Re[2]: New Participant

2004-05-22 Thread Marc Lewis
Hello All, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 2:36:32 PM, Peter Meyns wrote: PM> gpg: Good signature from "Marc Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" PM> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! PM> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. PM> Primary key f

Re[2]: New Participant

2004-05-22 Thread Marc Lewis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 2:39:24 PM, Mark Partous wrote: MP> See the URL at the bottom of this message... No URL there. (?) MP> Had a BBS (PCBoard) for years. Ahh, yes, some of my good friends still run PCB. MP> I don't know if there a

Re[2]: New Participant

2004-05-22 Thread Marc Lewis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 2:56:56 PM, Sean Rima wrote: SR> Hi Marc, wonder where I know you from :) Where could it be?! Great to run into you here, Sean. Earlier on I wrote a message about PGP; I just installed v6.5.8. I note that when

Re[3]: GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Marc Lewis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 8:43:33 PM, Michael L. Wilson wrote: MLW> OK, I am dumpinh gpg and going with the free version of 8. I am MLW> running XP, and they say 8 is the only version that works with XP. I MLW> know that 6 is as good, d

Re[2]: GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Michael L. Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Allie, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:51:25 PM, you wrote: AM> Michael L. Wilson, [MLW] wrote: MLW>> OK, I am dumpinh gpg and going with the free version of 8. I am MLW>> running XP, and they say 8 is the only version that works with XP. I MLW>

Re: GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Allie Martin
Michael L. Wilson, [MLW] wrote: MLW> OK, I am dumpinh gpg and going with the free version of 8. I am MLW> running XP, and they say 8 is the only version that works with XP. I MLW> know that 6 is as good, does not use services and uses lest memory, MLW> so I am going to try 6.5 also and see w

Re[2]: GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Michael L. Wilson
Hello Allie, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:40:19 PM, you wrote: AM> Michael L. Wilson, [MLW] wrote: AM>>> There a couple annoying limitations though. If you use a single key AM>>> and don't use multiple identities, sender , then you AM>>> shouldn't have any problems with these limitations. MLW>> Al

Re[2]: GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Michael L. Wilson
Hello Allie, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:39:37 PM, you wrote: AM> PGP 6 to 8 integration is the most straightforward though. I have less AM> problems when using it especially when it comes to encrypting and AM> decrypting. OK, I am dumpinh gpg and going with the free version of 8. I am running

Re: GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Allie Martin
Michael L. Wilson, [MLW] wrote: AM>> There a couple annoying limitations though. If you use a single key AM>> and don't use multiple identities, sender , then you AM>> shouldn't have any problems with these limitations. MLW> Also, I cannot verify your signature with gpg. Any ideas? What happens

Re: Navigation Frustration

2004-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello Stuart, M>> I'll try to make some test tonight. > Did you discover anything? Yes, that you were right. If there is at least one unread message in a folder it will not jump to the next. I had not really noticed that before because I am quite mouse oriented and because, with my setup, I basic

Re: GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Allie Martin
Michael L. Wilson, [MLW] wrote: MLW> So, just for signing messages, what is the best path right now. I MLW> have 9 email addresses. Is PGP 6 or 8 or GNUPG the best from MLW> simplicity and integration GnuPG's integration is a finicky with the key matching, while the PGP integration will simply

Re[2]: GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Michael L. Wilson
Hello Allie, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:27:34 PM, you wrote: AM> There a couple annoying limitations though. If you use a single key AM> and don't use multiple identities, sender , then you AM> shouldn't have any problems with these limitations. Also, I cannot verify your signature with gpg.

Re[2]: GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Michael L. Wilson
Hello Allie, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 6:27:34 PM, you wrote: AM> There a couple annoying limitations though. If you use a single key AM> and don't use multiple identities, sender , then you AM> shouldn't have any problems with these limitations. So, just for signing messages, what is the best pat

Re: GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Allie Martin
Michael L. Wilson, [MLW] wrote: MLW> I have installed GNUPG and got it working. I have also installed MLW> GPGshell and it works by itself. Is there any way to make the MLW> menu option in The Bat! open the GPGKeys? Currently it does MLW> nothing when clicked. TB!'s integration is with GnuPG and

GPGshell

2004-05-22 Thread Michael L. Wilson
Hello TBUDL, I have installed GNUPG and got it working. I have also installed GPGshell and it works by itself. Is there any way to make the menu option in The Bat! open the GPGKeys? Currently it does nothing when clicked. It does sign messages, have not tested verifying yet. -- Bes

Re: Highlight emails and send a quick note to all

2004-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello Marten, > Yes - just the same note to each address - no quoting necessary, no > attachments. > ... > Same subject (new one) is fine. > ... > Preferably from any folder. > ... > Mainly account templates and folder templates although for TBUDL I > have had to set up an adres book template. >

Re[2]: All read messages in Inbox gone

2004-05-22 Thread Stan Robins
On Saturday, May 22, 2004, at 10:06:36 AM, I received a message, mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], in which you wrote: (Text not relevant to my reply may have been snipped.) > It may have been a glitch that happened when you upgraded. However, it > is confusing that the same happened on your daughter's com

Re: New Participant

2004-05-22 Thread Sean Rima
Marc Lewis wrote: Hello All, I am a new user of 'The Bat!' (personal) and new to this list. Are there conference/forum rules posted that I should read? Hi Marc, wonder where I know you from :) Sean -- GPG Key Id 120A02FB ICQ: 679813 linuxcounter: #231986 BBS telnet://t

Re[2]: New Participant

2004-05-22 Thread Marc Lewis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 2:37:00 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: ML>> I am a new user of 'The Bat!' (personal) and new to this list. RO> Welcome. ML>> Are there conference/forum rules posted that I should read? RO> you should have received the wel

Re: New Participant

2004-05-22 Thread Mark Partous
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marc, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 9:19:49 PM, you wrote: ML> I am a new user of 'The Bat!' (personal) and new to this list. Are ML> there conference/forum rules posted that I should read? Welcome! See the URL at the bottom of this message... H

Re: New Participant

2004-05-22 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Marc, gpg: Signature made 05/22/04 21:20:01 (MEZ) - Mitteleurop. Sommerzei using DSA key ID F5120D57 gpg: Good signature from "Marc Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to th

Re: New Participant

2004-05-22 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Marc, @22-May-2004, 14:19 -0500 (22-May 20:19 UK time) Marc Lewis [ML] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to BatList: ML> I am a new user of 'The Bat!' (personal) and new to this list. Welcome! ML> Are there conference/forum rules posted that I should read? You should have received them from t

Re: New Participant

2004-05-22 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Marc, On Sat, 22 May 2004 14:19:49 -0500GMT (22-5-04, 21:19 +0200, where I live), you wrote: ML> I am a new user of 'The Bat!' (personal) and new to this list. Welcome. ML> Are there conference/forum rules posted that I should read? If everything is as our lords and masters tell us, you

New Participant

2004-05-22 Thread Marc Lewis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello All, I am a new user of 'The Bat!' (personal) and new to this list. Are there conference/forum rules posted that I should read? Thanks in advance! - -- * * Best regards, * Marc. * New Orleans, LA (US

Re: multi-language templates

2004-05-22 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo MAU, On Sat, 22 May 2004 20:41:11 +0200GMT (22-5-04, 20:41 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C>>> - Reply / Forward templates: according to the language used in the C>>> original message. >> Forget about that. That's impossible. Without too much trouble I can M> POPFile works a treat if you

Re: multi-language templates

2004-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello Roelof, C>> - Reply / Forward templates: according to the language used in the C>> original message. > > Forget about that. That's impossible. Without too much trouble I can > device a message (that won't make any sense, but that isn't the point) > that includes twenty words that can be fou

Re: Spam Filtering

2004-05-22 Thread Andrew
Hello Gene, Friday, May 21, 2004, 6:53:29 AM, you wrote: GB> BayesIT had been working pretty well is it the best spam plugin available? -- Best regards, Andrew Current version is 2.10.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information

Re: multi-language templates

2004-05-22 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Cyrille, On Sat, 22 May 2004 18:08:26 +0200GMT (22-5-04, 18:08 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C> I am thinking about making TB my default mail client. Good choice. C> My situation: I have to handle mail in 6 European languages and (at C> least) 3 different charsets. That should offer n

Re: multi-language templates

2004-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello Cyrille, I forgot to say a couple of things in my previous message. Talking about using AB or Groups templates, you can create in you AB a groups for each language and then, when you include someone new in your AB assign him/her to the appropriate group. The main reason I use the help of P

Re: multi-language templates

2004-05-22 Thread MAU
Hello Cyrille, > Is this possible? If yes, how? > > Important: I don't want different folders for different languages. My > folders are organized by topic. > > Does somebody out there has some other hints what could be helpful in > dealing with mail in multiple languages? It is possible to a ce

multi-language templates

2004-05-22 Thread Cyrille
Hello , I am thinking about making TB my default mail client. But I am not yet convinced. My decision depends on whether I find a solution for the following problem: My situation: I have to handle mail in 6 European languages and (at least) 3 different charsets. My question: I would like TB to c

Re[2]: filtering problem

2004-05-22 Thread Vijay
Thanks Martin, The filter u suggested worked perfectly!! thanks Hello Martin, Saturday, May 22, 2004, 9:07:26 AM, you wrote: MW> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MW> Hash: SHA1 MW> Hello Vijay, MW> On 22 May 2004, 08:41 -0500 (14:41 local time) Vijay [V] in MW> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: All read messages in Inbox gone

2004-05-22 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Stan, On Sat, 22 May 2004 09:45:47 -0500 GMT (22/05/2004, 21:45 +0700 GMT), Stan Robins wrote: SR> Each time messages have disappeared, the Inbox had been set to purge SR> and compress. I turned that off after we started exchanging messages SR> here. Since turning off the purge and compress

Re[2]: All read messages in Inbox gone

2004-05-22 Thread Stan Robins
Hello Thomas, On Saturday, May 22, 2004, at 12:22:15 AM, I received a message, mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], in which you wrote: (Text not relevant to my reply may have been snipped.) > On Fri, 21 May 2004 12:10:04 -0500 GMT (22/05/2004, 00:10 +0700 GMT), > Stan Robins wrote: SR>> These were messages

Re: filtering problem

2004-05-22 Thread Martin Webster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Vijay, On 22 May 2004, 08:41 -0500 (14:41 local time) Vijay [V] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: V> I am receiving a mailing list from PGP users and the "TO: address is V> [EMAIL PROTECTED], and i used this as the filtering string, V> location:

Re: Computer frozen for 45 sec when launching The Bat 2.10

2004-05-22 Thread Allie Martin
Wilwilwil, [W] wrote: W> I have installed the Bat 2.10 and I have a problem. Each time I W> launch the Bat, My computer is frozen for 45 or 60 sec and I can't W> do anything with it. No mouse, no keyboard, just have to wait ! W> What's wrong ? Could be any of a number of things. From the TB! si

filtering problem

2004-05-22 Thread Vijay
Hello, I am receiving a mailing list from PGP users and the "TO: address is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and i used this as the filtering string, location: recepient, but the filter does not seem to work. any help is appreciated -- Best regards, Vijay mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Problem with the %CLEAR macro

2004-05-22 Thread Miguel A. Urech
Hello all, I posted this same message a few days ago in TBTech but I haven't had any reply yet. So, I'm going to try here to see if I have better luck. -- Original message -- Let me start by saying that I have looked in the archives and wasn't able to find anything. I am working on two

Re: Mod: Cut mark (was: Font in Address Book)

2004-05-22 Thread Paul Cartwright
On Friday, May 21, 2004, 8:44 PM, you wrote: LG>> You really should put your sig delimiter either right above, or right LG>> below your name.. Otherwise people will be forced to cut out all the LG>> extraneous stuff under your name each time. LG>> PB> Thanks, Lief. Fixed. it's Leif , Paul!

Computer frozen for 45 sec when launching The Bat 2.10

2004-05-22 Thread WilWilWil
Hello, I have installed the Bat 2.10 and I have a problem. Each time I launch the Bat, My computer is frozen for 45 or 60 sec and I can't do anything with it. No mouse, no keyboard, just have to wait ! What's wrong ? Current version is 2.10.03

Re[2]: HTML Links

2004-05-22 Thread John Cunnane
Hi Robin, raoca> This didn't occur, but because you didn't send your message as HTML. I raoca> have experienced it often, that a message written in HTML and containing raoca> the & character (coded as & in the HTML) loses this in the reply. In raoca> general TB! is not good at quoting text that wa