Re: [Wish] Automatic (was: ...), if subject line of reply is edited.
[Reply to: »Volker Ahrendt« · 2008-02-05 · 23:47 h (CET)]
Moin, folks!
Could there be a implementation, which does this like here:
Re: BETA (was: Re: 4.0.0.19)
That's WRONG! If it would ever be implemented, it should be
Re: BETA (was: 4.0.0.19)
Good idea! - My favorite news client (40tude Dialog) does so, too:
If you edit the subject line of a reply the client sets the original
subject in brackets like above.
I found a (quite good) solution for this problem:
a) Semiautomatic
- Create a Quicktemplate and (out of convenience) assign a shortcut:
%If:%Subj%OSubj:%Subject='Re: %Subj (was: %OSubj)':%Subj
- Reply to a message and edit the Subject line
- Hit Shortcut
- Be happy! :-)
b) Automatic
- Include the macros in your reply template:
%If:%Subj%OSubj:%Subject='Re: %Subj (was: %OSubj)':%Subj
- Reply to a message and edit the Subject line
- Be happy! :-)
Pro solution a):
You can run the QT at any time even if the textbody of the new message
is already modified.
Pro solution b):
The macros run really automatically! :-) But there are two
limitations:
1. The template must not contain the macro: %ModifyOnce(Subject)
2. The textbody must *not* be modified *before* you change the subject
line.
Maybe some of you like this solution, too. ;-)
Cheers!
VA
P.S.: Message is crossposted to: TBUDL Mailing List
- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
Using /\^o^/\! 4.2.9.1 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3.
»There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly
what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly vanish
and be replaced by something even more bizarre and incomprehensible.
There is another theory which states that this has already happened …«
Douglas Adams ('52 - '01), »The Restaurant at the End of the Universe«
Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
Hi On Tuesday 21 July 2009 at 2:45:57 AM, in mid:864192924.20090721084...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez wrote: . It's Leif's site, and I think he doesn't read this list any more. I'll contact him by PM. Looks like Leif's attended to it. I just logged on without any issues. The latest ZIP file is still dated April, so nobody has successfully added or updated since it was back working. -- Best regards, MFPA Confusion is always the most honest response Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: [Wish] Automatic (was: ...), if subject line of reply is edited.
Hi On Thursday 30 July 2009 at 3:12:49 PM, in mid:1682819829.20090730161...@ahrendt.net, Volker Ahrendt wrote: [Reply to: »Volker Ahrendt« · 2008-02-05 · 23:47 h (CET)] Moin, folks! Could there be a implementation, which does this like here: Re: BETA (was: Re: 4.0.0.19) That's WRONG! If it would ever be implemented, it should be Re: BETA (was: 4.0.0.19) No! Should be - BETA (was: Re: 4.0.0.19) Good idea! - My favorite news client (40tude Dialog) does so, too: If you edit the subject line of a reply the client sets the original subject in brackets like above. I do it so rarely that I never encountered this feature when I used 40tude Dialog. I found a (quite good) solution for this problem: a) Semiautomatic - Create a Quicktemplate and (out of convenience) assign a shortcut: [...] b) Automatic - Include the macros in your reply template: [...] Pro solution a): You can run the QT at any time even if the textbody of the new message is already modified. It would take me longer to look at the QT to remind myself of the shortcut than to type three letters, a colon and two brackets! (-; Pro solution b): The macros run really automatically! :-) But there are two limitations: 1. The template must not contain the macro: %ModifyOnce(Subject) I don't imagine that is too onerous. 2. The textbody must *not* be modified *before* you change the subject line. That would probably kill it for me - unless the thread was already not related to the subject line, I would only decide to change it if my contribution took it in a different direction. I would decide this was the case after reading what I had typed... Maybe some of you like this solution, too. ;-) Cheers! VA P.S.: Message is crossposted to: TBUDL Mailing List -- Best regards, MFPA Change is inevitable except from a vending machine Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
Hello MFPA, On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:11:53 +0100 GMT (30/Jul/09, 22:11 PM +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: It's Leif's site, and I think he doesn't read this list any more. I'll contact him by PM. M Looks like Leif's attended to it. I just logged on without any issues. M M The latest ZIP file is still dated April, so nobody has successfully M added or updated since it was back working. Nobody knew until now that it is working again. Thanks for the update! -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.9.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
'Ello MFPA, On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:11:53 +0100 (your time) you said: Looks like Leif's attended to it. I just logged on without any issues. Can't login from here. Same as usual, just sits there and does nothing. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #22688. Ods Grow Wee Inh? ¶ Auxiliary Information: • The Bat! Pro 4.2.9.1 • Windows XP Pro 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 • Scanned by avast! Plugin 4.8.1335 DB 090729-1 (29.07.2009) Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
Hello Simon, S 'Ello MFPA, S On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:11:53 +0100 (your time) you said: Looks like Leif's attended to it. I just logged on without any issues. S Can't login from here. Same as usual, just sits there and does nothing. Just FYI Simon, I was able to successfully log on also. Wish I could suggest something for you to check. -- Jack LaRosa mailto:jlar...@charter.net Sticking with with The Bat! ver: 3.99.3 for now. Operating? with Windows XP Pro ver 5 build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi On Thursday 30 July 2009 at 4:56:27 PM, in mid:19110075850.20090730225...@thomas-bkk.my-fqdn.de, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hello MFPA, On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:11:53 +0100 GMT (30/Jul/09, 22:11 PM +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: It's Leif's site, and I think he doesn't read this list any more. I'll contact him by PM. M Looks like Leif's attended to it. I just logged on M without any issues. M The latest ZIP file is still dated April, so nobody M has successfully added or updated since it was back M working. Nobody knew until now that it is working again. Thanks for the update! Oops! It now seems to have stopped again... - -- Best regards, MFPA Look, it's a hat! It's not going to hurt you. Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQCVAwUBSnHeBqipC46tDG5pAQhoaQP+JgDVoDxbodgdeTVq1Qdu+pV+xzk+qGz6 BkcLvm9TYQtZZzZj/VkvEIkYSr4eI/Kg8dYwspE+F+8QcwDYT4AVz9WqP1AfuO/d KzHQI/Tt/NPOc+wa/OHytWsFCARwRkidfB1DRfd5cRtRP8bxJHpKKRdHwSHD/Fhd DEWfMNm/iLY= =yCx7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
Guten Tag MFPA, am Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2009 um 17:11 schrieben Sie: Looks like Leif's attended to it. I just logged on without any issues. I tried to log in and (maybe) destroyed it again... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:je...@gmx.de The Bat! 4.2.9.4 + AntiSpamSniper 3.2.1.1 + Gaijin XMP Makro Plugin 1.2 Language-File-Checksum: F49817DD Windows XP 5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 2 AMD Athlon Dual Core 4850e 2,50 GHz, 4 GB RAM Debian Lenny + Windows XP @VirtualBox 3.0.2 r49928 non-OSE 8 POP3 Accounts - 1 IMAP - 170 (Common) Folders Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi On Thursday 30 July 2009 at 7:17:47 PM, in mid:32728012.20090730201...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote: I tried to log in and (maybe) destroyed it again... Yes, I found it working earlier and logged on a couple of times but it's having none of it now )-; - -- Best regards, MFPA Puns are bad but poetry is verse. Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQCVAwUBSnHmG6ipC46tDG5pAQjgOAP/SnM2ldQOKWS7Aio/EOH+ZYFqLapcF/lm kxeP+a/PHIJsnqdsHjRxTCkE5V9xivfdOHEAVXad3PdU3gJEnS8ly3y9OSAsgu0b 66yBVbMkdi7c3EEgRmW601ceqQvvznaS2cdaoYW2fWEIZVtkxVPngIUNw03WgRvr jnzYDuQdZ9A= =rYOA -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi On Thursday 30 July 2009 at 7:17:47 PM, in mid:32728012.20090730201...@gmx.de, Jens Franik wrote: I tried to log in and (maybe) destroyed it again... Yes, I found it working earlier and logged on a couple of times but it's having none of it now )-; Would there be wisdom in hosting this feature somewhere else or deleting it from the code? -- Rick Rogues are preferable to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest. - Alexandre Dumas v4.2.9.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
'Ello Rick, On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:02:56 -0400 (your time) you said: Would there be wisdom in hosting this feature somewhere else or deleting it from the code? Totally agree, one or the other. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) # 1520. Wow Hinges Oder? ¶ Auxiliary Information: • The Bat! Pro 4.2.9.1 • Windows XP Pro 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 • Scanned by avast! Plugin 4.8.1335 DB 090729-1 (29.07.2009) Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
GnuPG - where do my keys need to be?
Hello I've installed GnuPG and GnuPG Shell as the front-end but I cannot get it to work with TB. I've created my keys which I can see in the key manager, but when I try to sign/encrypt an email I get a no secret key found message (or words to that effect). When I created the keys they defaulted to Documents and Settings\username\application date\gnupg - I pointed TB to that directory but it makes no difference. Can someone give me a walk through with this? I'm not new to PGP/GnuPG so I should be able to do this - it's driving me nuts! -- Carren Using The Bat! v4.2.9.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: GnuPG - where do my keys need to be?
'Ello Carren, On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:30:50 +1200 (your time) you said: I've installed GnuPG and GnuPG Shell as the front-end This isn't going to help you, but I tried to install it to take a look but I'm afraid the GnuPG Shell installer doesn't find my GnuPG folder, even though there's an entry for it in the registry. Tried all sorts but no joy, so sorry, can't help you. If you're interested, the best (only IMO of course) Windows front end for GnuPG and the one I use is Windows Privacy Tray v 1.41. http://wald.intevation.org/frs/?group_id=14 If you've already tried WinPT and didn't like it sorry for suggesting it again. I found it to be the best of a very limited number. Easy to use and you can manually set paths to gpg.exe and your keys as well. Having been a PGP user for years and years this was the only combo I could stick with. -- Simon (Privateofcourse) #14221. Hi Ergo Own Dews? ¶ Auxiliary Information: • The Bat! Pro 4.2.9.1 • Windows XP Pro 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 • Scanned by avast! Plugin 4.8.1335 DB 090730-0 (30.07.2009) Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: GnuPG - where do my keys need to be?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Thursday, July 30, 2009, 7:56:06 PM, Simon wrote in part: I've installed GnuPG and GnuPG Shell as the front-end S This isn't going to help you, but I tried to install it to take a look but S I'm afraid the GnuPG Shell installer doesn't find my GnuPG folder, even S though there's an entry for it in the registry. Tried all sorts but no joy, S so sorry, can't help you. S If you're interested, the best (only IMO of course) Windows front end for S GnuPG and the one I use is Windows Privacy Tray v 1.41. S http://wald.intevation.org/frs/?group_id=14 S If you've already tried WinPT and didn't like it sorry for suggesting it S again. I found it to be the best of a very limited number. Easy to use and S you can manually set paths to gpg.exe and your keys as well. I agree fully. S Having been a PGP user for years and years this was the only combo I could S stick with. Again ... same here. - -- Ron. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) - WinPT 1.3.2 Charset: UTF-8 Comment: Public key: http://pankfloyd.com/ iEYEAREIAAYFAkpyOF8ACgkQkdRzYGD7pIUZkACgtajPaMpC7w5+cTqHap7sP0+Z 2o4AoNw+s0Xc371kRnJU1AknuqAkY/og =um/g -END PGP SIGNATURE- Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: GnuPG - where do my keys need to be?
Hello Simon, Friday, July 31, 2009, 11:56:06 AM, you wrote: Simon On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:30:50 +1200 (your time) you said: I've installed GnuPG and GnuPG Shell as the front-end Simon If you're interested, the best (only IMO of course) Windows front end for Simon GnuPG and the one I use is Windows Privacy Tray v 1.41. Well I'm glad it wasn't just me who couldn't get GnuPG Shell to work. I've un-installed it and started fresh with WinPT, but I'm having a similar problem. As I said, my keys were saved by default (when I installed GnuPG) to Documents and Settings\username\application date\gnupg - and again, I have pointed to that via OpenPGP - Preferences- Files, but I'm still getting the secret key not found message. I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. I've used PGP/GnuPG for years under both Windows and Linux and I've never had this much trouble getting it to work before. I must be getting too old for this ;) -- Carren Using The Bat! v4.2.9.1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
Hi On Thursday 30 July 2009 at 8:19:06 PM, in mid:205018390.20090730201...@privateofcourse.co.uk, Simon wrote: 'Ello Rick, On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:02:56 -0400 (your time) you said: Would there be wisdom in hosting this feature somewhere else or deleting it from the code? Totally agree, one or the other. Not deleting but maybe a hostimg solutipm. -- Best regards, MFPA Editing is a rewording activity Using The Bat! v4.0.38 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
Hello MFPA, On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:53:39 +0100 GMT (31/Jul/09, 0:53 AM +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: M Looks like Leif's attended to it. I just logged on M without any issues. M The latest ZIP file is still dated April, so nobody M has successfully added or updated since it was back M working. Nobody knew until now that it is working again. Thanks for the update! M Oops! It now seems to have stopped again... I'm checking with Leif. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.9.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
Hello MFPA, On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 02:32:09 +0100 GMT (31/Jul/09, 8:32 AM +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: Would there be wisdom in hosting this feature somewhere else or deleting it from the code? Totally agree, one or the other. M Not deleting but maybe a hostimg solutipm. Hosting and, especially, maintaining. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.9.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: www.pcwize.com/thebat/
Hello Rick, On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:02:56 -0400 GMT (31/Jul/09, 2:02 AM +0700 GMT), Rick wrote: Yes, I found it working earlier and logged on a couple of times but it's having none of it now )-; R Would there be wisdom in hosting this feature somewhere else or R deleting it from the code? Would anybody be willing to take it over? I am sure Leif will have no problem with that. -- Cheers, Thomas. http://thomas.fernandez.hat-gar-keine-homepage.de/ Message reply created with The Bat! 4.2.9.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current version is 4.2.9.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
