is office PC with Pentium 3 800MHZ and 512M, 60G UDMA100 HD
> What about memory usage by TB (and overall)?. Do you perhaps reach or get
> near RAM+Virtual total?
no. my machine has 1G mem (yes, i'm a software developer so i need a
monster to work for me). by the time thebat is freezing, i don't see a
significant increment of memory usage. the available mem
Hello Thomas,
M>> What's wrong about using Task Manager?
>
> Where do I find this in Win98?
I don't know, I never used Win98. I went from Win95 to NT4 and then to
W2K.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.13 "Lucky" Beta/8
__
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
28-Aug-2004 18:40, you wrote:
> I have 512MB RAM, don't know why it says 523MB
In the computer world, a factor of 1024 is/was common. In the real world :)
however, 1000 always is and was the factor for kilo, mega, giga, etc.
But its not consistently used... when you read
Hello Thomas,
> Running in the background are MPower 1.2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.08, Kerio PF 4,
> and PC-Cillin 6 without realtime scan. I have 512MB RAM, don't know
> why it says 523MB. Any known issues with MPower 1.2?
I have no idea of what MPower or [EMAIL PROTECTED] are for or what they do. I
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, August 29, 2004, 3:11:06 AM, you wrote:
I also get same problem. I have a folder which contain 11000+ messages. I've compress
it. When I move some(about 10+) mails to that folder, TB would freeze 40 sec, occupy
100% cpu and consume 53M RAM and 56M VM.
My machine is AMD XP
Hello Chris,
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 14:05:57 -0400 GMT (29/08/2004, 01:05 +0700 GMT),
Chris wrote:
C> Try turning [EMAIL PROTECTED] off and see if you can move messages faster.
I just turned it off, but that didn't help.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
"Politics is the ability to foretell what is going to h
Alexander S. Kunz @ 2004-Aug-28 1:39:48 PM
"move a mail to another folder - takes 10+ seconds?" <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.08
> Wasn't this mentioned on the list before to cause problems?
Yes, it was. When it is running, even at the lowest priori
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
28-Aug-2004 18:40, you wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3.08
Wasn't this mentioned on the list before to cause problems?
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
The errors to avoid are those that eliminate opportunities to try again. --
Lazar Go
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:51:39 +0200 GMT (28/08/2004, 16:51 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
>> I also have noted that CPU usage goes up to 100% during the freeze,
M> What about memory usage by TB (and overall)?. Do you perhaps reach or get
M> near RAM+Virtual total?
No, free memory stays in the
Hi Samson,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, at 01:17:29 [GMT-0700] (which was 18:17:29 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
> when a folder has about 2000 mail, draging and drop a mail from inbox
> into this folder will take 10+ seconds to finish, and the UI is not
> responsive during this period.
Have y
Hello Thomas,
> I also have noted that CPU usage goes up to 100% during the freeze,
What about memory usage by TB (and overall)?. Do you perhaps reach or get
near RAM+Virtual total?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.13 "Lucky" Beta/7
_
Hello Samson,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:52:11 -0700 GMT (28/08/2004, 08:52 +0700 GMT),
Samson wrote:
S> I always have as less apps as possible running at the same time. My
S> CPU usage is pretty low in most cases (except when thebat is doing
S> that 10-sec movement, when the CPU utilization goes up
> Sounds a tad slow.
> What else is running.
> When did you do your latest purge & compress for both folders.
> When did you do your latest defrag of your drive.
Thanks for your hints.
I always have as less apps as possible running at the same time. My
CPU usage is pretty low in most cases (excep
Dear Samson,
@27-Aug-2004, 01:17 -0700 (27-Aug 09:17 UK time) Samson said:
> when a folder has about 2000 mail, draging and drop a mail from inbox
> into this folder will take 10+ seconds to finish,
...
> shouldn't thebat be a little faster in this case?
Yes. Although virtual folders do represe
Hallo Samson,
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:17:29 -0700GMT (27-8-2004, 10:17 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
S> when a folder has about 2000 mail, draging and drop a mail from inbox
S> into this folder will take 10+ seconds to finish, and the UI is not
S> responsive during this period.
Sounds a tad sl
when a folder has about 2000 mail, draging and drop a mail from inbox
into this folder will take 10+ seconds to finish, and the UI is not
responsive during this period.
the machine is a P3-800 with 512MB memory and a 40G 5400rpm drive. not
a top grade PC but is very common for an office use.
shou
27 matches
Mail list logo
