Hello tracer,
Friday, October 29, 1999, 5:59:36 AM, you wrote:
t Thats why splitting files and sending them as one by one seperate
t parts is better and more polite but really files should be ftp'd.
t Its really not that complicated to run an ftp server on your system so
t that the receiver
Friday, October 29, 1999
Hello Ali,
Friday, Friday, October 29, 1999, you wrote:
Ali Hi all,
Ali On Thursday, October 28, 1999, 1:34:14 PM (-5 GMT), tracer scribbled:
Try dragging the big attachment.. the 22 mb attachment was in progress
of transfer (ie a 30 mb email!!!) but as I guess
Hi tracer,
you wrote on Thursday, October 28, 1999, 20:34:14:
Is anybody able to replicate this? (I already sent a bug report)
Ray Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
Try dragging the big attachment..
Very interesting. It does not crash then. Also, attaching the file went
much
Hi all,
On Friday, October 29, 1999, 2:32:56 AM (-5 GMT), tracer scribbled:
Ali Sending attachments is discouraged on this list. Your message
Ali alone is the equivalent of 10-15 others on average.
Ali The nature of your attachment and the fact that you sent it in the
Ali first place shows
Friday, October 29, 1999, 3:15:03 AM, Lionel wrote:
Except some users can't do it: Forbidden by the agreement between the
ISP and them. It's my case : Cable user in France, forbidden to put up
any sort of a server, FTP, HTTP nor anything other. If I want to put
an FTP server on my cable
Friday, October 29, 1999, 3:15:03 AM, Lionel wrote:
Except some users can't do it: Forbidden by the agreement between the
ISP and them. It's my case : Cable user in France, forbidden to put up
any sort of a server, FTP, HTTP nor anything other. If I want to put
an FTP server on my cable
On 29 October 1999 at 14:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] told the list:
RB apparently the address of this list has changed to
RB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually, it should not have changed and will not be doing so.
Following this weeks configuration disaster, Syafril is in the process
Hello Steve everybody else on this topic,
SL Most ISPs give you server space so you can put files up for others to get
SL in case you need it. They also offer HTTP most of the time which is also a
SL better protocol than SMTP/POP to move mail.
If you're looking for space on the web to
Hi Ralf Buschmann,
On Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 1999 at 21:02:23 you wrote:
RB Hi Oliver,
RB you wrote on Thursday, October 28, 1999, 8:09:29 PM:
That's exactly what I meant in this thread. The algorithm used by The
Bat! at the moment just doesn't look to me like someone could explain
it
Hi Ralf Buschmann,
On Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 1999 at 21:07:26 you wrote:
RB Hi Oliver,
RB you wrote on Thursday, October 28, 1999, 8:20:42 PM:
Is anybody able to replicate this? (I already sent a bug report)
RV Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
Seems to be a problem of
Hi Oliver,
you wrote on Friday, October 29, 1999, 8:37:40 PM:
RV Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
Seems to be a problem of 1.36. I certainly did it before, but now the
error is reproducible with a 20 MB file on a 256 MB PIII. Hm.
RB Oliver, how long does it take on your
Hi Nick,
If I have, under Mail Management, Delete received messages from
server *and* Receive header only if message size greater than X -
both checked, and a "larger than" message comes in does it.
A. Download the header and keep the message on the server
or
B. Download the header
Saturday, October 30, 1999
Hello Lionel,
Friday, Friday, October 29, 1999, you wrote:
I forgot another option one has.
If netbeui is installed, all you have to do is have a partition shared
with a password on it and tell your friend the password and ip and he
can transfer direct in and out
Saturday, October 30, 1999
Hello Ali,
Friday, Friday, October 29, 1999, you wrote:
(snip)
Ali Actually I read the mail, but sometimes I fail to remember names
Ali associated with points made unless I'm well acquainted with the
Ali individual such as Steve or Leif or Mark. My apologies for the
Saturday, October 30, 1999
Hello Ralf,
Saturday, Saturday, October 30, 1999, you wrote:
Ralf Hi Oliver,
Ralf you wrote on Friday, October 29, 1999, 8:37:40 PM:
RV Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
Seems to be a problem of 1.36. I certainly did it before, but now the
error is
Saturday, October 30, 1999
Hello Ralf,
Saturday, Saturday, October 30, 1999, you wrote:
Ralf Hi Oliver,
Ralf you wrote on Friday, October 29, 1999, 8:37:40 PM:
RV Ack here too! PII 64 MB of RAM. 7 MB exe file.
Seems to be a problem of 1.36. I certainly did it before, but now the
error is
Hi Steve,
on Friday, October 29, 1999, 12:04:47 AM GMT+0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Why? Even if this was meant to offend computers (which it wasn't), why
do you take it personally?
SL Because it is an attack on those who don't find computers in that manner.
I don't feel it that way. Hmm.
Hi Paula -
Wednesday, October 27, 1999, 7:46:41 PM, you wrote:
When viewing messages by thread, is it really necessary to have
the subject for every message within a thread displayed?
PF I also find this cluttered and awkward. Either of the alternatives
PF you suggest sounds like an
unsubscribe tbudl
--
Ralph Bednarski http://www.bednarski-beverungen.de
Beverungen/Germany PGP-Key-ID: 0x813E147D
19 matches
Mail list logo
