On 18 November 1999 at 08:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
R Can somebody give me the correct macro (and an example) for using
R an external cookie-file? I thought it existed, but never found the
R macro... in a previous mail, it got mentioned so it's existence has
R been confirmed :-)
Hi all,
Watcher wrote:
I have a few questions, first here is my template for new messages
for the
"thebat" list:
___ Template begin _
%SIGNCOMPLETE
%TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
%Cursor
- --
Watcher aka Bill DeVos |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
This template has 2 problems, one is that the cursor is in the to
field instead of at the %Cursor position,
J This is normal for new messages...
Funny, what is the %Cursor command for, then?
When you 'tab' your way down from the To: field to the
Hi all,
Jast wrote:
Funny, what is the %Cursor command for, then?
Well, if you tab in the message, you get put to that place of course.
It is just expected that you enter the address first thing.
If you create a new message from the address book, the cursor is
*still* placed in the
Hi all,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I motion to change that. I don't need a cursor command if I have to
hit TAB three or four times, or use the mouse anyway. The cursor
should go were the %Cursor command says it should start.
Does anybody second the motion, so we can put it on the
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Marck,
MP %COOKIE="d:\pathspec\cookiefile.txt"
Is it possible that this macro can't handle long filenames?
--
Der Immer Jodelende Schweizer
On Thursday, November 18, 1999, 3:25:58 AM, Jast wrote:
This template has 2 problems, one is that the cursor is in the to
field instead of at the %Cursor position,
This is normal for new messages...
Problem is it's also normal when creating a message by clicking on an
e-mail address. Why
Wednesday, November 17, 1999, 10:11:31 PM, Thomas wrote:
Does anybody second the motion, so we can put it on the (mysterious, as
never seen or published) wish-list?
No. Because it works as expected. Quite frankly, I just shook my head
and sighed when I saw your initial message because,
Thursday, November 18, 1999, 1:55:20 AM, Ali wrote:
If you create a new message from the address book, the cursor is
*still* placed in the 'To:' field initially. H.
Of course. That is to remain consistent with the behavior otherwise.
Even if it is filled out people operate on memory
I'm sure I'll feel stupid about this, but is there a way to change
the account default column settings. I've looked around but all I
can find is where to change the column settings for an individual
folder.
*grin* You're going to love this... I only discovered it by accident:
right
Hi all,
Nancy wrote:
I'm sure I'll feel stupid about this, but is there a way to change
the account default column settings. I've looked around but all I
can find is where to change the column settings for an individual
folder.
Please don't feel stupid to ask anything. That's
Hi all,
Steve Lamb wrote:
I promised that I wouldn't reply but I couldn't resist. :
snip
Then think, Ali, don't just jump on the bandwagon for a ride and
disengage your brain. Tell me, are *all* of the addresses you've
ever used in the addressbook? You've never added one by hand
Thursday, November 18, 1999, 9:03:43 AM, Ali wrote:
Well, assuming that I haven't finished addressing when creating a
message with the address book seems quite the more unlikely assumption
to make.
No, it isn't an assumption. In creating a message there are several
steps. In every other
Hi all,
Steve Lamb wrote:
No, it isn't an assumption. In creating a message there are several
steps. In every other case the UI places you into the header section
of the creation process before the body of the message with one
exception, replies. Personally, I think it should there as
Hello Steve,
Your message from Thursday, November 18, 1999, 17:22 : "(No Subject)"
SL Thursday, November 18, 1999, 7:56:24 AM, Ali wrote:
Steve, please don't call peoples suggestions idiotic especially when
it's not necessary.
SL It was. An understanding of basic UI at the level of
Thursday, November 18, 1999, 1:20:55 PM, Bernhard wrote:
People like Steve Lamb make it so hard for beginners to stay in this list.
Beginners shouldn't really be making suggestions. Furthermore everyone is
a beginner exactly once. I don't like things that are geared for beginners at
the
Hello all fellow TBUDL members,
I need a PGP source that's not in the USA, since I'm not there myself
and the silly export technology law there exists. There must be plenty
of European (for instance) sources I'd appreciated being pointed to
one, given that most TBUDL members are also not in
Hi all,
Steve Lamb wrote:
No, it is the point. People should learn to use the program, not the
program to babysit the user.
So you consider it babysitting. H. Oh boy. :)
Do you have statistics to prove *your* point. It was you who
introduced proving. :)
Uhm, you're the one on the
On Thursday, November 18, 1999, 22:38, Douglas Hinds wrote:
I need a PGP source that's not in the USA, since I'm not there
myself and the silly export technology law there exists. There must
be plenty of European (for instance) sources I'd appreciated being
pointed to one, given that most
Hi Douglas,
Thursday, November 18, 1999, 9:38:24 PM, you wrote:
DH I need a PGP source that's not in the USA, since I'm not there myself
http://www.replay.com
--
Best regards,
Mark
Using The Bat! 1.37 Beta/3
under Windows 98 4 10 Build 1998
--
Thursday, November 18, 1999, 2:08:06 PM, Ali wrote:
No, it is the point. People should learn to use the program, not the
program to babysit the user.
So you consider it babysitting. H. Oh boy. :)
Yes, I do. When something breaks the internal logic of the UI just for
the whims of a
Hello Steve,
Thursday, November 18, 1999, 6:41:24 PM, you wrote:
SL Thursday, November 18, 1999, 2:08:06 PM, Ali wrote:
No, it is the point. People should learn to use the program, not the
program to babysit the user.
So you consider it babysitting. H. Oh boy. :)
SL Yes, I do.
Sunday, November 21, 1999, 3:56:22 PM, Alexander wrote:
Then what makes *you personally* stay on it? The lists like this
are for the people who want to know more about the program
(mostly beginners) and for those who wanna help them. You
don't seem to be either. So what?
Someone needs
Beginners shouldn't really be making suggestions. Furthermore
everyone is a beginner exactly once. I don't like things that are
geared for beginners at the exclusion of those who aren't because of
that.
I was waiting for this. So now you get your way around here only due
to seniority.
Thursday, November 18, 1999, 4:20:25 PM, Kevin wrote:
I was waiting for this. So now you get your way around here only due
to seniority. Cute.
No, experience. There is a difference.
You know, most people get over the "I know more than everybody else"
stage sometime in their teens.
On 21 November 1999 at 21:50, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
AVK Hi there!
Hi Alex - nice to see you back on the list proper! :-)
AVK On 18 Nov 99, at 22:20, Bernhard Kaiser wrote
AVK about "Re[2]: (No Subject)":
People like Steve Lamb make it so hard for beginners to stay in
this
\\\|///
/ ~ _ \
(- O o -)
--oOOo-(_)-oOOo---
Hello Steve,
Time for a Steve Lamb kill filter.
SL Love you too.
I've gotta admit: I just love the sarcasm :-)
--
Der Immer Jodelende
Hi all,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
snip
People like Steve Lamb make it so hard for beginners to stay in
this list.
This is the main point of the objections to the style of Steve Lamb's
postings.
As a matter of fact, although I misunderstood his writing style myself
when he
Hi Steve,
on Friday, November 19, 1999, 12:22:22 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Steve, please don't call peoples suggestions idiotic especially when
it's not necessary.
SL It was. An understanding of basic UI at the level of around an AOL user
SL would be all that is required to deduce
Hi Steve,
on Friday, November 19, 1999, 1:58:33 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Simple : Not everyone has this allegedly logical stepwise approach. I
tend to prefer this stepwise approach and this is why I have no need
for no subject error messages or reminders to enter an address, but
this
Hi Steve,
on Friday, November 19, 1999, 5:58:21 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
People like Steve Lamb make it so hard for beginners to stay in this list.
SL Beginners shouldn't really be making suggestions.
Pu-leaze, Steve. And by the way, with 21 years of computer programming,
I don't
On Thursday, November 18, 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:
No, it isn't an assumption. In creating a message there are several
steps. In every other case the UI places you into the header section
of the creation process before the body of the message with one
exception, replies. Personally, I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, November 18, 1999, 9:50:17 AM, Pasquale wrote:
Hello TBUDL,
Thanks to all, I had the save in separate directory checked ( I
think this was default ), so now I have show in line ticked.
Two other questions, the Attach folder is
Hi all,
Watcher wrote:
Thanks to all, I had the save in separate directory checked ( I
think this was default ), so now I have show in line ticked.
Two other questions, the Attach folder is hidden in The Bat, but
viewable in windows explorer is this by design?, and lastly when
I
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Friday, November 19, 1999, Paula Ford wrote about
(No Subject):
PF You're talking about a case, however, where the user has consciously
PF requested that the cursor be put in a specific position. Why not honor
PF that request?
%cursor macro means that cursor
--
Thought for the day:
The average woman would rather be beautiful than smart because
the average man sees better than he thinks.
---
--
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to
36 matches
Mail list logo
